Sirenews (ISSN 1017-3439) appears twice a year
in April and October and is
edited by Daryl P. Domning,
Department of Anatomy, Howard
University, Washington, D.C. 20059 USA
(fax: 202-265-7055). It is
supported by the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission.
NUMBER 23 APRIL 1995
IN THIS ISSUE: - MANATEE SURVEYS AND
RELEASES IN BRAZIL (p. 4)
-
DUGONG CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
INDONESIA
(p. 5)
-
RADIOTAGGING MANATEES IN MEXICO (p. 6)
EDITORIAL: FLORIDA MANATEE FISHERY
ACHIEVES NEW RECORD TAKE
The annual
harvest of manatees in Florida
last year scored an all-time high
total of animals taken,
according to figures compiled by the state's
Department of Environmental Protection. The
1994 summary of manatee mortality lists a total of 70 deaths
attributable to human-related causes
(watercraft collisions,
floodgates/canal locks, and other),
the largest number since
record-keeping began in 1974. The number of watercraft-related deaths (49) was
the third highest on record (after 53 in 1991 and 50 in 1989), and the
total number of deaths (192) was second only to the maximum of 206 reached in 1990. These
numbers represent an annual
mortality of about
10% of the Florida manatee
population, based on
the current population estimate of around 2,000. (Population models
indicate that, even given a low rate of
mortality, a sirenian population
is capable of increasing at a rate of only
about 5-6% per year.)
After showing
rapid growth in the late 1980's that peaked in 1991, the
harvest went into a
two-year slump that
many have attributed
to poor economic
conditions which
discouraged growth in boating. The 1994 statistics indicate
that recovery from this slump
is now complete, and with human
population growth and boat registrations in Florida surging to new highs, it is safe to anticipate the
most successful manatee harvest ever in '95.
Despite this
continued strong growth in the manatee fishery, however, there is
cause for concern over
its future in
the longer run. This
is because of
its unusual nature
in comparison with other forms of resource use. Typical commercial
harvests of living resources obey the
ecological laws of
predator-prey
relationships, because the
harvesters' direct nutritional
or economic dependence on the harvest creates a negative feedback loop. If the
prey are overexploited, the yield diminishes and eventually forces a
corresponding diminution of the harvesting
effort: the predators
either die, go
out of business, or start
exploiting other resources. This
is also true of purely recreational fisheries, since the fishing effort
is at
least partly a function
of the take. The Florida manatee fishery, in contrast, is exempt
from this kind of
natural regulation, because it constitutes an incidental take that
mostly occurs in the absence of
any intent or
even consciousness on the part
of those causing
the mortality. Moreover, the
carcasses of the
harvested animals are not put
to any commercial or even recreational use whose loss might be felt. Therefore, not even total
extinction of the manatee stock would cause the harvesting
effort (e.g., power boating) to diminish.
This lack of natural regulation, then, predicts
that the manatee harvest will eventually collapse, owing to practical extinction of the manatee
stock. (Indeed, the Potential Biological Removal [PBR] level calculated
for this stock by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is already zero individuals per year.) The
basic problem we must acknowledge is that the manatee-fishing fleet is
already heavily overcapitalized,
with too much investment in
expensive and overly-efficient fishing gear (hulls and high-powered engines). In the absence of
natural feedback to control the accelerating growth of this
already too large and efficient fleet, artificial regulation by government (e.g., limits on boat speeds and numbers
of launching ramps) is an unfortunate
necessity if we are to get the manatee PBR level back up where it belongs and
enjoy a healthy harvest of manatees
into the next century.
An ominous
aspect of this situation, however, is the fact that excess
fishing capacity inevitably generates
political pressures to increase fishery quotas - in this case, upward
from the present PBR of zero.
Therefore, without reduction in the human population whose growth is
ultimately driving the expansion of this and every other fishing fleet,
there is little hope of rebuilding the manatee stock to a safely
exploitable level.
