Sirenews (ISSN 1017-3439) appears twice a year

in April and October and is edited by Daryl P. Domning,

Department of Anatomy, Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059  USA

(fax: 1-202-265-7055). It is supported by the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission

and Sea World, Inc.

 

 

 

NUMBER 24                                                                                                     OCTOBER 1995

 

 

IN THIS ISSUE:      -  U.S.  SIRENIA  PROJECT  THREATENED  WITH  EXTINCTION 

                                                              (p. 11)

 

                                                          -  DUGONGS DECLINING IN QUEENSLAND  (p. 5)

 

                                                          -  LARGE-SCALE  POACHING  IN  BELIZE  AND  UNITED  ARAB

                                                              EMIRATES  (pp. 7, 11)

 

                                                          -  ADVENTUROUS   FLORIDA  MANATEE   EXTENDS   SPECIES'

                                                              RANGE TO NEW ENGLAND  (p. 9)

 

 

 

DEATHS  REPORTED

 

Tammy Dominguez and Amaury Villalba

 

 

          Last  January,  Tammy  Dominguez, her colleague, Amaury  Villalba,  and  their  pilot were killed when their plane went down during a manatee survey off Barahona on the southern coast  of the Dominican Republic.  A third colleague, José Ottenwalder, was injured but  made a  miraculous  escape, and is doing fine.  We first started to correspond  with  Tammy  shortly before  the  1994  First International Manatee and Dugong  Research  Conference,  which  she attended.   She was also an active participant in the Manatee and Dugong Research  Workshop which  followed the conference. Tammy was very dedicated to the conservation of  sea  turtles and  marine mammals, especially manatees.  She is greatly missed by all of her  colleagues.  

                                                                                              -  Lynn Lefebvre (Sirenia Project)


MANATEE AERIAL SURVEY SAFETY RULES

 

          Manatee aerial surveys present special hazards to survey biologists because of the small planes  that  are typically used (they can easily be overloaded), the relatively  low  flight  level (generally  500 feet), the tight turns that are frequently made to count manatees (possibility  of stalling), and flight paths over water.  At times, the dedication of the surveyors may become  a hazard,  if their determination to complete a mission interferes with their judgment  concerning weather conditions, the qualifications of their pilot, and the condition of the aircraft.

Listed  below are some "common sense" rules for manatee aerial survey personnel.   They  are not  intended  to  be all-inclusive, but represent the highlights of regulations  provided  by  the Office  of  Aircraft Services (OAS), which all Department of Interior (DOI) employees  in  the U.S. must follow when participating in work-related aviation.

          Ms.  Burma Campbell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is gratefully acknowledged  for providing  information used to develop these rules, for reviewing them, and for her  continued interest and encouragement.

 

 _    The Cessna 172 aircraft is underpowered for low-level flying (less than 500 feet).   During low-level  missions, aircraft cannot operate lawfully at a higher certified load  (aircraft, passengers, fuel, cargo) than that recommended by the manufacturer.  If more than two observers are planned, then a Cessna 182, 185, or 206 is recommended.

 

 _    Surveys  should never be flown at an altitude lower than 500 feet.  Many survey  biologists prefer  an  altitude of about 750 feet for circling and counting of  manatees  in  groups.  Under  DOI  Aviation  Policy, aircrew members may not fly  below  500  feet  without special training and personal protective equipment.

 

 _     Know  your  pilot's qualifications.  How many hours of flight experience does  he  or  she have  in  the aircraft in which you will be a passenger?  OAS regulations  require  1000 hours of flying time in order to certify a pilot.

 

 _    Know  your plane's service record.  DOI Aviation Policy requires servicing and  inspection of a plane after every 100 hours of flying time.

 

 _    Prepare  a  GO/NO GO checklist that you go through before every flight.  While  the  pilot has the final say in the decision to GO, remember YOU always have the final say in the decision  to cancel a flight.  If you have any doubts about the weather, the pilot, or  the plane, cancel the flight.  You are much more important than a missed survey! Also,  all surveys  should be conducted under optimal weather conditions to ensure some  comparability across survey dates; questionable weather means questionable survey results.  If changes  occur  in  the weather or pilot or observer mental  or  physical  condition,  the observer  should call off the mission and request the pilot to return to home base, or  to land at the nearest suitable location, depending upon the severity of the change in flight conditions.

 

 _     Prepare  a  flight plan and give it to ground personnel at the airfield(s)  where  your  flight originates  and ends.  The person(s) to whom you give it will be responsible  for  flight following and will institute search and rescue procedures if your aircraft does not  reach its destination within  one hour of its estimated time of arrival.

