Sirenews (ISSN 1017-3439) appears twice a year

in April and October and is edited by Daryl P. Domning,

Department of Anatomy, Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059  USA

(fax: 1-202-265-7055). It is supported by the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission

and Sea World, Inc.

 

 

NUMBER 26                                                                                        OCTOBER 1996

 

 

IN THIS ISSUE:      -  AFRICAN MANATEES CAPTURED FOR DISPLAY BY

                                     JAPANESE AQUARIUM  (p. 4)

 

                               -   DUGONG BITES MAN  (p. 7)

 

                               -   SIRENIAN BIBLIOGRAPHY APPEARS AT LAST  (p. 8)

 

 

GOING ...  GOING ...  DUGONG:

CAN AUSTRALIA MEET ITS INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS

FOR CONSERVING DUGONGS IN THE GREAT BARRIER REEF REGION?

 

     Since  the  first  international  dugong workshop held in Townsville in  1979,  it  has  been recognized  that Australian initiatives are vital if dugongs are to be conserved. Australia  has  a special  responsibility  for  dugong conservation as it provides one of the  last  strongholds  for dugong populations. Elsewhere in the dugong's range, some local populations have been extirpated, and where it still occurs in developing countries, remnant populations are under increasing  pressure. Australia is a developed country with a relatively small human  population,  particularly  in the north where dugongs occur. Our capacity to conserve dugongs should be  good in  the Great Barrier Reef region. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is the  largest  multiple-use  marine  protected  area  in the world and a World Heritage Site.  The  importance  of  this region  as a dugong habitat was one of the reasons it was inscribed on the World Heritage  List in  1981. If we cannot manage to conserve dugongs in the Great Barrier Reef region, then it  is unlikely that they will survive anywhere else.


     In the October 1995 issue of Sirenews, I reported that, although dugong numbers appear to have been stable over the last decade in the remote parts of the Great Barrier Reef region, they have  declined over much of the urban coast by approximately 50% over the past  eight  years. Over a large section of the region, this decline is over 80%.

     This  massive decline in dugong numbers means that the dugong qualifies for  classification as  "critically  endangered" over much of the urban east coast of  Queensland.  Anecdotal  evidence from scientists and traditional hunters suggests that this decline has been occurring  since the 1960s or even earlier.

     Statistics  collected by the Queensland Shark Protection Program reinforce this  conclusion. Since  shark  nets were introduced for bather protection in the 1960s, 541 dugongs  have  been caught in the Great Barrier Reef region, most in the early years of the program. A total of 241 dugongs were caught near Townsville and 161 off Cairns, the area where there are now so few dugongs that the population cannot be estimated.

     The  decline  in  dugong numbers along the east coast of  Queensland  is  embarrassing  for Australia, which has responsibility for conserving dugongs under several international  conventions. Australia also has a national responsibility to conserve dugongs for future generations  of Australians,  especially Indigenous Australians, for whom the dugong has special cultural  significance.

     It  is  widely recognized that dugong meat and oil are among the most  valuable  traditional foods  of  coastal  Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in  northern  Australia.  Most  people assume that traditional hunting is the most serious human impact on dugongs in Australia.  But the  situation  is  clearly  much more complicated than this in the  Great  Barrier  Reef  region. Dugongs are vulnerable to two broad classes of impacts:

   _  those  that  kill  animals directly, for example netting,  traditional  hunting,  or  large-scale losses of seagrass; and

   _  those that decrease the calving rate by reducing feeding opportunities, for example smaller-scale habitat loss or boat traffic.

     Even  though  Tony  Preen and Paul Anderson have discovered  that  dugongs  supplement their  seagrass  diet with invertebrate animals at the subtropical limits of their  range,  they  are essentially  seagrass  specialists.  This  dependence on seagrass  means  that  dugongs  have  an obligatory  association  with coastal habitats, which are vulnerable to the  impacts  of  extreme weather  events  and  to human activities such as hunting,  fishing,  coastal  development,  and unsustainable agricultural practices.

     Since  they  became aware of the decline of the dugong in the southern Great  Barrier  Reef region, most of the Indigenous Councils of Elders that control traditional hunting in this region have voluntarily agreed not to harvest dugongs, and there is currently no permitted hunting  on the  urban  coast. One Aboriginal Corporation recently signed an historic  agreement  with  the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority stating that it would be inappropriate for Indigenous hunting to occur within their local area.

     It  is  now  up  to other stakeholder groups to respond to  the  challenge  of  reducing  their impacts  on  dugongs,  and  there has been major media  pressure  on  the  commercial  fishing industry to reduce their dugong bycatch. So far this year, Janet Slater of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has collated reports of 23 dugong carcasses, at least 10 and possibly  14 of  which  were suspected net kills. As a result, dugongs have been front-page  news  in  many regional  newspapers  in  Queensland for several weeks, and serious concern  is  at  last  being expressed  about the problem. I was even flown to Sydney to brief the Australian Minister  for the Environment in person.

     The Queensland Commercial Fishermen's Organisation has publicly acknowledged that  the incidental  capture and drowning of dugongs in mesh nets is a problem. This  organization  has supported the development of an education program to inform commercial fishers on aspects of dugong  conservation biology and management and on methods to minimize dugong take. It  is hoped  that  attendance  at this program will become part of  the  Trainee  Master  Fisherman's course and compulsory for Master Fishermen who wish to fish using mesh nets. This  initiative is important as many fishers do not appreciate the seriousness of the "Dugong Problem" or  the way it threatens the future of mesh netting as a commercial fishing method in the Great Barrier Reef region. However, I consider that education alone will not be enough.