One cause
for optimism, on the other hand, is the heavy involvement of
the Florida state government
in manatee conservation. This contrasts with the situation in (for
example) Hawaii, where the Hawaiian monk seal recovery effort has been
almost entirely the work of federal
agencies. When the
federal budget is tight, as it has been
for years, there
is no effective state program with an independent mandate
and funding source to take up the
slack. The result of this essentially single-source funding base is that
the monk seal program has been chronically
underfunded and essential recovery tasks have been left undone, to the
extent that the Hawaiian monk seal is now seriously in
danger of being the world's first managed species of marine mammal
to face biological extinction. Florida, in contrast, was willing and able
to shoulder an increasing share of the manatee program as
the federal involvement diminished
over the past decade. As a result, the manatee's status (despite continuing
cause for concern) is much less precarious than the monk seal's.
It is, in principle, a
healthier and more stable situation when the people of a state claim
ownership of, and accept the responsibility for, a local conservation program, rather than leaving Washington (read: the taxpayers
of all the other states) to carry the entire burden. It is to
be hoped that
the Florida state
government will continue
to recognize the
historic importance of its role
and responsibility for protecting the manatee in U.S. waters. Much has already
been done to fulfill this responsibility, but the greatest and most
urgent challenge still lies ahead: to
rein in the reckless growth and activity of our own species. - DPD
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR MANATEE
RESEARCH
Save the Manatee Club (SMC) is interested in
research projects involving the West
Indian manatee in the
wild. SMC is specifically interested in projects that
are prioritized in
the Florida Manatee Recovery Plan and are therefore considered important
for the recovery of the Florida manatee.
The deadline for receipt of proposals for funding in 1996 is
15 September 1995. Interested
individuals should submit a letter of inquiry (no more than two pages) stating explicitly how the proposed
research project relates to the
goals of the
Florida Manatee Recovery Plan
and an estimate of cost. (Note: SMC does not pay overhead or similar charges.)
The average cost of research projects
funded in recent years is approximately
$6000 in the U.S. and about $1550 out of country.
Research proposals involving unforeseen, critical events may be submitted any time. Investigators should
determine whether an Endangered
Species Permit is required for the proposed work. Contact
Patti Thompson, Save the Manatee Club, 500 N. Maitland Ave., Suite 210,
Maitland, FL 32751 for further information and instructions for submitting full
proposals. Phone 1-800-432-5646.
SUMMER SCHOOL ON ZOO ANIMAL
BEHAVIOR AND WELFARE
Edinburgh Zoo,
in conjunction with the University of Edinburgh, is offering
a two-week summer
school from 17 to 28 July 1995 on Zoo Animal Behaviour and Welfare.
It is designed for
all those involved in management and husbandry of captive animal
populations (zoos, safari parks,
rear-and-release schemes, etc.), and will update participants on the
latest scientific theory and its practical implementation. Edinburgh
Zoo's research has resulted
in changes in enclosure
design and marked
reduction in stereotyped
behavior and general boredom. The tuition cost
is Ł750 (add-on
accommodation package, Ł140);
registration deadline is 31 May 1995. For information, contact Hamish
Macandrew, UnivEd Technologies
Ltd., Abden House, 1 Marchhall
Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 5HP, UK; tel.:
0131-650-3475; fax: 0131-650-3474.
SIRENEWS AND
OTHER MANATEE INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET
The Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP) now makes several sources of manatee-related information available on
the Internet. This
includes the contents
of brochures on basic
manatee biology, protective
measures, and safe
boating practices in manatee areas. Manatee mortality
statistics will also be posted in the future. You can reach this service at the following address:
www.dep.state.fl.us (this provides access to
DEP's Internet node; the manatee
information can then be obtained by choosing the option "Protected Species Management").
Beginning with
this issue, Sirenews will also
be accessible via this service.
This may not have happened by
the time you receive this issue, but it is in the works for the near future.
READERS PLEASE
NOTE: In the event that you find this new
way of receiving Sirenews sufficient
for your needs and you no longer wish to receive the hard-copy
version, please notify me
of this by fax or regular mail
(NOT via e-mail) so that
our printing and mailing costs can be kept down.
Thanks! - DPD
ABSTRACTS OF PUBLISHED PAPERS
IN SIRENEWS?
