Sirenews (ISSN 1017-3439) appears twice a year

in April and October and is edited by Daryl P. Domning,

Department of Anatomy, Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059  USA

(fax: 1-202-265-7055). It is supported by the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission

and Sea World, Inc.

 

 

NUMBER 27                                                                                              APRIL 1997

 

 

IN THIS ISSUE:      -  AFRICAN MANATEES CAPTURED IN GUINEA-BISSAU FOR

                                     PUBLIC DISPLAY IN JAPAN (p. 13)

 

                                  -  MANATEE POACHING CONTINUES IN BELIZE AND

                                     COLOMBIA (pp. 7, 8)

 

                                  -  RECORD MANATEE MORTALITY IN FLORIDA (p. 8)

 

                                  -  MANATEE SANCTUARY CREATED IN MEXICO (p. 16)

 

 

IUCN RESOLUTION ON DUGONGS

 

          Members  of  IUCN attending the World Conservation Congress in  Montreal,  Canada last  October  adopted  the following resolution on Threats to  Dugong.  This  resolution  gives additional  impetus to the preparation of a global action plan for the conservation of  sirenians, which  the  Sirenia  Specialist  Group has been working on now  for  several  years.   -   Amie Bräutigam (SSC Programme Officer)

 

Threats to Dugong

 

AWARE  that  the  dugong (Dugong dugon) is listed as Vulnerable in the  IUCN  Red  List  of Threatened Animals;


NOTING  that  the largest populations of the species in the world are thought to  reside  in  the waters of northern Australia and Papua New Guinea;

 

CONCERNED  that  there  has  been a rapid and catastrophic  decline  in  numbers  along  the Queensland coastline from Cape Bedford to Hervey Bay, a distance of over 1200 km;

 

AWARE  that  researchers have attributed the decline in numbers to drowning  in  commercial fishing and shark protection nets, to traditional hunting and, at the southern end of the area,  to decline in the seagrass beds essential for the species;

 

AWARE that increased tourist resort, marina development and other boating facilities that may increase  the  number  of boats in and along the Great Barrier Reef  and  southern  Queensland coast may threaten the dugong population;

 

ACKNOWLEDGING  that  along  this  coast groups of  indigenous  peoples  have  voluntarily ceased hunting of dugong until the population recovers;

 

ACKNOWLEDGING  ALSO  that  commercial fishers have agreed to  undertake  a  range  of special measures to prevent continuing dugong mortality;

 

NOTING  that  the Australian Government has recently allocated special funds to  undertake  a dugong  recovery  plan  consisting  of a programme of  management,  education  and  research designed to prevent further decline in dugong numbers;

 

The  World  Conservation  Congress  at its 1st Session in  Montreal,  Canada,  14-23  October 1996:

 

1.  CALLS UPON all States with dugong populations to undertake urgent measures  to  ensure that all steps are taken to prevent further decline of the species in their country;

 

2.   CALLS UPON the Chair of the Species Survival Commission to request the  Sirenia  Specialist  Group  to  complete and promote the implementation of the Sirenia  Action  Plan,  with special reference to the status of the dugong;

 

3.  CALLS  UPON  the  Director General to write to all governments  of  States  with  dugong populations, including the Australian Government, expressing concern and:

   

          a)  urging that an ongoing programme of funding be provided for full  implementation of Operative Paragraph 1;

           

          b) urging that coastal tourist resorts and marina developments be restricted to  locations  that  do not threaten the dugong populations along the Great Barrier  Reef  and  southern Queensland coastline.

     

          Note:  The  use of the term "indigenous peoples" in this Recommendation shall  not  be construed  as  having any  implications as regards the rights which may attach to  that  term  in international law.

 

 

 

WHY DO LOCAL PEOPLE CALL THE DUGONG "SEA PIG" AND NOT "SEA COW"?

 

          In  1991  Dr.  Paul  K. Anderson proposed a revision of  sirenian  popular  names  and suggested  introducing  the name "sea pig" instead of "sea cow" for the dugong  [see  Sirenews No.  16].  He  also referred to the fact that in Sri Lanka the dugong is  called  "cudalpandi"  in Sinhalese  and  "kadalpani"  in  Tamil, both of which translate as "sea  pig".  During  my  five years'  fieldwork on dugongs in Indonesia I also came across the names "babi laout" in  Malay and  "sakoko ka koat" in the local language of the Siberut islanders, both of which  mean  "sea pig".  In  the Indonesian Dictionary Purwadanuda the dugong is called "babi  duyung",  which means  "piggy dugong". Local fishermen in Thailand similarly use a word which  translates  as "sea  pig". After Anderson's article, however, the discussion of this subject did  not  continue, and  I found among members of the Sirenia Specialist Group little enthusiasm for debating  the vernacular-name issue.