     Given  the  large number of net fishers and vessels involved in the industry on  a  part-time basis,  an  observer program to obtain statistics on the numbers of dugongs  drowned  in  mesh nets  on the east coast of Queensland would be expensive and logistically difficult. Solution  of this  problem  requires a multifaceted joint approach by the relevant  Queensland  and  national agencies and the commercial fishing industry. I have assessed the comparative risk of  dugongs drowning in mesh nets in various sectors of the Queensland coast on the basis of dugong density,  mesh  net density, and enforcement capability as a first stage in developing a  strategy  for reducing  the bycatch of dugongs. An urgent solution is required to avoid  further  polarization of  the stakeholders involved in the problem and to minimize the further impacts of  mesh  netting on dugongs on the east coast of Queensland.

     The  Queensland  Shark Protection Program is also being reviewed to  address  bycatch  issues. Baited lines, which do not catch marine mammals, have replaced nets at many beaches in the  Great Barrier Reef region in recent years, but nets remain at several locations. A  decision to replace all nets with baited lines would be controversial, as some scientists believe that  nets as  well as lines are needed if inshore shark numbers are to be maintained at a level  where  the risk  of  their attacking people is acceptably low. Other scientists consider that any  bycatch  of marine  mammals in shark nets is unacceptable in a World Heritage Area, given the  extremely low risk of a bather being attacked by a shark.

     The  greatest  challenge  will  be the conservation of inshore seagrass  beds  in  the  region. Experience  has  shown  that it is hard to convince a prospective developer  that  a  resort  may have  adverse  impacts  on  dugongs and their habitats. It will be  even  harder  to  convince  a farmer  that erosion from his property may threaten the survival of sea cows grazing  on  submarine pastures many kilometers downstream!  -  Helene Marsh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(cartoons reprinted from The Daily Mercury, Sept. 1996)

 

 

NEW JOURNAL

 

     A new periodical which can be expected to include sirenian items on a regular basis  began publication  in  June  1996.  Entitled  Manati:  Zeitschrift  des  Vereins  der  Tiergartenfreunde Nürnberg  e.  V.  und des Tiergartens der Stadt Nürnberg, it is the official  publication  of  the Nuremberg  Zoological Garden, which has been so successful in breeding West  Indian  manatees.  According to a notice in Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 38(1), the new  journal's  first issue  begins  with a general account of the animal by Prof. Dr. H.  F.  Moeller  (Heidelberg), and  also  includes  a report on seacows by Dr.  B.  Blaszkiewitz  (Berlin-Friedrichsfelde)  (see Recent  Literature,  below).  Other  articles cover a variety  of  other  animal  species.  Manati supersedes  the  earlier  series  entitled Tiergarten Aktuell  (1985-1995),  and  its  first  volume accordingly receives the number 11.

 

 

THANKS AGAIN, SEA WORLD!

 

     Sea  World, Inc. has once more assisted the publication of Sirenews with a contribution  of $1000.  On  behalf  of the Sirenia Specialist Group and IUCN, we thank Sea  World  and  Dan Odell for their generous support.

 

 

LOCAL NEWS

 

FLORIDA

 

     Manatee   Die-off  Attributed   to   Red Tide.  -  The  disastrous  mass  mortality   of manatees  that occurred in southwest  Florida between 5 March and 27 April 1996 has been officially  diagnosed  as  the  result  of  a  red tide,  according  to a 2 July press  release  by the   Florida  Department  of   Environmental Protection (FDEP).

     The  die-off  involved the deaths  of  some 158  Florida manatees whose  carcasses  were recovered  between  Englewood in  the  north and Marco Island in the south.

     The  announcement  came as  the  conclusion  to four months of intensive research  by state,   federal,  and  international   agencies, which ruled out other possible causes such  as infectious diseases, parasites, and  man-made toxins. The dead manatees' nutritional  condition   was  good  and  there  was  no   visible trauma,  meaning  that  cold  stress  and  boat strikes were not to blame.

     Evidently  the animals died as a  result  of inhaling  and/or ingesting high levels  of  red tide   toxin  (brevetoxin)  while   feeding   on seagrasses  and  associated  organisms  which may have concentrated the poison. FDEP red tide  specialist Dr. Karen Steidinger,  writing in  the  Save  the  Manatee  Club   Newsletter (Sept.  1996),  suggested  that  four   unusual circumstances   coincided  to  precipitate   the unusual  mortality. First, early 1996  brought some  of  the coldest  temperatures  in  recent history to the area, causing large numbers  of manatees  to congregate in warm-water  refugia  up  the  Caloosahatchee  River.  Second, there  was a warming period when  the  manatees  dispersed  into Pine Island  Sound  and Matlacha Pass. Third, there were high  salinities  at the mouth of the  Caloosahatchee  and throughout Pine Island Sound, which favored the  survival of the dinoflagellates that  cause red   tide.  Fourth,  from  the   beginning   of March  to  the  end  of  April,  the  red   tide concentrations  in the area were high  enough to  kill fish and the highest they had  been  in the area at that time of year since 1982, when the other circumstances also co-occurred  and a similar manatee die-off took place. Steidinger  speculates  that  when  the  manatees  dispersed  down  the  Caloosahatchee,  they  encountered the hot zone of red tide,  triggering the mass mortality.

     Prior   to  this  die-off,  the   most   recent population   estimates   indicated   a   Florida manatee  population of over 2600. As  of  16 October, 369 manatees have died in the  state this year, including the 158 attributed to  this event.  This far exceeds the  previous  record set  in  1990,  when  a  total  of  206  Florida manatees died in the entire year.

 

 

GUINEA BISSAU

 

          African   Manatees   Captured   for Display. - Reports have reached us that  two West   African  manatees  were  captured   in Guinea  Bissau  this past summer  by  a  team from the Toba Aquarium in Japan, where the animals are destined for public display. These would  be  the first specimens  of  Trichechus senegalensis  displayed in a  public  aquarium in  many years, and they would join  the  pair of   dugongs  already  in  captivity  at   Toba. However,  no further details were  obtainable from the Toba Aquarium or other sources  as of  press  time.  We hope  to  provide  a  full report in our next issue.