A reader has inquired
whether it would be possible for Sirenews
to print abstracts from published
papers in addition to those from unpublished presentations and theses. I do
not have the time to do the necessary
typing, which would be extremely burdensome (and take up an inordinate amount of space) if I
attempted to include all the new papers cited
in each issue. However, if authors submit abstracts of their new papers on diskette, I am
willing to include them on a space-available basis. Indeed, I would
appreciate it if all submissions were made on diskette,
preferably in WordStar
or ASCII IBM-compatible
format. I'll even
return your diskettes! - DPD
LOCAL NEWS
BRAZIL
Preliminary Studies of Manatee (Trichechus manatus) Distribution and Status and Conservation Efforts on the Northern Coast of Brazil. -
Continuing the work of
the "Igarakuę" mobile
unit of IBAMA's National Center for Conservation and Management of Sirenians
(Centro Peixe-Boi), preliminary studies have been
carried out on manatee distribution and status on the northern coast of Brazil.
The study area was approximately 2600 km of coastline,
comprising the states
of Maranhao, Pará, and Amapá,
including also Marajó Island and the
mouths of the Amazon River. Between 20
March and 11 September 1992, researchers conducted 136
interviews at 74 localities
along the coast of Maranhao, which was divided into five regions: (I)
the mouth of the Paraiba
River; (II) "Lençóis Maranhenses"; (III)
Tubarao Bay; (IV) "Golfao Maranhense"; and
(V) "Reentrâncias Maranhenses".
Manatees were found to occur in regions III, IV, and V,
with region III
the most important. They are
absent from large areas. The total population of the Maranhao
coast appears to be little more than 100
animals, occupying areas of
mangroves and "paturá" (Spartina
sp.). Harpoon hunting occurs
rarely; fishing nets seem to be
the main way of capturing manatees in the region.
Between June and August 1993, the Pará coast,
Marajó Island, the
Amazon mouths and the Amapá
coast were surveyed. In Pará, 85
interviews were done
and 55 localities visited;
in Amapá, 44
interviews and 29 localities. The presence of
manatees was recorded in
the Gurupi River
estuary (the boundary between
Pará and Maranhao). They have disappeared from almost the entire Pará coast,
but manatees of unknown
species (T.
manatus or T. inunguis) are present near
the mouth of Marajó Bay. In the inner portion of the bay, on the
mainland as far as Belém, we found evidence
only of T. inunguis, but
in the part close to Marajó Island (Soure, Pesqueiro) we found indications of the occurrence
of both species. In the entire
area of the Pará River surrounding the island as
far as Macapá, as well as on the coasts of the island
and the adjacent archipelago, in the Amazon mouths,
and in the area
of Lake Piratuba (Amapá), we found evidence of the continuous occurrence of T. inunguis. Along the Amapá coast from Marajó Island to
the Oiapoque River (the boundary between Brazil and French Guiana), the
species present is T. manatus.
Many harpoon hunters are
still actively killing both
species. In Amapá they use an interesting method employing a
"mutá", a
platform on which the hunter waits with his harpoon when the tide rises and the manatees come to feed on
the surrounding submerged vegetation.
Through this work the
Centro Peixe-Boi has surveyed the range of T. manatus along the
entire coast of Brazil - a four-year
study in ten states, involving 862 interviews
and visits to 357 localities. In
each locality conservation efforts
were developed with
the community, through dissemination of
information and ongoing
participation of the population. - Régis Pinto de Lima (Centro Peixe-Boi, IBAMA, Paripueira, Alagoas)
First Reintroduction of Manatees into the
Wild in Northeastern Brazil. -
On 10 October 1994,
two 3-year-old manatees (Trichechus m.
manatus), rescued
as orphaned calves in 1991 and kept in
captivity since then, were
transported from the facilities of
IBAMA's National Center for Conservation and Management of Sirenians
(Itamaraca Island) to Paripueira Beach in
Alagoas State, where a circular
wooden pen 15 m in diameter was constructed to
enclose the animals, providing for gradual readaptation
to the natural environment and also for
behavioral studies.
The
animals, Astro (male)
and Lua (female), traveled
to Paripueira aboard
a truck in a
fiberglass tank half filled
with water and with
its bottom covered
with polyurethane-sponge cushioning. After a 210-mile trip
lasting more than 10 hours,
they were placed, one at a time,
in a stretcher to be moved to an inflatable boat that took
them to the pen, approximately 800
m from the beach.