          I  do  think  that this issue deserves more attention than it has received so  far,  since  it touches  upon  the  heart  of the feeding ecology of the dugong and  its  niche  in  the  seagrass ecosystem.  Even  more important, a change in popular name may have a positive  spinoff  for dugong  conservation, particularly in the regions where "pig meat" is a religious  taboo.  Apart from  this we should pay some respect to the knowledge of local people; there is no  place  for arrogance  here.  It is remarkable that all these local fisherfolk in different countries  and  even different regions within countries all refer to the dugong as "the pig of the sea".

          When  giving a closer look to the feeding ecology of the dugong, their approach  is  not as strange as it seems at first sight:

   · Anderson  already  mentioned that dugongs, like pigs, are "rooters" and not  "grazers"  and are  referred to as rhizome specialists, which is also confirmed by my research  findings in the Moluccas (De Iongh, 1996). The way they remove the substrate is more  similar to the rooting behavior of pigs than the grazing behavior of cows and other grazers.

   · Anderson   mentions   that   dugongs  are,  like  pigs,  omnivorous;   they   both   feed   on macroinvertebrates.  Dugongs are known (like pigs) to dig circular craters in search  of burrowing mussels.

   · I would like to add that dugongs, like pigs, are able to digest feed with a high fiber content. Murray (1981) suggests that dugongs are able to use up to 25% of the fiber fraction for energy, while pigs use 35% of the fiber fraction for energy (Van Wieren, 1996).

          I  think, therefore, that there are some very strong arguments for adopting  the  popular name  "sea  pig"  for  the dugong, with regard to both its  feeding  ecology  and  the  expected positive  conservation  impact  of  such a name change. I would like  to  appeal  to  readers  of Sirenews  to  write  me at the address below if they agree or disagree and  if  they  have  found local  names  in their region (any local name is welcome, be it "pig" or "cow"). 

 

References

 

De  Iongh,  H.H.  1996.  Plant-herbivore  interactions between seagrasses  and  dugongs  in  a tropical  small  island  ecosystem. Ph.D. thesis,  Catholic  University,  Nijmegen,  The Netherlands: 205 pp.

Murray,  R.M.  1981. The importance of VFA in dugong nutrition. In: H.  Marsh  (ed.).  The dugong.  Proceedings  of  a  seminar/workshop  ... 8-13 May  1979.  Ed.  2.  Dept.  of Zoology, James Cook Univ. N. Qld.: 94-95.

Van  Wieren,  S.E.  1996. Digestive strategies in ruminants and nonruminants.  Ph.D.  thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands: 191 pp.

 

 -  Hans De Iongh (Roghorst 343, 6708 KX Wageningen, Holland; fax/tel. 31-317-424599)

 

 

SAFETY RULES FOR MANATEE AERIAL SURVEYS

 

          In  Sirenews No. 24 (October 1995) we published a set of safety  recommendations  for personnel  conducting  aerial  surveys.  The following Spanish  translation  of  these  has  been furnished by the Sirenia Project, Gainesville, Florida.

 

 

 

Reglas de Seguridad para Censos Aereos de Manaties

 

          Los censos aéreos de manatíes presentan un peligro especial para los biólogos  haciendo el  censo  debido a los aeroplanos pequeños que se usan normalmente  (se  pueden  sobrecargar fácilmente), el novel de vuelo relativamente bajo (generalmente 500 pies), los virajes  cerrados que se hacen frecuentemente para contar manatís (puede ocasionar stalling) y las rutas de vuelo sobre agua. A veces la dedicacióde los biólogos puede tornarse en un peligro si la  determinación  para terminar una misión interviene con su juicio referente a las condiciones del  tiempo, la  capacidad  de  su piloto y las condiciones del aeroplano. A continuación  se  enumeran  una serie de reglas de sentido común para el personal envuelto en censos aéreos de manatíes.  Estas no pretenden abarcarlo todo sino destacar algunos aspectos de las regulaciones provistas por  la Oficina  de  Servicios  de  Aeroplanos  (OAS por sus siglas en  inglés),  las  cuales  deben  ser acatadas  por todos los empleados del Departamento de Interior (DOI por sus siglas  en  inglés) en los Estados Unidos cuando participan en un trabajo relacionado a la aviación.

          Se  le agradece a la Sra. Burma Campbell del Servicio de Pezca y Vida Silvestre de  los E.U. por proveer la información utilizada para desarrollar estas reglas, por revisarlas y por  su interés y apollo constante.