 

 

 

INDIA

 

     The Vanishing Mermaids of  Andaman and  Nicobar  Islands. - In the  recent  past, the  urgent need to study the seagrass  habitat and its associated animal life in Andaman and Nicobar was felt by several workers. Thus,  a study  was  initiated by Salim Ali  Centre  for Ornithology and Natural History with  financial  support from the Ministry  of  Environment  and  Forests, Government of  India,  in order  to evaluate the habitat status,  resource potential,   and  conservation  value   of   this unique ecosystem.

     Seagrasses   being  its  staple   food,   the dugong   is  intimately  associated   with   the seagrass habitat. Once widely distributed, the dugong  has disappeared from many parts  of its  realm and is under serious threat in  most of  the remaining area. In India,  the  dugong occurs in the Gulf of Kutch, Gulf of Mannar, Palk Bay, and Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The  latter  islands have large  areas  of  seagrass,  rich in diversity, flourishing in  clear, relatively low-nutrient coastal waters.

     The primary objective of the study was to identify  the  potential  seagrass  habitats   for conservation,    but   information    regarding dugongs   was  also  collected.   Surveys   by motor boat and rowboat in Ritchies  Archipelago,  North  Reef, Marine  National  Park  - Wandoor, and off Diglipur during 1994,  and Little  Andaman, Camorta, Pilomilow,  Little Nicobar  and  Great  Nicobar  islands  during January  and  March  1995  failed  to   locate dugongs.   These  surveys  were   undertaken without  any  particular pattern and  with  the help of the local hunters and fishermen  from morning  to  evening.  The  main  source   of information  was  interviews  with  the   local tribes  and  settlers. As  dugong  poaching  is illegal,  the local fishermen were reluctant  to share  information. Therefore  the  interviews were  done  informally.  On  two   occasions, bones could be examined.

     Dugongs were common in the 1950s,  but the  population has dropped drastically in  the recent  past, as evidenced by  sporadic  sightings  and  rare records of poaching.  Most  of the  tribes, namely Andamanese,  Onges  and Nicobares,  traditionally  hunt  dugongs  with iron   harpoons  tied  to  the  boat   (dunghi). Shompens  have no knowledge about  dugong hunting,  and  hostile tribes  (Sentinalese  and Jarawas)   were   not   interviewed.   Settlers, although   they  have  no   knowledge   about hunting,  at  times get the animals  in  fishing nets  close  to  seagrass  beds.  None  of   the tribes,  except Andamanese of  Strait  Island, go  on regular hunts because of the  time  and effort it takes to catch a dugong. The  settlers from   mainland  India  are   mostly   Hindus (Bengali- and Hindi-speaking) and do not like dugong  meat as it looks and tastes like  beef; so  the  killing  is  always  unintentional.   To avoid   legal  problems  they  hand  over   the animals to the tribes who are exempted  from the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972.

     The  fishermen had sighted  five  dugongs on separate occasions between 1990 and 1994 along   the  northwestern  side   of   Camorta Island,  five near Dugong Creek  and  Hutby, and  four  each  in Little  Nicobar  and  Great Nicobar islands. Besides those in the southern Andaman   Islands,  dugongs  were  seen   by fishermen and local residents around Ritchies Archipelago  on  at least five  separate  occasions during 1990-1994. Most sightings  took place in seagrass beds during high tides in the early evening.

     The  primary  reason for the  decrease  in the dugong population in this island group  is habitat loss, which has resulted from  increasingly  heavy  boat traffic and faulty  land  use practices  such  as  conversion  of  forests  to banana,  areca  nut and  coconut  plantations. Natural  calamities  like  cyclones  and  high-energy  tidal  storms may also  be  partly  responsible.   In  fact,  a  wounded   and   dead dugong   was  noticed  by  Andaman   Public Works  Department workers near  Pilo  Kunji on  Great  Nicobar Island after  a  cyclone  in July 1989.

     The study concludes that dugongs are less abundant  than  in the recent  past.  Although dugong   numbers  are  greatly  reduced   and large populations are no longer seen, dugongs still exist at least around Ritchies  Archipelago,  North Reef, Little  Andamans,  Camorta (Allimpong and Pilpilow), Little Nicobar and parts of Great Nicobar islands. The best  way to  protect dugongs in these island  groups  is by:  (1)  initiating  education  programs,   (2) identification  and  conservation  of  potential habitats,  (3)  enforcing  strict  legislation   to protect  dugongs, and (4) regular  monitoring by  government  and  non-government  agencies.   The  study  also  advocates  an   aerial survey  of  dugong populations  to  determine their  exact status and  long-term  monitoring thereafter.  -  H. S. Das (Scientist,  Wetland Ecology   Division,  Salim  Ali   Centre   for Ornithology  and Natural  History,  Kalampalayam, Coimbatore 641 010, India)

 

KENYA

 

     Dugong Festival Week Raises  Awareness. - The Sea Turtle/Dugong  Conservation Committee, comprising representatives  from the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), Fisheries Department,  Coast  Development  Authority (CDA), National Museums of Kenya (NMK), Wildlife  Clubs  of Kenya  (WCK),  hoteliers and individual conservationists, in  collaboration with the Dugong Inter-Agency  Advisory Committee  comprising  KWS,  World  Wide Fund  for Nature (WWF),  Japanese  International  Cooperation  Agency  (JICA),  WCK, East  Africa Wildlife Society (EAWS),  Fisheries  Department, United Nations  Environment Programme (UNEP), World  Conservation Union (IUCN), Africa Wildlife  Foundation  (AWF),  Eden  Wildlife  Trust  (EWT), and  CDA,  organized a  Dugong  Awareness Festival Week, 22-27 April 1996.