Immediately after the transport, Astro
and Lua showed the same pattern of behavior that they used to have in captivity,
eating, playing, and resting. During the very first hours they
were observed eating algae (Ulva sp.) and seagrass (Halodule sp.) that grew inside the pen.
Their
diet gradually came to
include a higher percentage
of seagrass and
algae collected in the
vicinity of the
pen. They always welcomed the seagrass (having
been fed Halodule in captivity), but accepted only a
few species of
algae. Their feces
were collected for future analysis.
Astro and Lua
showed very dependent behavior and extensive interactions, even nursing on each other frequently. A bioacoustic study was
done to correlate their behavior and
vocalizations.
During their first week in the pen, they received a
visit from a group of three wild manatees, one adult, one
young, and one calf, which remained around the pen for
over two hours and
then left. No
other wild manatees were
reported close to the pen.
After 70 days, both animals
were judged ready for release.
In December they were marked with
PTT/VHF transmitters in
a cooperative effort between the technicians of the Centro Peixe-Boi
and James Reid of the U.S.
National Biological Service's
Sirenia Project. The animals were then measured, in order
to verify any loss of weight
after release.
On 15 December, after a short
period of training, both animals were accompanied by a
diver to the
area outside the
pen. This procedure was continued for five days, each time going further away but always
returning to the pen, until the release day,
when the gate was opened and the
animals went out by themselves.
Prior
to the release, efforts were made to
inform all coastal communities of the important role they would play in
the release, reporting any sightings of
the marked animals or the
transmitters. This was done through informal conversations,
distribution of posters, TV,
and radio, and as a result many
calls were received from all along the
coast reporting sightings of
Astro, Lua, and wild manatees.
Astro and Lua have
been radio-tracked since their
release with approximately 10 hours of observation every day. In the
first weeks they gradually expanded their range north and
south, always using the pen
as a reference point. Both animals have lost their transmitters at least twice, but were always retagged. They have now been observed
in areas used by wild manatees.
They have not lost any considerable amount of weight, and are always observed in shallow
waters, feeding, playing, traveling,
and resting.
Also worth
noting is another first: the
creation of the Paripueira
Municipal Marine Park, the
first marine park of
its kind in Latin
America, which hopefully
will help raise the
environmental
consciousness of local communities
as well as provide additional
protection to the manatees'
habitat in Alagoas. - Régis Pinto de Lima (Centro Peixe-Boi, IBAMA, Paripueira, Alagoas) (Mario Antonio de Mello, Municipal Secretary for
the Environment, Paripueira,
also contributed to this report.)
INDONESIA
Indonesia-Netherlands Dugong Research Project
Makes Conservation
Recommendations. - The
joint research project being carried out by Pattimura
University (Indonesia) and
Leiden University (The Netherlands) considers the dugong
a flagship species for coastal
conservation in Indonesia. There
and throughout coastal Asia, habitats are threatened by
unsustainable fishing (e.g., with dynamite
or cyanide) and land-based activities
causing erosion and sedimentation in seagrass beds.
Our observations are
based on a
small area and
thus should be interpreted with care, but since the situation in the Lease islands is representative
of many tropical
small-island ecosystems
outside Australia, our results
should be of interest
to those working in similar
ecosystems.
Since 1990 we have studied seagrass dynamics, the impact of dugong
feeding, and dugong movements and
behavior in Haruku Strait, between
Ambon and Haruku. Aerial surveys (1990-91)
indicated a minimum population of
22-37 dugongs. Satellite-tracking of a subadult male
showed that these animals
interact with a
larger population around Ceram
Island to the north.
The available seagrass meadows are confined to a coastal shelf no more than 500 m
wide, and all
are situated in
front of coastal villages. Most
of the dugongs consistently foraged on only 2-3 "core areas";
cultivation grazing was
common and small (presumably family) groups of
dugongs returned regularly to
the same feeding plots. Dugongs adapted
their feeding strategy to the characteristics
of individual meadows.
An intertidal meadow showed feeding peaks only during August-October (at the end
of the rainy season), when total organic carbon
in the below-ground biomass
is maximal in these
Halodule-dominated meadows.