 

 ·  El  aeroplano Cessna 172 no tiene suficiente poder para un vuelo de bajo  nivel  (menos de  500  pies). Durante misiones de bajo nivel el aeroplano no puede  funcionar  legítimamente  con una carga certificada mayor (aeroplano, pasajeros,  combustible,  cargamento)  a  la recomendada por el fabricante. Si se planifica llevar más de  dos  observadores se recomienda un Cessna 182, 185 6 206.

 

 ·  Los  censos  nunca  deben hacerse a una altitud menor de  500  pies.  Muchos  biólogos prefieren  una altitud de 750 pies para dar vueltas y contar manatíes en grupos. Bajo  la política  de  aviación del DOI la tripulación del aeroplano no debe volar bajo  500  pies sin un entrenamiento especial y equipo protector personal.

 

 ·  Debe conocer la capacidad de su piloto. ¿Cuántas horas de vuelo tiene de experiencia el piloto,  con el aeroplano en el que se estará como pasajero? Las regulaciones  del  OAS piden 1000 horas de tiempo de vuelo para certificar a un piloto.

 

 ·  Debe  conocer  el registro de servicio de su aeroplano. La política de  aviació  del  DOI exige que un aeroplano reciba servicio e inspección cada 100 horas de tiempo de vuelo.

 

 · Prepare  una  lista de lo que Va/No va y revísela antes de cada vuelo.  Recuerde  que  a pesar  de  que  el piloto tiene la última palabra en la desición de  cancelar  el  vuelo.  Si usted  tiene alguna duda a cerca del tiempo, el piloto o el aeroplano, cancele  el  vuelo. Usted es mucho más importante que un censo que se pierda! Además, todos los  censos se  deben  hacer bajo condiciones óptimas de tiempo para poder  comparar  con  censos hechos  en  otras  fechas;  tiempo dudoso equivale a  resultados  de  censo  dudosos.  Si ocurren  cambios en el tiempo, el piloto o la condición física o mental  del  observador, el  observador debe cancelar la misión y dedir al piloto que regrese a la base o  a  tierra en el lugar más propicio, dependiendo de cuán drástico ha sido el cambio en las condiciones del vuelo.

 

 ·  Prepare  un  plan  de vuelo y déselo al personal entierra que está  en  el  aeropuerto  de donde  su  vuelo  despega y termina. La(s) persona(s) a quien usted le dé  el  plan  será respnsable  de seguir la trayectoria del vuelo y establecerá los procedimientos  de  búsqueda  y  rescate en caso de que su aeroplano no llegue a su destino luego de  una  hora del tiempo estimado de llegada.

 

 · Sólo  el  cargamento  y los pasajeros que sean esenciales para la misión deben  ir  en  el aeroplano.  Esto  no sólo elimina la posibilidad de que se accidente algo  que  no  debía estar  a bordo, sino que también mantiene el peso del aeroplano en el mínimo y  por  lo tanto  usa menos combustible y reduce los costos. Los biólogos deben tener cuidado  en aseguarar  los  utensilios que se utilizan a menudo como: lápices, bolígrafos,  lentes  de cámara, cubiertas de lentes, royos de película, grabadoras, etc.

 

 ·  La  política de DOI exige que el piloto esté presente para supervisar el tipo, contidad  y calidad del combustible utilizado en el aeroplano cuando se está repostando  combustible.  En EU han ocurrido desastres aéreos debido a reabastecimiento erróneo  en  donde combustible para jet se le ha puesto accidentalmente a un aeroplano de motor alterno.

 

 ·  Si  un aeroplano unimotor se va a utilizar a una distancia de la orilla más allá de la  que se puede recorrer planeando sin necesidad del motor, el aeroplano debe tener equipo de flotación y todas las personas a bordo deben tener su propio equipo de flotación.

 

 ·  Los  biólogos que tienen misiones de vuelo regulares podrían beneficiarse de  un  curso de familiarización de vuelo que consiste de 4 horas de teoría y 4 horas de entranamiento aéreo (el conso es aproximadamente $500.00). El mismo pretende darle a los  pasajeros  un conocimiento limitado de como manejar los controles, radios, etc...del  aeroplano y de como aterrizar el aeroplano en caso de una emergencia en donde el piloto se encuentre incapacitado.