     The aims of the festival were to:

     (1) raise public awareness concerning  the plight of dugongs among fishermen and  local communities;

     (2) obtain information from the fishermen and  local  people on the  occurrence  of  dugongs;

     (3)  involve the coastal people in  dugong conservation by introducing them to measures they  can implement to curb dugong  mortality; and

     (4) seek the views of fishermen on appropriate ways to enhance dugong conservation.

     During   the  festival  week,  a  series   of meetings was held in the key fishing  villages along  the Kenya coast. Seminars  and  workshops,  together  with  audio-visual  presentations,  were the main modes  of  communication during the one-week awareness program, which  saw  the conservationists  move  from Vanga   Ngomeni,  Kipini,   Lamu,   Takwa, Pate,     Kizingitini,    Kinyaole     (Robinson Island),   and   other  fishing   villages.   The coordination team was led by the chairman of the  Kenya Sea  Turtle/Dugong  Conservation Project,  Mr. George Wamukoya, with  Eden Wildlife Trust (EWT) supporting the  ground logistics  by providing transport. The  awareness    team   comprised   Kakuko    Nagatani (WCK),  George  Wamukoya  (KWS),   Jane Mbendo  (Fisheries  Dept.),  Said   Mwaguni (CDA),   Hassan   Mohammed   (Fort   Jesus Museum),   Fakih  Mbwana   (KWS),   Sirya Karisa (KWS), and Joseph Eriya  (volunteer). Dugong  posters created a lot  of  enthusiasm among the local people, as many of them had not seen a dugong before.

     In  most of the fishing villages,  the  local communities  pledged  to  form  conservation subcommittees,  which will serve to  monitor dugong  movements  and  their   conservation needs  and those of other endangered  species such as sea turtles. This will make it easier to control  poaching  of  these  animals.   Model subcommittees  are  operating  in  Kipini  and Lamu,  whereas in Ngomeni and  Kizingitini, the conservation subcommittee modalities are being  worked  out. The  interaction  between the awareness team and the fishermen yielded useful  information  on  dugong  sightings  in areas such as Vanga, Watamu, and Ngomeni, which  had  been presumed to  have  depleted their  local  stocks.  Appropriate  surveillance mechanisms  have been put in place  in  these areas  for monitoring of  dugong  movements by the local people.

     The climax of the festival week was  held in  Lamu town on 27 April 1996. Before  the public  rally, a series of entertainment  activities  was  organized by the  Lamu  organizing committee.  First,  a  peaceful  demonstration was   organized  along  Lamu   streets,   with participants  carrying  posters  of  "Save   the Dugong"  and  singing in  praise  of  dugongs and  the need to conserve them. Other  events which   marked  the  highly   successful   day included   a  swimming   competition,   dhow race,  donkey race, and poetry  recitals.  The latter was directly relevant to the plight of the "mermaids",  whose numbers  have  dropped drastically from about five hundred in the last decade  to only six at last count  in  February 1996.  The  most characteristic event,  and  a crowd  puller,  was the  donkey  race,  which was won by a standard six pupil from  Manda Primary  School, "Jockey"  Kassim  Athman, who   shrugged   off  stiff   competition   and marshaled  the  donkey to a first  finish  after being  flagged  off  by  Dr.  Monica  Borobia (UNEP OCA/PAC). Cash prizes were  given as rewards for the winners, and this served as a great incentive to the participants.

     The guest of honor was the KWS  Deputy Director, Biodiversity, Mr. Wilbur Ottichilo, together with a high-powered delegation from KWS  headquarters  including  the   Assistant Director in charge of Community  Programmes  Mrs. Agnes Masika. In attendance  also were  the  DC, Lamu and  representatives  of UNEP, WCK, JICA, NMK, CDA,  Fisheries Department, WWF, and the local community leaders.  Mr. Ottichilo underscored  the  need to integrate the local communities in  conservation  activities  and  applauded  the  coastal people  for their support and the  pivotal  role they continue to play in dugong and sea turtle conservation.   He   pledged   the   continued support of KWS in community-based projects which will enhance the sustainable use of  the marine  resources, with a view to raising  the living standards of the coastal communities.

     From the festival week, it is crystal  clear that  the English/Swahili dugong posters  and audio-visual  presentations and the  mammoth crowd that attended the Lamu function created  significant awareness about  dugongs  and their   conservation  obligations   among   the coastal  communities.  The  community  suggested   that  the  Dugong  Festival  be   held annually  as  a  way of  sensitizing  the  local people, particularly fishermen, on their  roles and  support  in  dugong  conservation.   This will enhance exchange of information on  the few remaining "mermaids" and their  movements.  They also suggested that  participants be  invited  from  Somalia  and  Tanzania   in order  to  strengthen regional efforts  to  conserve   dugongs  and  turtles.   The   Dugong Festival  will  now become an  annual  event, with  the  hope of becoming  a  regional  and international  event.  -  George M.  Wamukoya  (Kenya  Wildlife  Service,  P.O.   Box 82144, Mombasa, Kenya)

 

VANUATU

 

          Dugong    Loses    Patience     with Divers.  - The July 1996 issue  of  Backbone (Newsletter  of the Department of  Vertebrate Zoology,  National Museum of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian Institution, vol. 9,  no.  4, pp. 8-9) carried a report by ichthyologist Jeff Williams  of  an  unusual  encounter  with   a dugong   that  he  and  other  members  of   a Smithsonian   collecting  expedition   had   in May-June  1996.  It  is  reprinted  here   with permission.