 

 _     Only cargo and passengers which are essential to a mission should be on the aircraft.   Not only  does  this eliminate the possibility of an accident from something that  should  not have been onboard, but it keeps the weight of the aircraft at a minimum, thereby  using less  fuel  and  minimizing  costs. Survey biologists should  be  careful  to  secure  such routinely  used objects as: pencils and pens; camera lenses, lens covers, film  canisters, small tape recorders, palm counters, etc.

 

 _     DOI Policy requires the pilot be present to supervise the type, quantity and quality of  fuel used in the aircraft when refueling. There have been misfueling mishaps in the U.S., in which jet fuel has accidentally been put into reciprocating-engined aircraft.

 

 _     If  a  single-engine  aircraft is to be used beyond power-off gliding distance to  shore,  the aircraft should be float-equipped and all persons onboard should have personal flotation devices.

 

 _    Biologists who fly regular missions can benefit from a flight familiarization course  consisting  of  4 hours of ground school and 4 hours of flight training  (cost  is  approximately $500).   It is intended to give passengers limited knowledge of how to  operate  aircraft controls, radios, etc., and land the plane in the event of a pilot-incapacitated  emergency.

 

          Your  comments  on these rules are welcome.  If you would like to help  by  translating them  into  Spanish  or other languages, please contact me.  If you would  like  examples  of  a GO/NO  GO  checklist  or  a flight plan, or information on  the  flight  familiarization  course, please contact: Dr. Lynn Lefebvre, Sirenia Project, National Biological Service, 412 NE  16th Ave., Rm 250, Gainesville, FL 32601 USA; phone: 904-372-2572; Fax: 904-374-8080; Internet: sirenia@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu.  -  Lynn Lefebvre

 

 

 

DEATH  REPORTED

 

Mauricio Prieto

 

 

          A  pioneer  in  field  research  and  conservation  of  aquatic  mammals  in   Colombia, Mauricio  Prieto  died  from  cancer  in  Bogotá  on  1  April  1995,  at  age  39.  He   worked extensively  with cetaceans, and in 1987 he launched a study of the ecology of the  manatee  in the Río San Jorge area, where he perfected his singular competence in environmental education at  the community level. He later turned his attention to marine  mammal-fisheries  interactions on the Pacific coast. With his death, the South American aquatic mammal community has  lost a  spiritual  leader and a genuine conservationist.  (Excerpted from an obituary by  Koen  Van Waerebeek  and  Daniel  Palacios in the Marine Mammal Society Newsletter  3(3):  3,  Sept. 1995.)

 

 

 

INTERNATIONAL DUGONG SYMPOSIUM

 

          An International Symposium on the Dugong will be held at the Toba Aquarium,  Toba, Japan, 15-17 November 1995. Oral presentations (both submitted and invited) will be given on dugong  biology,  paleontology, conservation, rescue, and husbandry.  Investigators,  students, and other interested people are encouraged to attend. A proceedings volume will be distributed at  the  meeting.  For  further  details,  contact  Mr.  Hiroshi  Maeda,  Planning  Office,  Toba Aquarium,  Toba 3-3-6, Mie Prefecture, 517 Japan; phone: 81-599-25-2801;  fax:  81-599-26-3608; E-mail: LDN03052@niftyserve.or.jp; Compuserve: 100463,3176

 


SIRENIA SPECIALIST GROUP MEMBERSHIP

 

          The  following people have agreed to serve as members of the IUCN Sirenia  Specialist Group for the 1994-1996 Triennium:

 

Prof. Helene  MARSH  (Co-Chair), Dept. of Tropical Environment  Studies  &  Geography, James  Cook  Univ., Townsville, Qld. 4811, AUSTRALIA (ph.  +61-77-814325,  fax +61-77-815581, e-mail HELENE@CATHAR.JCU.EDU.AU)

 

Dr. Miriam  MARMONTEL (Co-Chair), Wildlife Biologist, Sociedade Civil Mamirauá,  C.P. 0001,   69470-000   Tefé   AM,   BRAZIL   (ph.   &   fax   +55-92-7432736,    e-mail MANATI@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU)

 

Dr. Vic COCKCROFT,  Curator  of  Marine Mammals, Port  Elizabeth  Museum,  P.O.  Box 13147,   Humewood  6013,  SOUTH  AFRICA  (ph.  +27-41-561051,  fax   +27-41-562175, e-mail PEMVGC@ZOO.UPE.AC.ZA)