 

          Comentarios sobre éstas regulaciones son bienvenidos. Si desea ayudar en traducirlas  a algún  otro idioma puede comunicarse conmigo. Si desea ejemplos de una lista Va/No va o  de un plan de vuelo o información sobre de familiarización de vuelo por favor comuníquese  con: Dr.   Lynn  Lefebvre,  Sirenia  Project,  U.S.  Geological  Survey  -   Biological   Resources Division,  412  NE  16th Avenue, Room 250, Gainesville, FL  32601   USA;  teléfono:  (352) 372-2571; fax: (352) 374-8080; Internet: sirenia@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu

 

 

ZOO CONGRESS

 

     The VII Congreso de la Asociacion Latinoamericana de Zoologicos y Acuarios will be held in  the  city  of Puebla, Mexico, 16-21 April 1997. The theme of the  congress  is  "La  Nueva Gestion  de  los Zoologicos para la Conservacion" (New Conservation Efforts  by  Zoos).  For information,  contact Fernando Pacheco M., 11 Oriente 2407, Col. Azcarate, Puebla,  Puebla, CP   72007   Mexico   (tel.   52-22-358713,  358718,   358700,   fax   52-22-358607,   e-mail cbsgmex@noc.pue.udlap.mx)

 

 

ANIMAL NUTRITION CONFERENCE

 

          A  joint  meeting of The Nutrition Society, The Royal Zoological Society  of  Scotland, and  the  British  Federation of Zoos will be held on 16-18 May 1997 at  the  Edinburgh  Zoo, Scotland.  The theme is "Nutrition of Wild and Captive Wild Animals." For  further  information,   contact  Mr.  Rodney  Warwick,  The  Nutrition  Society,  10  Cambridge  Court,   210 Shepherds  Bush  Road, London W6 7NJ, U.K.; tel.: +44 171 602 0228; fax:  +44  171  602 1756; e-mail: 100672.2151@compuserve.com

 

 

COURSE IN ZOO ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND WELFARE

 

     The  International  Summer School in Zoo Animal Behaviour & Welfare will  be  held  this year  on  7-18  July 1997 at the Edinburgh Zoo, Scotland. This is a 10-day  course  in  current scientific  theory  and its application to husbandry, management, and welfare of  zoo  animals. For  further  information,  contact  Hamish Macandrew,  UnivEd  Technologies  Ltd,  UnivEd Training  & Conference Centre, 11 South College Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AA, Scotland,  UK (fax +44(0) 131 650 9019, e-mail Hamish.Macandrew@ed.ac.uk)

 

 

MANATEE MANAGEMENT PLAN AVAILABLE

 

          Copies of UNEP's Regional Management Plan for the West Indian Manatee (Caribbean Environment  Programme  Technical  Report No. 35) are still available from  UNEP  at  14-20 Port  Royal  Street,  Kingston, Jamaica (tel.: 809-922-9267 to 9;  fax:  809-922-9292;  e-mail: uneprcuja@toj.com).  The report is available in English, French, and Spanish;  please  specify which language(s) you want.

 

 

MANATEE POPULATION BIOLOGY PUBLICATION AVAILABLE

 

     The landmark multiauthored volume entitled "Population Biology of the Florida  Manatee"  (T.J. O'Shea, B.B. Ackerman, and H.F. Percival, eds.,  National Biological Service  Information  and  Technology Report 1, 289 pp., 1995) is still available at no cost.  For  copies  write:  Sirenia  Project,  U.S.  Geological Survey, Florida Caribbean Science  Center,  412  NE  16th Ave.-Rm.   250,  Gainesville,  FL  32601  (e-mail:  sirenia@nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu)   OR    Tom O'Shea,  U.S.  Geological Survey, Midcontinent Ecological Science  Center,  4512  McMurry Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80525-3400 (e-mail: Tom_O'Shea@nbs.gov).

 

 

READ SIRENEWS ON THE INTERNET

 

     Dan  Odell  has  kindly  posted  the text of Sirenews No.  26  on  the  Society  for  Marine Mammalogy's  web  site,  and  will do so with the present and future  issues  as  well.  Go  to <http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~smm/>;  the  Sirenews  link  is near the  bottom  of  the  first page.

     These  posted  versions of the newsletter will not include the illustrative  material  or  most abstracts that appear in the hard-copy editions, since these items are printed from camera-ready copy  rather  than digitized. If you nonetheless find that the Internet versions are  adequate  for your  needs  and you no longer wish to receive the hard copies, please notify me so that  I  can delete you from the mailing list and save on printing and postage.  -  DPD

 

 

LOCAL NEWS

 

AUSTRALIA

 

          "Emergency" Measures to Increase Dugong  Protection in the Southern  Great Barrier Reef? - Readers of Sirenews will  be aware   of   the  serious  decline   in   dugong numbers  along a 2000-km stretch of the  east coast  of  Queensland. Aerial surveys  of  the more urbanized and intensively fished  southern  Great Barrier Reef indicate  that  dugong numbers declined by more than 50% between 1986/87   and  1994.  Dugong   numbers   in Hervey  Bay-Great Sandy Strait  immediately south  of  the Great Barrier Reef  region  also declined  by more than 50% after the loss  of >1000 km² of seagrass habitat in 1992.