          "A  village  at  the  southeast  end   of Tanna advertises a dugong as a tourist  attraction. We anchored in the harbor, just off  the village,  to  seek  shelter  from  the   constant ocean   swells   and  were  told   by   Captain Hendry  [Taiford] that a male dugong  comes up  to  the beach in front  of  our  anchorage. While  swimming out from the boat to find  a good  place to collect fish,  Mark  [Westneat] met  the  dugong and Jeff  [Williams]  joined them  near the front of the boat. The  dugong was  very calm and gentle,  probably  curious to see people staying underwater and blowing air  bubbles out of funny looking  mouthpieces.  He  soon left us and we continued  on  to collect  some  fish. But that was not  the  last time  Jeff would see this dugong. That  afternoon at a collecting station near the mouth of the harbor, Jeff was attacked by the  dugong. He was evidently not pleased that divers were swimming  around  in his  territory!  At  first Jeff  thought  the dugong  was  gently  hitting him  on the back with his flipper, but  it  was soon  clear after a couple of full  body  slams that Jeff was not welcome! After taking cover in   coral  crevices  a  couple  of  times,   Jeff finally  managed  to slip away  from  the  big guy.  Although we could hear the  dugong[']s high pitched call (warning?), he left us  alone for  a while, but Jeff was  constantly  looking over his shoulder to see if he was going to be attacked   again.  Sure  enough,  just   before dark,  the dugong swooped in and  gave  Jeff another slap on the back.

          "Jeff hid in a coral cave and when the dugong crossed over the reef, Jeff decided  to call   it  quits  and  headed  up  to  the   boat. During  that dive, the dugong  attacked  Jeff, Mark and Di [Bray], but Dave [Smith]  never even saw it."

          In a conversation, Williams added that the dugong had put Mark Westneat's  shoulder  in  his mouth and  jerked  him  backward, leaving  the  shoulder  sore  for  a  couple  of days.

          As more and more people start  diving in  waters  inhabited by dugongs,  more  such incidents can be anticipated. So far no one  is known  to  have been seriously  injured  by  a dugong,  but divers should be aware  that  (to quote  Paul  Anderson)  the dugong  is  not  a manatee,  and the placid, gentle image  associated  with  the  Florida  manatee  may   not apply to a territorial male dugong armed with sharp  tusks. Though not replicated by  recent scientific  observations, accounts do  exist  of bull dugongs disembowelling a shark with the tusks (J. Promus, 1937, Walkabout 3(5):  40-41)  and nearly killing a crocodile by  repeatedly jumping out of the water and landing  on top  of it (G. H. Sunter, 1937, Adventures  of a Trepang Fisher, London, Hurst & Blackett, p.  60). Believe these stories or not, but  treat dugongs  (and all large marine animals)  with respect!

          Williams'   testimony  that  the   same animal  on the same day  behaved  differently in different locations certainly suggests  some form of territoriality. What resource might  it have  been defending? Is it possible that  dugongs  in  Vanuatu,  as at  Shark  Bay,  form leks?  -  DPD

 

WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

     Sirenian   Bibliography   Published.   - Domning's  Bibliography  and  Index  of  the Sirenia  and Desmostylia has finally (!)  been published  as Number 80 in the series  Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology. It is an exhaustive,  annotated and  indexed  compilation  of  500 years of  scientific  and  popular literature  on the biology,  paleobiology,  and ethnobiology of sirenians and  desmostylians. It  also includes appendices on serial  publications  devoted to Sirenia,  additional  sources on the history of sirenian studies and  conservation,  coins  and postage  stamps  depicting sirenians,  and  the  classification,   complete synonymy,  and  scientific  nomenclature   of sirenians and desmostylians.

          Since  the Smithsonian does not  retail its  series  publications to the general  public, the  Save  the Manatee Club  (SMC)  has  obtained  a limited supply of copies for  sale  to individuals.    The    retail   price    is    only US$25.00  per  copy  for  this  611-page  volume.  To order, please contact the  Save  the Manatee  Club, 500 N. Maitland Ave.,  Maitland,  Florida  32751, USA  (phone:  1-800-432-5646).

          Some  of you placed your orders  long ago  and  have  experienced a  long  delay  in having them filled. Please don't blame SMC: it  was the Smithsonian that fumbled the  ball and delayed filling SMC's order for two  and a half months after publication! However, the books have now been shipped to Florida, and orders should be filled promptly from here on out.

          Since many active workers on  sirenians are located in countries whence purchases in U.S. dollars are difficult or  impossible, I have also made alternative arrangements  so that this important research tool can be available to those who may have the greatest  need for  it.  If  you are unable  to  remit  in  U.S. dollars,  please  write to the  Remington  Kellogg Library of Marine Mammalogy, National  Museum of Natural History,  Washington, DC  20560, USA, and request a copy  of  the bibliography. If you can pay in U.S.  dollars, please  order  from  SMC  and  help  support manatee research!  -  DPD

 

          Manatee Postage Stamp. - The  first U.S.  postage  stamp depicting  a  sirenian  is now  available.  The 32-cent blue  and  green stamp,  part of a sheet of 15 designs  portraying   15  different  endangered  species,   was issued  in San Diego on 2 October as  part  of National Stamp Collecting Month.

          Of  historical  interest is the  fact  that the  design of the Florida manatee stamp  was changed  in response to public criticism.  The original design was taken from a  photograph by  wildlife  photographer  James  Balog  and showed  a ventral view of the head and  chest of  a manatee calf at Sea World  in  Orlando, propped up in a sitting position. The resulting portrait,  dominated by rolls of blubber,  was deemed  unaesthetic by many  manatee  fans, so  the  Postal  Service  sent  Balog  back   to Florida for more pictures. Finally chosen was a more conventional view of two manatees in a tank at Lowry Park Zoo in Tampa.

          When  interviewed by  the  newspaper Florida  Today, which was highly  critical  of the  original design, Balog explained  that  he had  initially sought to capture the animal  on film  in an unusual way. He commented  that Americans always prefer their art to be in  an unchallenging   form.   "Here,   we'd   rather consume the very familiar, very comfortable, very  familiar  things  and not  have  to  think very   hard,"   he   said.    -    (Source:   The Washington Post, 3 May 1996.)