 

Mr. Hans    DE    IONGH,   Ecologist/Director,   International   Cooperation,    Centre    for Environmental  Science, P.O. Box 603, 6700 AP Wageningen, THE  NETHERLANDS (ph. +31-71-275642, fax +31-71-277496)

 

Prof. Daryl    DOMNING   (Newsletter   Editor),   Dept.   of   Anatomy,   Howard    Univ., Washington, DC 20059, USA (ph. +1-202-806-6026, fax +1-202-265-7055)

 

Dr. William    FREELAND,   Principal   Wildlife   Research   Officer,    Wildlife    Division, Conservation  Commission of the Northern Territory, P.O. Box 496,  Palmerston,  NT 0831, AUSTRALIA (ph. +61-089-894400, fax +61-089-894524)

 

Dr. Toshio  KASUYA,  Director, Offshore Marine Resources, National Institute  of  Research on  Far  Seas Fisheries, 5-7-1 Orido, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424  JAPAN  (ph.  +81-543-340715, fax +81-543-359642)

 

Dr. Janet   LANYON,  Dept.  of  Zoology,  Univ.  of  Queensland,  Brisbane,  Qld.   4072, AUSTRALIA (ph. +61-7-3654416, fax +61-7-3651655)

 

Dr. Lynn  LEFEBVRE,  Sirenia  Project Leader, National Biological  Service,  412  NE  16th Ave.,  Room 250, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA (ph. +1-904-372-2571,  fax  +1-904-374-8080, e-mail SIRENIA@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU)

 

Ms. Nicole LEOTAUD, Biologist, WIldlife Section, Forestry Division, 15 Monteverde  Th., Morne Coco Road, Petit Valley, Trinidad, TRINIDAD & TOBAGO (ph. +1-809-662-5114, fax +1-809-645-4288)

 

Dr. Antonio MIGNUCCI-GIANNONI, Scientific Coordinator, Red Caribeña de Varamientos, P.O.  Box 38030, San Juan, PUERTO RICO 00937-1030 (ph. +1-809-899-2048,  fax +1-809-899-5500)

 

Dr. Thomas  O'SHEA, Assistant Director, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center,  National Biological  Service,  4512  McMurry Ave., Fort Collins, CO  80525-3400,  USA  (ph. +1-303-226-9397, fax +1-303-226-9230)

 

Dr. James  POWELL, c/o Dr. David Vousden, UNDP/GEF Coastal Zone Management  Unit, Fisheries  Dept.,  P.O. Box 148, Belize City, BELIZE (ph.  501-2-30719,  fax  501-2-35738, e-mail DAVID.VOUSDEN@UNDP-ORG)

 

Dr. Anthony PREEN, Research Fellow, Dept. of Tropical Environment Studies & Geography, James  Cook  Univ., Townsville, Qld. 4811, AUSTRALIA (ph.  +61-77-815575,  fax +61-77-814020, e-mail ANTHONY.PREEN@JCU.EDU.AU)

 

Dr. Galen  RATHBUN,  Research Biologist, National Biological Service, P.O. Box  70,  San Simeon, CA 93452-0070, USA (ph. +1-805-927-3893, fax +1-805-927-3308)

 

Mr. Ismu   Sutanto  SUWELO,  Senior  Instructor,  Centre  for  Education  and  Training   of Forestry  Personnel,  Jalan Gunung Batu, P.O. Box 141, Bogor  16001,  INDONESIA (ph. 0251-312841/0251-323565, fax 0251-240566)

 

 

MANATEE RESEARCH OPPORTUNITY

 

          The  Save the Manatee Club (SMC) is issuing a request for proposals from  researchers interested  in  conducting  aerial surveys to determine manatee abundance  and  distribution  in west Volusia and Brevard counties, Florida, over the next two years. Interested parties  should call  or  e-mail  Patti Thompson at SMC for further information.  Phone:  1-800-432-5646;  e-mail: manatee@america.com

 

 

THANKS,  SEA WORLD!

 

          Sirenews  is pleased to acknowledge an unrestricted donation of $500 from Sea  World, Inc. to help defray printing and mailing expenses. We thank Sea World and Dan Odell for  this generous gesture of support.