          Last   November,  the  Great   Barrier Reef   Ministerial   Council   considered   the issue.   This  council is composed of  the  national and Queensland (state) ministers of  the Environment,  Primary Industries, and  Tourism.   The  Council  confirmed   that   urgent action  is  required to ensure the  recovery  of the  dugong  population in the  Great  Barrier Reef  and  adjacent waters and agreed  that  a chain  of interim "Dugong Protection  Areas" should  be established along this coast in  key dugong   habitats  at  approximately   200-km intervals. They also endorsed other  measures for  dugong  recovery and  conservation,  including  measures to reduce the likelihood  of dugongs drowning in commercial fishing nets or being injured by underwater explosives.

          Little  has changed. Mesh netting  has so  far been banned in only one area,  Shoalwater  Bay.  This bay is  the  most  important dugong  habitat along this coast. It  has  been protected from many anthropogenic  activities by  its  status  as  a  Military  Training  Area; however, the use of underwater explosives  is still  permitted  at one site in  this  bay.  Last month, the large-scale US-Australian military exercise   Tandem  Thrust  was  held  in   the vicinity of this bay.

          The  effectiveness  of  these  "Dugong Protection Areas" will depend on the political will to exclude mesh netting, control  boating activity,  reduce inputs from agriculture,  and control coastal development, and the  support of   Indigenous   groups   to   maintain   their moratoria  on  traditional hunting in  this  region.  So  far, the  Indigenous  peoples  have been by far the most cooperative  stakeholder group.   Given  that  their   association   with dugongs  goes back thousands of  years,  they understandably  consider they have  the  most to  lose  by the extinction  of  dugongs  along this coast.  -  Helene Marsh

 

BELIZE

 

     Manatee  Poaching  Continues  in  Belize.  - We at the Belize Center for  Environmental  Studies (BCES) are in the process  of writing  a management plan for the  proposed Port  Honduras Marine Protected  Area.   To become   more  familiar  with  this  area,   in particular   the   banks  between   the   Snake Cayes, I visited the area in October 1996.

      I  set  out by boat for the banks  off  East Snake  Caye with Larry Sauliner,  our  Peace Corps Environmental Educator, and his wife, a   Rural  Development  Officer  and  also   a Peace   Corps   volunteer.   After   about   40 minutes'  travel  north along  the  coast  from Punta  Gorda Town, we arrived in  the  Deep River area. I then said that if we saw vultures we should investigate what they were  eating, because  there was a rumor around town  that the   Guatemalans   were  over   here   killing manatees. By the time I finished saying  this, Ms. Sauliner pointed out some vultures.

     We  approached  the shoreline  where  the vultures  were. Entering the  mangroves,  we found  the  remains  of  five  recently-slaughtered  manatees.  The  skulls  were   cracked, apparently  with  a  hammer  or  other  metal tool. The persons responsible had cared  only for the prime parts; there was lots of decayed meat  on  the  bones, and the  fins  and  skins were  all  there. Some of the  skulls  were  of adult size and some were juveniles.

     Continuing  our  journey,  less  than  five minutes  away  we saw  more  vultures.  This time   there  were  four   freshly   slaughtered manatees.  Again,  the prime meat  had  been stripped off and the other meat left to rot.

     I  have  no  proof of  the  rumor  that  the meat from these manatees is going to Guatemala.  However,  I  am  in  the  field  almost every  day  and have never seen or  heard  of manatee  meat  for sale in Belize; but  I  have had  people  confirm  to  me  that  they  have bought the meat in Guatemala.

     Ten  minutes from the butchering site  are some  offshore cayes where fishermen  camp. These fishermen are mostly Guatemalans who have   valid  Belizean  fishing  licenses.   The fishermen  at these cayes have no  regard  for Belizean laws or the environment. I have  not seen  them  killing manatees but I  have  seen them  setting  their gillnets at  the  mouths  of rivers  and  on  some of our  reefs,  which  is illegal in Belize.

     As   a  concerned  Belizean   citizen   and BCES employee, I have informed the  appropriate government ministries, and am  calling on  them, on community groups, and  on  the NGO  community to come together  and  discuss  ways  to  resolve  this  problem.  I  also believe it is important to call upon our neighbors  from Guatemala and ask them  to  assist us in dealing with this urgent situation.

     About  a  year ago  BCES  facilitated  the visits  of  two scientists from the  USA,  who found  approximately 11 butchering sites  and an  estimated 35 manatee kills  [see  Sirenews No.  24]. The result was a press release;  but to  date nothing has been done except lots  of promises   from   some  donors  and   a   few pamphlets  received from the  Florida  Power and Light Company. Meanwhile,  discussions have   begun  with  the  Punta  Gorda   Town Police Department and the Fisheries Department.  In  the near future we will  meet  with the Toledo Community College  Environmental Club, local fishermen, Toledo Tour Guide Association,  and other organizations  to  discuss the possibility of volunteer patrols in the area.