 

ABSTRACTS

 

          The  following abstracts are of papers and posters presented at the XXI Reunión  Internacional para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Marinos, Chetumal, Mexico, 8-12 April 1996.


MANATEE POPULATION BIOLOGY VOLUME

 

          In  our  last  issue we announced the publication of the workshop  volume  on  manatee population biology edited by O'Shea, Ackerman, and Percival (1995). By request, we  present here  the  complete list of papers included in that volume with their full citations, and  call  the reader's special attention to the two chapters dealing with dugongs.

          Reprints of individual articles may be requested from their respective authors. A supply of the complete volumes is also available; copies may be requested from the addresses below.

 

Dr.  Thomas  O'Shea,  Assistant  Director,  Midcontinent  Ecological  Science  Center, National Biological Service, 4512 McMurry Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80525-3400, USA (ph. +1-303-226-9397, fax +1-303-226-9230, e-mail Tom_O'Shea@nbs.gov)

 

Dr. Bruce Ackerman, Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, 100 Eighth Ave. SE, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA (ph. +1-813-893-2904, e-mail

          ackerman_B@harpo.dep.state.fl.us)

 

Sirenia   Project,   National  Biological  Service,  412  NE  16th   Ave.,   Room   250, Gainesville,  FL  32601, USA (ph. +1-904-372-2571,  fax  +1-904-374-8080,  e-mail Sirenia@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu)      

 

 

O'Shea, T.  J., B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival.  1995.  Introduction.  Pages 1-5 in T.  J. O'Shea,  B.  B.  Ackerman,  and H. F. Percival, eds.   Population  biology  of  the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Reynolds,   J.   E.   III.   1995.   Florida  manatee  population   biology:   research   progress, infrastructure, and applications for conservation and management.  Pages 6-12 in T.  J. O'Shea,  B.  B.  Ackerman,  and H. F. Percival, eds.   Population  biology  of  the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Ackerman,  B. B.  1995.  Aerial surveys of manatees: a summary and progress report.   Pages 13-33  in  T.J.  O'Shea,  B. B. Ackerman, and  H.  F.  Percival,  eds.   Population biology of the Florida manatee.  Natl. Biol. Serv., Inform. and Technol. Report 1.

 

Garrott, R.  A.,  B. B. Ackerman, J. R. Cary, D. M. Heisey, J. E. Reynolds, III,  and  J.  R. Wilcox.  1995.  Assessment in trends in sizes of manatee populations at several Florida aggregation  sites.  Pages 34-55 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F.  Percival, eds.   Population  biology  of  the Florida  manatee.   National  Biological  Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Marsh, H.   1995.   Fixed-width aerial transects for determining dugong population  sizes  and distribution  patterns.   Pages  56-62  in  T.J. O'Shea,  B.  B.  Ackerman,  and  H.  F. Percival,  eds.   Population  biology of the  Florida  manatee.   National  Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Lefebvre,  L. W., B. B. Ackerman, K. M. Portier, and K. H. Pollock.  1995.   Aerial  survey as   a   technique  for  estimating  trends  in  manatee  population   size--problems   and prospects.  Pages 63-74 in T.J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival,  eds.  Population  biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological  Service,  Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Marsh, H.   1995.   The  life  history,  pattern of breeding,  and  population  dynamics  of  the dugong.    Pages  75-83  in  T.J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and  H.  F.  Percival,  eds.  Population  biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological  Service,  Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Hernandez,  P.,  J.  E.  Reynolds,  III,  H.  Marsh,  and  M.  Marmontel.   1995.   Age   and seasonality in spermatogenesis of Florida manatees.  Pages 84-97 in T.J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman,  and  H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of  the  Florida  manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Marmontel, M.  1995.  Age and reproduction in female Florida manatees.  Pages 98-119 in T. J.  O'Shea,  B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, eds.  Population  biology  of  the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Beck, C.  A., and J. P. Reid.  1995.  An automated photo-identification catalog for studies  of the  life  history  of  the  Florida  manatee.  Pages  120-134  in  T.  J.  O'Shea,  B.  B. Ackerman,  and  H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of  the  Florida  manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Rathbun,  G.  B.,  J. P. Reid, R. K. Bonde, and J. A. Powell.  1995.   Reproduction  in  free-ranging Florida manatees.  Pages 135-156 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival,  eds.   Population  biology of the  Florida  manatee  (Trichechus  manatus latirostris).  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

O'Shea, T.  J. and W. C. Hartley.  1995.  Reproduction and early-age survival of manatees  at Blue  Spring,  upper St. Johns River, Florida.  Pages 157- 170 in T. J. O'Shea,  B.  B. Ackerman,  and  H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of  the  Florida  manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Reid, J. P.,  R.  K.  Bonde, and T. J. O'Shea.  1995.  Reproduction  and  mortality  of  radio-tagged  and recognizable manatees on the Atlantic coast of Florida.  Pages  171-191  in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of  the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Odell, D.  K.,  G. D. Bossart, M. T. Lowe, and T. D. Hopkins.  1995.  Reproduction  of  the West Indian manatee in captivity.  (Abstract only).  Pages 192-194 in T. J. O'Shea,  B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of the Florida  manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

O'Shea, T. J., and C. A. Langtimm.  1995.  Estimation of survival of adult Florida  manatees in  the Crystal River, at Blue Spring, and on the Atlantic coast. Pages 194-222 in T.  J. O'Shea,  B.  B.  Ackerman,  and H. F. Percival, eds.   Population  biology  of  the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Ackerman,  B.  B.,  S.  D. Wright, R. K. Bonde, D. K. Odell, and  D.  J.  Banowetz.   1995.  Trends and patterns in mortality of manatees in Florida, 1974- 1992.  Pages 223-258 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of  the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

Wright, S.  D.,  B.  B.  Ackerman, R. K. Bonde, C. A. Beck,  and  D.  J.  Banowetz.   1995.  Analysis of watercraft-related mortality of manatees in Florida, 1979-1991.  Pages 259-268 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, eds.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Inform. and Technol. Report 1.