 

 

 

LOCAL NEWS

 

AUSTRALIA

 

          Hardening  Evidence  for   Dugong Decline    Along   the   More    Developed Regions   of  the  Coast   of   Queensland, Australia. - The Great Barrier Reef stretches for  some 2000 km along the eastern coast  of Queensland.  The  northern region  along  the coast  of  Cape  York Peninsula  is  a  remote area with a very low human population density  and little development. In contrast,  much of  the area south of Cape York  Peninsula  is undergoing  very rapid coastal  development. This   southern   region   was   surveyed   for dugongs  from the air in 1987 and 1992.  The estimated  number of dugongs present  in  the region  in 1992 was 1857 ± s.e.  292,  much less  than  the 1987 estimate of 3479  ±  s.e. 459  dugongs.  When  differences  in  survey conditions   are  taken  into  account   in   the analyses,  the difference  approaches  significance   (a=0.06),  suggesting   that   dugong numbers have declined in this region.

 

          The  aerial  survey  was  repeated   in November  1994  with the aim  of  evaluating whether  this  observed  decline  was  a   real trend  or  an artifact  of  sighting  conditions, which  were  slightly worse in  1992  than  in 1987.

          The   population   estimate    resulting from   the  1994  survey  was  1750  ±   257 dugongs, supporting the findings of the  1992 survey. Parallel declines were not recorded in the  estimates  of turtles  or  cetaceans  which were recorded in the same surveys.

          The reasons for this decline in dugong numbers   are  probably  complex   and   may include  habitat loss, traditional hunting,  and incidental  drowning of dugongs in  commercial  gillnets. Parallel declines have not  been recorded  in  repeat surveys of  more  remote regions  in  the dugong's  range  in  Australia where   traditional   hunting   and   incidental drowning in gillnets are the major  anthropogenic impacts.  -  Helene Marsh

 

          Dugong Adopts Offshore Oil  Platform as Focal Point for Activity. -  During March-April  1995,  workers on  the  production  platform Vicksburg (21°07' S,  115°06' E)  on the South Pepper oilfield (North  West Shelf   of  Western  Australia),   noticed   the presence of a dugong which appeared to have adopted the platform as its home base.

          Unfortunately,  nobody  recorded  the exact  date  when this dugong  arrived  at  the platform, but its continued presence warranted  entry of a report in the operations  log  of the  Vicksburg on 14 April 1995.  No  further log  entries  were  made  over  the  next  four weeks,  until platform worker  Martin  Rawlings  was  prompted to  report  the  dugong's apparent extended stay to the Western Australian   Museum.  Dr.  Ric  How  referred   the report to R. I. T. Prince.

          Daily  log reports of further  sightings of this dugong were entered from 12  through 26 May 1995. Photographic recording of  the dugong was requested on 25 May, as none of the  platform personnel were known  to  have previously  attempted this. The prints  subsequently  obtained  included  portions  of   the platform   supports,  and  numbers  of   large long-toms (needlefish, Family Belonidae),  as well as the resident dugong.

          The  dugong  apparently  deserted  the rig  between  26 and 27 May. The  last  three relevant log entries, for 27 and 28 May and 1 June,  record the absence of further  sightings of the animal.

          One dugong only was seen around  the Vicksburg  at all times from arrival until  just before  desertion. The observers believe  that they  saw the same animal each time.  Noting the  uncertain  time  of  arrival,  this  dugong centered  its  activities around  the  Vicksburg structure  for a minimum of 8-10 weeks,  and possibly more than 12 weeks.

          Circumstances  of arrival and  fixation of   this  dugong  on  the  platform   are   not known,   but   several   probably   significant events  preceded its  disappearance.  Another two  or  three dugongs  appeared  around  the Vicksburg  about  this  time,  and  a  drop  in ambient  water  temperature of ca.  2-3°C  is also  reported  to have occurred  between  26 and  27 May. It is possible that an  associated change  in water circulation over the  Barrow Islands  Shoals to the north of  the  Vicksburg mobilized  other  dugongs in  that  area,  and that the former platform resident  subsequently  followed its new-found associates as  they moved on.

          The   photographs  of  the   Vicksburg dugong  suggest  that it was  a  juvenile.  The larger species of long-toms of the North West Shelf  waters  can  grow  to  lengths  of  1.3-1.5m,  but most seen would  average  around 1m   (Barry  Hutchins,   Western   Australian Museum,  pers. commun.). Scaling from  the photographs,  using this knowledge  and  that of  the visible platform  support  dimensions, suggests  that this dugong was most  probably <_1.5m  in  length. It certainly was  not  more than   2m.  Sex  could  not   be   determined, because all observations were made from  the platform deck (18m above water).