     At this time BCES has no money for  this kind  of activity. However, BCES has  volunteered   to  lend  its  boat  for  patrolling   the waters. Before the patrols can take place,  we need  money for fuel, hand radios to call  for support   or  help  in  case   of   emergencies, binoculars,   spotlights,   batteries,   camping equipment  (including  tents,  hammocks,   or sleeping   cots,  portable  stoves,  etc.),   and some rain gear. We believe that much of  the poaching takes place on rainy nights.  -   Wil Maheia  (Field Specialist, BCES, P. O.  Box 150, corner of Front Street & Wahima Alley, Punta Gorda, Belize; e-mail: pgwil@btl.net)

 

COLOMBIA

 

     Manatee     Poaching     Deplored     in Colombia.  -  Hans de Iongh sent  an  article from  the  Bogotá  newspaper  El  Tiempo  (9 Feb.   1997)  that  describes  an  instance   of manatee   poaching  and   discusses   manatee status in the province of Santander.  Excerpts follow:

     "ANOTHER   CRIME  AGAINST   THE MANATEE.  A group of  fishermen  clubbed to  death  four of six manatees  remaining  in the El Llanito marsh, in Santander.... Sixteen fishermen   corraled  and  killed   [the]   four manatees, including a cow and calf, to obtain two tons of meat, in what many regard as the worst  ecological  tragedy of recent  times  in this part of the country.

     "According to the director of the  Colombian  Institute  of Fisheries  and  Aquaculture (INPA)   in  Barrancabermeja,  Pedro   Julián Contreras,  there  were only six  manatees  in the marsh.

     "The  manatee was once abundant  in  the rivers, marshes, and mangroves of the  warm parts   of  the  country,  principally   on   the Caribbean  coast  and the  lower  and  middle Magdalena River. In the latter region,  which supposedly had the largest natural  concentration of manatees in Colombia, there are today only  35.  There are also some  in  Magangué (Bolivar).

     "These  animals  are  hunted  mainly   for their  meat, whose taste can be  mistaken  for that  of  bacon,  turkey,  cattle,  chicken,   or bagre  [a  freshwater fish], according  to  the part it comes from....

     "According  to  witnesses,  the  fishermen ensnared the manatees with nets, which  took them  almost  half  a  day.  Then  they  killed them  and held a manatee roast in the  village that  was attended by more than  100  people, including  the  police inspector of  the  town, who  is being investigated by the  authorities. The leftover meat was sold to fishmongers.

     "Paradoxically,   in  the  opinion  of   the experts,  the manatee is the  fishermen's  best friend, since it helps preserve the fauna of the places  where it lives, including the  fish.  Its ecological and economic importance is directly   proportional  to  its  gluttony....   If   the manatees  are exterminated, [floating  plants] grow  to excess, impede the passage of  light, and  kill  off microscopic algae  that  produce oxygen.  This ... reduces fishery  production, which  harms  the very  fisherman  who  contributes to the manatee's demise.

     "Public  prosecutors and  local  environmental  officials have begun an  investigation of  the poachers. The head of the  Magdalena Valley    Fishermen's    Association,    Pablo Emilio Tejada, pointed out that the killing  of these  animals serves to discredit  the  fishing community,  which has benefited  from  programs  to  restock  fish in  the  marshes.  The Regional  Autonomous  Corporation  of  Santander  (CAS)  asked the  El  Llanito  law-enforcement  community to economically  sanction  the  criminals  and  cancel  their  fishing licenses,  [or even impose] a  penal  sanction, which  could vary from fines to 1-5  years  in prison, under the laws in force.

     "While  the few surviving manatees in  El Llanito are being slaughtered, the  inhabitants of  ... Sabana de Torres and Puerto  Wilches, in Santander, offer protection and food to  20 manatees that live in the Paredes marsh...."

 

FLORIDA

 

     Disastrous Year for Florida Manatees. -  1996  was  the  worst  year  on  record  for manatee  mortality  in Florida,  even  without the spring die-off on the west coast due to red tide.  The  total  number  of  dead   manatees recovered was 415 (nearly twice the previous record),  of which 151 were attributed to  the red  tide  outbreak.  The  remaining  264  exceeded  the previous single-year (1990)  mortality  of 214 by almost 25%; the  total  1995 mortality  was  201.  The  264  non-red   tide deaths  broke  down  by  cause  of  death   as follows:   watercraft,  60;  flood   gates/canal locks, 10; perinatal, 55; cold stress, 17; other natural,  28; undetermined, 82;  verified  but unrecovered  carcasses,  12.  The  60  watercraft-related  deaths  also  beat  the   previous record of 53, set in 1991.