 

Eberhardt,  L.  L.  and  T.  J. O'Shea.  1995.   Integration  of  manatee  life-history  data  and population  modeling.   Pages  269-279 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman,  and  H.  F. Percival,  eds.   Population  biology of the  Florida  manatee.   National  Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

O'Shea, T.  J.,  and B. B. Ackerman.  1995.  Population biology of the  Florida  manatee:  an overview.   Pages  280-287  in  T. J. O'Shea, B. B.  Ackerman,  and  H.  F.  Percival, eds.   Population  biology  of  the Florida  manatee.   National  Biological  Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

 

RECENT LITERATURE

 

Anonymous.  1996.  Manatees  off.  Sea Frontiers 42(1):  11.   [Update  on  Florida  manatee mortality in 1995.]

 

Ames, A.L.,  and  E.S.  Van  Vleet. 1996. Organochlorine residues  in  the  Florida  manatee, Trichechus manatus latirostris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 32(4): 374-377.

 

Ames, A.L.,  E.S.  Van  Vleet,  and W.M. Sackett. 1996. The use  of  stable  carbon  isotope analysis for determining the dietary habits of the Florida manatee, Trichechus  manatus latirostris. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 12(4): 555-563.

 

Anderson, I. 1996. Aborigines spare the dugong. New Scientist 151(2042): 5.

 

Behler, D.A. 1996. Manatee update. Wildlife Conservation 99(4): 16.  [Report on  "Chessie"'s travels and Spring 1996 manatee die-off.]

 

Blaszkiewitz,  B.  1995. Die Seekuhanlage im Tierpark  Berlin-Friedrichsfelde.  Zool.  Garten (N.F.) 65: 175-181.

 

Blaszkiewitz, B. 1996. Berliner Seekuh-Chronik. Manati 11(1): [pp.?]

 

Blaszkiewitz, B., and R. Reinhard. 1996. Säugetierkundliche Notizen aus indonesischen  Zoos. Milu (Berlin) 8: 875-884.  [Includes photos of a dugong in the Surabaya Zoo.]

 

Depierre,  D.,  and  J.  Vivien. 1992.  Mammifères  sauvages  du  Cameroun.  Fontainebleau, Ministère de la Coopération et du Développement: 1-250.

 

Domning,  D.P.  1996.  Bibliography  and index of the  Sirenia  and  Desmostylia.  Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiol. No. 80: iii + 611.  [See ordering information in this issue.]

 

Fournier,  R.C.  1994.  Siren  of  the sea. Asian Diver Mag.  3(1):  59-63.   [Dugongs  in  the Philippines.]

 

Furusawa,  H. 1996. New material of sirenian fossil from the upper Miocene of  Numata-cho, Hokkaido, Japan. Fossils No. 60: 1-11.  [In Japanese; Engl. summ.]

 

Giffin, E.B.,  and  M.  Gillett.  1996. Neurological  and  osteological  definitions  of  cervical vertebrae in mammals. Brain Behav. Evol. 47(4): 214-218.

 

Graham, M., and P.D. Round. 1994. Thailand's vanishing flora and fauna. Bangkok, Finance One Public Company Ltd.

 

Grigione, M.M. 1996. Observations on the status and distribution of the West African manatee in Cameroon. Afr. Jour. Ecol. 34(2): 189-195.

 

Kataoka,   T.  1994.  Do  dugongs  look  like  mermaids?  The  thorough  comparison  of   the legendary creature and its model animal. Newton Graphic Science Mag. 14(6).

 

Krogh, M., and D. Reid. 1996. Bycatch in the protective shark meshing programme off south-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 77(2-3): 219-226.

 

Leatherwood,  S.M.,  L.L.  Dolar, C.J. Wood, L.V. Aragones, and  C.  Hill.  1992.  Marine mammal species confirmed from Philippine waters. Silliman Journal 36(1): 65-86.

 

Moeller, H.F. 1996. Seekühe - aquatische Weidegänger. Manati 11(1): [pp.?]

 

Pain, S. 1996.  Where  manatees may safely swim. New Scientist No.  2039:  22.   [Describes modifications of flood-control dams in Florida.]

 

Pavlinov,  I.Ya.,  and  S.V.  Kruskop.  1995. [Mammals  of  Eurasia.  III.  Cetacea,  Sirenia: systematic-geographic  guide.]  Archives  of Zool.  Museum,  Moscow  State  University 33(Supplement): 1-32.  [In Russian.]

 

Pervesler, P., R. Roetzel, and F.F. Steininger. 1995. Taphonomie der Sirenen in den marinen Flachwasserablagerungen (Burgschleinitz-Formation, Eggenburgium, Untermiozän) der Gemeindesandgrube  Kühnring (Niederösterreich). Jahrb. Geol.  Bundesanst.  (Vienna) 138(1): 89-121.

 

Pervesler,  P.,  R.  Roetzel,  and F.F. Steininger. 1996. Taphonomy  of  the  sirenians  in  the shallow  marine sediments (Burgschleinitz-Formation, Eggenburgian, Lower  Miocene) of   Kühnring  (Lower  Austria).  Comunicación  de  la  II  Reunión  de  Tafonomía   y Fosilización, 1996: 319-326.  [Summary of Pervesler et al., 1995.]

 

Reynolds,  J.E.,  III, and S.A. Rommel. 1996. Structure and function  of  the  gastrointestinal tract of the Florida manatee, Trichechus manatus latirostris. Anat. Rec. 245: 539-558.