In a single subtidal meadow, on the other hand, peak feeding occurred in October-November, when standing
crop was maximal. Grazing on the whole was infrequent or absent
from January to May, when rhizome/root
biomass is low, and frequent from June to December, during and after the onset of the wet
monsoon, when rhizome/root biomass is high. There
are strong indications that (as in
Australia) calving takes place
mainly when high rhizome/root biomass
is available.
We have concluded that the
existing marine reserve in Pulau
Pombo is insignificant for dugong conservation because of
its relatively sparse seagrass
beds, and have recommended to the local
government the establishment of
dugong sanctuaries in Haruku Strait, Saparua Bay,
and Piru. Dugong conservation
and management in the Moluccas will in
general require enforcement of
existing international and
national laws respecting dugong
catches and trade
in dugong products; continued
research on dugong migration,
distribution, and reproduction; promotion of community-based conservation; and implementation of a coastal-zone management plan that includes dugong protection. Our
specific recommendations are as
follows:
a. Enforcement
of existing regulations protecting dugongs in East
Ambon.
b. Creation
of the dugong sanctuaries
mentioned above. Declaration of these sanctuaries should coincide with enforcement and enhancement of traditional conservation systems,
like the local "sasi laut".
c. Restriction
of gillnet fishing
during periods of high rhizome-root
biomass of Halodule in sanctuary
areas, to prevent incidental
catch of neonates.
d. Training
of Pattimura University students in
dugong and seagrass research methods, so that they can take over this research in the future.
e. Production and distribution of dugong
posters, leaflets, and T-shirts among government offices, village leaders, schoolteachers, pupils,
and households in the project
area. This should be done in close
cooperation with the Asian Wetland
Bureau, PHPS, WWF Jakarta, Oceanarium
Ancol in Jakarta, and the Yayasan Hualopy
in Ambon. - Hans de Iongh
MEXICO
Manatee
Research in Mexico. -
Belize and the Mexican state of Quintana Roo share one of the larger
populations of West Indian manatees
outside Florida. Resource managers from
both countries are
concerned that the current and future development plans for the region may endanger the manatees,
but more information on their habitat
needs is required to develop protection plans. Biologists from Quintana Roo and Belize initiated a study
of the manatees in
the region, including
a population assessment using aerial surveys. A radio-tracking study has also been started to determine movement patterns and
habitat use of the manatees in Chetumal
Bay.
The radio-tracking project
is led by Benjamin Morales Vela, a marine
mammalogist with the Centro
de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo (CIQRO) in the city of
Chetumal. Because this is one of the first radio-tracking studies of West
Indian manatees outside Florida,
CIQRO biologists David Olivera Gomez and Gerardo Rivas
Hernandez spent a week in Florida
during late October 1994 learning how to construct the specialized radio-tags.
In addition, two biologists from the United States National
Biological Service, Bob Bonde from the Sirenia Project in Gainesville,
Florida, and Galen Rathbun from the Piedras Blancas Research
Station in San Simeon, California,
traveled to Chetumal to give advice and
assistance with the initial phase of
the project. The objectives
of this initial phase were to
develop capture methods for manatees in
the Chetumal Bay area, and train Mexican and Belizian biologists in
the techniques of radio-tagging and tracking manatees.
Between 8 and
18 November 1994, Mexican, American, and Belizian
biologists worked at capturing and radio-tagging two
manatees, under a permit issued
by the Mexican government to
CIQRO. Bob Bonde brought capture nets from Florida, with
the hope of finding some animals in a
suitable canal or lagoon
where the nets
would be effective. Galen Rathbun brought equipment to try and capture
manatees in open water with hand-held
hoop-nets, a technique that he helped develop for dugongs in Australia.
Both techniques, however,
failed. Manatees were not found in any
narrow canals or channels in
November, and thus the nets were of
little use. The
capture team also failed to hoop-net any
manatees in open water, although some were
"almost" captured. The
escape behavior of manatees
is very different from that
of dugongs. Even when
fleeing at nearly full-speed, as soon
as the manatees sensed a net or noose near their head they tucked and rolled out of
the net with incredible speed
and agility.