     A  February  aerial  survey  of  the   state counted 2,639 manatees, the highest  number recorded  to  date. Of these,  1,182  were  on Florida's  west coast; by the end of  the  year 283 (24%) of these had been confirmed dead.  -  (Source: Florida Department of  Environmental Protection)

 

     Progress in Reintroduction of  Captive Manatees,   April  1996-March   1997.   - Merritt  Island National  Wildlife  Refuge Staging Area: The manatee acclimation pens in  the upper Banana River were not  used  in 1996  because the submerged aquatic  vegetation  (SAV; seagrass and  algae)  disappeared from  the pens during fall and  winter,  1995-1996.   The loss of vegetation was  definitely not  caused  by  the few  manatees  that  were held in the pens during the summers of  1994 and  1995; the unused "control" pen also  lost all vegetative cover.  The dominant seagrasses  in  the  Banana River  for  at  least  10-15 years   prior  to  1995  have  been   Halodule wrightii  (shoal grass) and  Syringodium  filiforme (manatee grass).  A long-term  decline in  salinity,  from  about  28  ppt  in  summer 1994, to 18 ppt in summer 1995, to 10 ppt in summer 1996, apparently killed the Syringodium  in  the  upper Banana  River,  as  recent vegetation  surveys  indicate  it  is   relatively scarce  in  areas it once  dominated  (J.  Provancha,   Dynamac  Corp.,   pers.   comm.), including in the acclimation pens. 

     Sirenia   Project   and   Dynamac    Corp. personnel  mapped SAV species  composition and estimated SAV density in the acclimation pens  and  in a nearby  reference  plot  during the  summers  of 1994-1996.   This  research documented  the disappearance of  Syringodium  and most of the Halodule wrightii  (shoal grass)  both  inside and outside  the  pens.   It also documented the replacement of the latter species  by Ruppia maritima (widgeon  grass) outside   the   pens  during  the   spring   and summer of 1996. 

     The  inability of Ruppia to establish  itself inside the pens may be indicative of how  this species spreads its seeds: by direct deposit  in an   established  bed;  by  wildlife  that   eats Ruppia, such as manatees, coots, and  ducks, which cannot or do not use the pens; and  via drifting  plants  with  seeds  attached,   which would  also  tend  to  be  excluded  from  the pens.  Seeds that do make it into a pen (some were  deliberately introduced by  researchers) may not produce viable offspring in the  fine, unconsolidated    sediment   layer   that    has accumulated   in  the  absence  of   stabilizing seagrass  rhizomes.  Most of the pen  fencing was  removed  in early January  1997  to  encourage  the  regrowth of  seagrasses.   When vegetation   again  becomes  established,   the U.S.  Fish  & Wildlife Service plans  to  continue use of the acclimation pens as a  temporary  staging site for captive-reared  manatees prior  to their reintroduction to estuarine  and marine environments.

     Direct  Release of Doc and  Dakota  in Biscayne  Bay: On 20 August 1996,  "Doc," a   captive-born   male   manatee   reared   at Homosassa     Springs    State    Park,     and "Dakota,"  an  orphaned male  reared  at  Sea World,  were  released at  the  Cutler  Power Plant  in  Deering  Bay, on the  west  side  of Biscayne  Bay, Dade County, Florida.   Both manatees  were fitted at the release  site  with satellite-monitored  transmitter assemblies  by Bob  Bonde,  Sirenia Project.   These  4-year old  males  are  sexually  mature,  and   were prepared  for their release through staging  at the  Merritt Island National  Wildlife  Refuge staging area last summer.  Following recommendations  made at the March 1996  Interagency/Oceanaria meeting, Sea World personnel added seagrasses to the diet of these long-term  captives  from  April 1996  up  to  their release in August.  After his release,  Dakota began almost immediately to explore his  new surroundings,  leaving behind Doc, who  was reluctant   to  leave  shallow   water.    These different  responses to release  mirrored  Doc and Dakota's behavior in the staging area last summer:  Dakota more quickly "took" to  his new  environment,  which Doc  initially  preferred  the shallow end of the pen,  and  took longer to feed on natural vegetation.   Dakota made  his  first  exploratory  venture  out   of Deering  Bay 2 days after his  release,  while Doc  stayed in Deering Bay for over  a  week after his release.

     Heather  Smith, a Sirenia  Project  volunteer  who  helped with observations  of  manatees  at  the staging area  in  July-September 1995,  and Kevin Mayo, a biologist with  the Dade  County Department  of  Environmental Resources  Management,  have  radio-tracked and observed Doc and Dakota as they adjusted to their new environment.       