 

Russel, M.  1996. The story of Hou-Manatee. Endangered Species Bull. (U.S. Fish  &  Wildl. Serv.) 21(3): 18-19.  [Describes a manatee rescue near Houston, Texas.]

 

Smith, B.D.,  T.A. Jefferson, D.T. Ho, S. Leatherwood, C.V. Thuoc, M. Andersen,  and  E. Chaim.  1995.  Marine  mammals of Vietnam: a  preliminary  checklist.  Collection  of Marine Research Works 6: 147-176.

 

Thorlacius,  Ö.  1996. Fílar. Náttúrufrædingurinn 65(3-4): 165-177.  [In  Icelandic.  Discusses proboscideans and their relatives.]

 

Tikel, D.,  D.  Blair,  and H.D. Marsh. 1996. Marine mammal faeces as  a  source  of  DNA. Molec. Ecol. 5(3): 456-457.

 

Turner, R.O.  1996. Die-off decimates Florida manatee. Endangered Species Bull. (U.S.  Fish & Wildl. Serv.) 21(3): 27.

 

 

CHANGE OF ADDRESS

 

Jerol Gardner, P. O. Box 320645, Cocoa Beach, Florida 32932-0645, USA

 

 

>>> COPY DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE:  APRIL 1, 1997 <<<

 

The Sirenews fax number is 1-202-265-7055 (USA).

 

Printed on recycled paper with soy ink

 

* * * * *

 

 

 

Read Sirenews on the Internet! Also Florida manatee mortality statistics and other manatee information. Access the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's web site at  www.dep.state.fl.us  and choose "Protected Species Management."

 

 

                                       CONTENTS (ALPHABETICAL)

 

            Ackerman, B. B.  1995.  Aerial surveys of manatees: a summary and progress                   report.  Pages 13-33 in T.J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival,                   editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Ackerman, B. B., S. D. Wright, R. K. Bonde, D. K. Odell, and D. J. Banowetz.                    1995.  Trends and patterns in mortality of manatees in Florida, 1974-                  1992.  Pages 223-258 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F.                   Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Beck, C. A., and J. P. Reid.  1995.  An automated photo-identification catalog                   for studies of the life history of the Florida manatee.  Pages 120-134                   in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.                    Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service,                   Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Eberhardt, L. L. and T. J. O'Shea.  1995.  Integration of manatee life-history                   data and population modeling.  Pages 269-279 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B.                   Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology of the                   Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and                   Technology Report 1.

 

            Garrott, R. A., B. B. Ackerman, J. R. Cary, D. M. Heisey, J. E. Reynolds, III,                   and J. R. Wilcox.  1995.  Assessment in trends in sizes of manatee                   populations at several Florida aggregation sites.  Pages 34-55 in T. J.                   O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology                   of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and                   Technology Report 1.

 

            Hernandez, P., J. E. Reynolds, III, H. Marsh, and M. Marmontel.  1995.  Age                   and seasonality in spermatogenesis of Florida manatees.  Pages 84-97 in                   T.J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population                   biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service,                   Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Lefebvre, L. W., B. B. Ackerman, K. M. Portier, and K. H. Pollock.  1995.                    Aerial survey as a technique for estimating trends in manatee population                   size--problems and prospects.  Pages 63-74 in T.J. O'Shea, B. B.                   Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology of the                   Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and                   Technology Report 1.

 

            Marmontel, M.  1995.  Age and reproduction in female Florida manatees.  Pages                   98-119 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.                    Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service,                   Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Marsh, H.  1995.  Fixed-width aerial transects for determining dugong                   population sizes and distribution patterns.  Pages 56-62 in T.J. O'Shea,                   B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology of the                   Florida manatee.  National Biological Service, Information and                   Technology Report 1.

 

            Marsh, H.  1995.  The life history, pattern of breeding, and population                   dynamics of the dugong.   Pages 75-83 in T.J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman,                   and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.                    National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Odell, D. K., G. D. Bossart, M. T. Lowe, and T. D. Hopkins.  1995.                    Reproduction of the West Indian manatee in captivity.  (Abstract only).                    Pages 192-194 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival,                   editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            O'Shea, T. J., and B. B. Ackerman.  1995.  Population biology of the Florida                   manatee: an overview.  Pages 280-287 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman,                   and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.                    National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            O'Shea, T. J. and W. C. Hartley.  1995.  Reproduction and early-age survival                   of manatees at Blue Spring, upper St. Johns River, Florida.  Pages 157-                  170 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.                    Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service,                   Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            O'Shea, T. J., and C. A. Langtimm.  1995.  Estimation of survival of adult                   Florida manatees in the Crystal River, at Blue Spring, and on the                   Atlantic coast. Pages 194-222 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F.                   Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            O'Shea, T. J., B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival.  1995.  Introduction.                    Pages 1-5 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.                    Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National Biological Service,                   Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Rathbun, G. B., J. P. Reid, R. K. Bonde, and J. A. Powell.  1995.                    Reproduction in free-ranging Florida manatees.  Pages 135-156 in T. J.                   O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, editors.  Population biology

                  of the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris).  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Reid, J. P., R. K. Bonde, and T. J. O'Shea.  1995.  Reproduction and mortality                   of radio-tagged and recognizable manatees on the Atlantic coast of                   Florida.  Pages 171-191 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F.                   Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Reynolds, J. E. III.  1995.  Florida manatee population biology: research                   progress, infrastructure, and applications for conservation and                   management.  Pages 6-12 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F.                   Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.

 

            Wright, S. D., B. B. Ackerman, R. K. Bonde, C. A. Beck, and D. J. Banowetz.                    1995.  Analysis of watercraft-related mortality of manatees in Florida,                   1979-1991.  Pages 259-268 in T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F.                   Percival, editors.  Population biology of the Florida manatee.  National                   Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1.