          Apart   from  the  photography   mentioned   above,  some  other   more   detailed observations    of   behavior   patterns    were planned   for  the  dugong's  later  period   of residence around the Vicksburg. Unfortunately, the animal's disappearance prevented this. However, it was noted to spend a lot of  time suspended  inactive below the surface  in  the upper  water  column. At other times  it  was seen  rolling about; the observers  considered this may have been "playing".

          On   other  occasions  it   disappeared from  the  observers' view,  during  some  of which  times  it could have drifted  under  the platform out of sight. It might also have been diving to feed, although the 17m water  depth around the Vicksburg is at the deeper extreme of  known  dugong feeding  range.  Still,  the observers  did not think the dugong  had  lost body  condition  during its time  at  the  platform.

          One  other  lone  Western   Australian dugong is known to have associated for about 7  days  in  mid-January  1989  with  a  large (29.8m,   372-tonne)  moored   tugboat,   the Pilbara Sun, in Dampier Harbour (20°39'  S, 116°42'  E). Water temperatures in  Dampier Harbour  during this period were reported  to have varied between 26 and 31°C.

          The Pilbara Sun dugong was certainly a  young, unweaned calf (photo estimate,  ca. 1.1m   in  length).  Its  mother,   which   had apparently  been  feeding on  a  seagrass  bed directly behind the boat pen, had been  killed beforehand  by the same tug  when  reversing from  its mooring for work. The carcass  was unsalvageable,    being    mutilated    beyond recognition by the propeller impact.

          Unfortunately,   formal  reporting   of this fatal collision, and the subsequent orphan calf/tug  association,  was  not  made  until  a week  after  the event.  The  movements  that had  been observed meanwhile of the  orphan back and forth alongside the tug suggested  it was   seeking   milk.  Nothing   further   was learned from this association because the  calf disappeared   overnight  almost   immediately after   the  report  was  made.  Starvation   or shark   attack  may  have  caused  its   disappearance.   -  Robert I. T. Prince  (Wildlife Research  Centre, Dept. of Conservation  and Land Management, P. O. Box 51, Wanneroo 6065),   Martin   Rawlings   (c/o    Atwood Oceanics  Australia Pty. Ltd., 35 Peel  Road, O'Connor   6163),   and   Roberta    Selleck (Western  Mining  Corporation  Ltd.,  P.  O. Box 7660, Perth 6850, Western Australia).

 

BELIZE

 

          Manatee  Butchering Sites  in  Port Honduras. - In the tranquil waters of  southern  Belize,  there lies a serious threat  to  the existence of the manatee.  Fishermen in  Port Honduras are killing manatees at an alarming rate.   This activity was recently made  public through   reports   generated  by   the   Belize Center  for Environmental Studies. Last  year four  manatee  skeletons were  discovered  in the  area  of Deep Creek, in the  Toledo  District of Belize.  At that time it was  suspected that some opportunistic butchering was taking

place;  however, the magnitude of the  recent killing was not apparent until now. 

          With  funding graciously provided  by the    Smithsonian   Institution    Biodiversity Program,  we  went to Belize in  late  August and early September 1995 to conduct dolphin and manatee research.  While there, we  were able to fly several aerial surveys and  counted 109  manatees  at selected survey  sites.   The total  number  of  manatees in  Belize  is  not known,  but  is  assumed  to  be  around  200 animals.   During  an  aerial  survey  of  Port Honduras  we counted 4 manatees.  There  is excellent habitat for a local population in  the protected cays, adjacent Deep Creek and  Rio Hondo  rivers, and Icacos Lagoon.   A  large number  of  manatees were  observed  to  the north  in nearby Placencia Lagoon  where  37 individuals  were counted.  The  presence  of this  large  group  of  manatees  in  the  north could  be  responsible for  migratory  animals occasionally  moving  south  into  Port  Honduras.   These  animals could  easily  become victims of the illicit poaching operation. 

          During boat surveys of Port Honduras with   local   fishermen,  we   discovered   11 separate  butchering sites, which contained  a minimum of 35 manatee carcasses.   Twenty-four  skeletons were classified as adults,  and the  remaining  11  were  either  juveniles  or calves.  Detailed studies of the skeletal  material collected from each site will be  conducted.    Evidence   of  recent   butchering   was apparent,  and  we were watched  by  hungry John  Crows  (vultures)  as  they  sat  in   the nearby trees.  Some of the decaying flesh was still  attached  to  the  bones.   One  site  was known  to be two to three years old, while  at least  two  of  the sites were  active  and  had been used within the last month. 