In the end,
a chase-and-tire capture method that Mexican fishermen
traditionally used in the region was used. In contrast
to the fishermen's method, however, an airplane was used
to find manatees in good capture locations. At the end of an aerial search,
the pilot would drop a map in a
plastic bottle to the waiting
capture boats, and
with this information the
capture team efficiently located manatees in clear,
shallow water. The boats were used to continually, but
gently, chase and herd the same manatee until it tired after 1-2
hours. At this
point swimmers entered the
water and slipped a rope noose over
the head and onto
the peduncle. The first
manatee captured, named Carmen,
was easily brought alongside the
boats, where it was sexed, measured, and radio-tagged while surrounded by swimmers standing in
chest-deep water. The
second manatee, named Gabriela, was captured in
deeper water, which gave the
opportunity to test a modified inflatable
boat to cradle her while
she was moved to water where
swimmers could stand; it all worked perfectly.
The
chase-and-tire technique worked very well
in Chetumal Bay,
but probably has limited use in other areas where the water is deeper and more turbid. Unless an individual manatee
can be followed for one
or two hours until
it tires, there is little chance
of approaching it with nets or nooses.
The two female
manatees have been radio-located one or more times a week
since they were tagged.
During December and January neither moved more than about 9
km from their capture locations. With the experience and success gained from capturing and radio-tagging these
two manatees, plans are being
developed to tag up to 10 more individuals
in the next two years. However,
this plan must now be reassessed
in terms of the dynamics of the Mexican
peso. - Benjamin Morales Vela,
Galen B. Rathbun, and David Olivera Gomez
PALAU
Palauan Dugongs Once More "Officially" Endangered. -
What one bureaucratic oversight
does, another can sometimes undo. Thus it came
to pass that way back in 1970,
when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the dugong
as endangered under the Endangered
Species Conservation Act of 1969,
separate lists of foreign and
domestic protected species were
being maintained, and the dugong
was placed only on the
foreign list - although
the Palauan population was then
under U.S. jurisdiction.
This slip-up was
seemingly rectified when the
1969 act was superseded
by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 and the
separate lists were merged
into a
single one. The dugong was included on this list as endangered throughout its range -
including, implicitly and for the first time under U.S. law,
Palau.
In 1988, however, the Service belatedly
discovered that this
inclusion of the Palauan dugong population
had been made without the required
public notice. Contrary to the ESA's provisions, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands had not
been notified of the proposed change in
listing and invited to comment on it.
Upon discovering this second procedural oversight, the Service then deleted
the Palauan dugongs from the list. This
left them outside the protection
of both the ESA and the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (which never applied to the Trust Territory), and
thus protected only
by inadequately-enforced
Palauan law.
Not until
August 1993 did the Service finally
publish a proposed rule to
re-list the Palauan population
as endangered. Also in that
year, at the
instigation of the
U.S. Marine Mammal Commission, the drafting of a recovery
plan for the
population was begun. Both
efforts were still underway on 1
October 1994, when
Palau became fully independent and the Service's
management authority over Palauan dugongs ended.
So where
does that leave the dugongs, rule-wise? In the view of sources in the U.S. government, Palauan independence has
now rendered the issue moot, because the
1988 listing applied to the dugong's entire range
"except USA." Now that
dugongs no longer exist in the USA, the Palauan population is, by
default, once again
considered endangered, with no
further legal action required.
Meanwhile, the
Palauan population
continues its decline, and the recovery
plan (which will be
turned over to the
Palauan Government when completed)
cannot be implemented too soon.
- (based in part
on the Marine Mammal Commission Annual Reports to Congress, 1993 and 1994)
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Dugong
Surveys Planned in
the Arabian Gulf. -
Recent wildlife surveys in UAE waters of the southern Arabian
Gulf by the Abu Dhabi-based National
Avian Research Center have pinpointed specific areas apparently used regularly by herds
of dugongs. Although precise
population estimates are still lacking,
anecdotal evidence gleaned from local
fishermen suggests that significant numbers remain.
The rather piecemeal observations achieved to date are hopefully to be replaced by systematic aerial surveys and quarterly monitoring flights (during which turtles will also be censused) from late 1995 onward. A proposal to satellite-tag one or more animals is a possibility, with research on the distribution and productivity of seagrass beds also likely. Such