          Many   of  the  skulls  examined   had large, deep cut marks in the cranial bones.  It was  apparent  that the manatees  were  either shot,  harpooned, or chased  until  exhausted, then brought close to the boat and  dispatched with  heavy  machete blows to  the  head  and nose.   Carcasses would then be taken  to  the nearest  dry land site, and under the cover  of heavy vegetation or nightfall, the meat would be   removed.   It  would  then  be  taken   to market and illegally sold.

          No  manatee  meat  was  observed   in markets in Belize; however, there are several rumors that the meat can occasionally be purchased in Guatemala.  It is likely that fishermen from Guatemala are coming into  Belize, killing  the  manatees,  and  taking  the  meat back  to  Guatemala  to  sell.   Manatees   are protected  in both Belize and Guatemala,  but there  is  little or no enforcement  of  existing laws.  The direct impact that this poaching  is having on the local population in south Belize is not known, but the magnitude of this activity  clearly  puts  excessive  pressure  on  this population.   Immediate measures need to  be taken   to  enforce  existing  laws   protecting manatees, and ensure that all poaching activities are stopped as soon as possible.

          Additional information regarding  this investigation  can  be obtained  by  contacting either the Fisheries or Forestry  Departments, Belize  City,  Belize, or the  Sirenia  Project, Gainesville,   Florida,  USA.  -  Robert   K. Bonde (Sirenia Project) and Charley  Potter (Smithsonian Institution)

 

 

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

 

          Stranded  Manatee Calf Rescued.  - In  late  March  1995,  a  manatee  calf   was stranded   alive   at   Barahona,    Dominican Republic,  after fishermen killed  its  mother. The  dehydrated  and  anemic  70-pound  calf was discovered by Tropescar Sur, a nonprofit animal-welfare  organization, and rescued  by a  team  from the Acuario Nacional  in  Santo Domingo, led by Enrique Pugibet and  Mo'nica Vega. Antonio Mignucci from the  Caribbean Stranding Network in Puerto Rico was  called in for expert advice, and the baby manatee  is now  doing well on a diet of goat's milk  and soy milk.

          The  calf was christened  Tamaury  in memory of Tammy Dominguez and  Amaury Villalba, who were recently killed in a  plane crash  during a manatee survey (see notice  in this issue).

          The  fishermen who killed the  mother were caught and fined, but the applicable law dates  from 1960 and the amount of  the  fine was   inconsequential.    -    (source:   Alerta Neptuno   [Caribbean   Stranding    Network] 2(2), June 1995.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EAST AFRICA AND MADAGASCAR

 

          Aerial Survey in Kenya Finds  Few Dugongs.   -  From  17-24  November, the Kenya Wildlife Service, in collaboration with UNEP  OCA/PAC, IUCN's Regional  Office for  Eastern Africa, and Eden Wildlife  Trust carried  out an intensive aerial survey of  500 km  of  Kenya's  shoreline  to  determine  the distribution  of sea turtles, dugongs,  whales, dolphins,  and  whale  sharks.  Five   aircraft were  used  over  a period of  seven  days.  A total  of  254  hours  were  spent  in  the  air, doing  1  km-wide transects out to the  30  m depth contour.

          Sea   turtles,   dolphins,   and    whale sharks  were  found to be  evenly  distributed along  the  coast  within  a  depth  of  20   m. Dugongs  were found only in  Ungwana  Bay and Manda Bay in Lamu, however, and  only 16  animals  were sighted, indicating  a  very small   population.  Survey   participant   Vic Cockcroft estimates a population of about  50 dugongs  for the whole of Kenya;  and  based mainly on anecdotal data from interviews, he doubts that there are more than 2000 dugongs in  the  western Indian Ocean,  excluding  the Arabian Gulf.

          "Our  results  demonstrated  that   sea turtles  and dugongs are the  most  vulnerable of   the  animals  covered,"  reports   George Wamukoya, a marine botanist with the Kenya Wildlife Service. "This is probably the  result of  habitat  destruction  and  human  activities such   as  poaching  and  disposal  of   plastic wastes.  If we are to conserve  these  species, we need to protect key turtle nesting areas  in Ras   Tenewi  and  Shella,  and   the   known dugong   habitats  in  Ungwana  and   Manda bays."  

          On   related   topics,   Vic   Cockcroft reports that he has just obtained funding from WWF  International  for  a  coastal  zone  assessment    for   Madagascar,    including    a comprehensive  assessment of  dugong  status there.  He is now seeking money for a  compr