     Post-release  Assessments: Dakota  was recaptured  along  with  another  adult   male manatee  on  29 October 1996  (2  months,  9 days after release),  at Convoy Point in South Biscayne Bay.  Sea World personnel, directed by  Bob Wagoner, captured the  manatees  in shallow  water  using  their  24-ft  net   boat.   Drs.  Mark Lowe (Homosassa  Springs  State Park),  Sam  Dover (Sea  World),  and  Mike Renner  (Miami Seaquarium) assessed  Dakota's overall physical condition and took blood samples for further analysis.  Bob Bonde took blubber   thickness  measurements  using   an ultrasonic   scanner.   Umbilical,   anal,   and peduncle  blubber  layers  were  reduced   by 40%,  27%,  and  5%,  respectively.   While these  values  seem high,  the  actual  blubber values  were  at or above the  average  values for an independent male manatee.  Long-term captive  manatees typically have  much  more fat  than  wild  ones,  and  dramatic  fat   and weight  loss  following release are to  be  expected.    Dakota's   abdomen   was    round, showing  no  sign of longitudinal  folds,  and feces  passed  looked  normal.   Some  serous atrophy   was   indicated   externally   in   his shoulder  region.   Dakota  was  released   on site.    Results   of  Dakota's   blood   sample analysis   indicated  elevated  creatinine   and BUN values.  However, veterinarians consider these values acceptable due to expected fat layer reduction. 

     Doc  was  net-captured on  21  November 1996   (3  months  after  release),   in   Coral Gables  Waterway off Biscayne Bay,  Miami.  Drs.  Mark Lowe and Mike Renner  assessed his general condition, and determined that  he appeared  to  be  in  even  better  shape   than Dakota,  with  little  external  sign  of  serous atrophy.   Reductions  in  his  dorsal  blubber layer were 54% (umbilical), 31% (anal),  and 35% (peduncle), and actual values were at or above   average  values  for  an   independent male  manatee.   He  was  released  on   site.  Doc's blood creatinine level was normal  (2.3 mg/dl),  and other routinely  evaluated  blood parameters   were  generally  within   normal ranges.   Doc's  total  cholesterol  level   was high  relative to other manatees (403  mg/dl), which   is  consistent  with  his  values   from 1995.

     Sea  World  of Florida personnel,  led  by Bob Wagoner, recaptured Dakota and Doc on 24 and 25 March 1997, respectively.  Dakota was  captured  just  south of  Black  Point  in Biscayne Bay, and Doc was caught in  Indian Camp   Creek,  Everglades   National   Park.  Everglades  National  Park (ENP)  and  Dade County  personnel  assisted  in  the  captures.  Sirenia   Project  personnel  made   ultrasonic measurements   of  blubber   thickness,   took girth  measurements  and fecal  samples,  and fitted   both   manatees  with   new   satellite-monitored   transmitter   assemblies.    While both  manatees  have  continued  to  lose  fat, both  have umbilical fat and  girth  measurements  at  least as great as their  last  assessment, both are clearly feeding, and both were determined to be in good overall condition by Sea  World  veterinarian Sam  Dover.   They were  released on site less than an  hour  after capture.  Another reassessment will  probably not  be  necessary for another 6  months,  the conservative life of the transmitter batteries.

     Highlights    of   Field    Observations: While   Dakota  fell  in  quickly  with   other manatees   that  appear  to   travel   routinely among  various  freshwater  sources  on  Biscayne Bay between Homestead Bayfront Park and  Coral  Gables  Waterway,  Doc  initially had  a  much smaller range in  northern  Biscayne  Bay and typically was observed  to  be alone.   Doc  moved from  the  Coral  Gables Waterway,  on  the  southeast  coast,  to   the southwest coast of Florida between the end of November  and mid-December 1996.   On  3 December, he was observed in two canals  in the Homestead area of Biscayne Bay; on  one of  these occasions, he appeared to be  traveling  with another manatee.  On  6  December he  was  seen  in a canal at the  south  end  of Manatee Bay, and by 13 December, his satellite-determined location was just off of  Cape Sable.  He then moved north to Indian  Camp Creek, where he has been since  mid-December.   This  almost-freshwater  creek  extends far inland, and contains abundant  submerged vegetation,    predominantly    water    celery (Vallisneria  sp.).   On the  8  occasions  Doc has  been closely observed between 15  January  and 25 March, he has been  by  himself.  Skip Snow, an ENP ecologist, noted that  his aerial  surveys  have shown  manatees  to  be common  in this region of the Park,  although the   surveys  do  not  include  Indian   Camp Creek.  Skip plans to do some aerial tracking to  determine if other manatees are using  the creek. 

     Both   of  these  captive-reared   manatees have  succeeded  in finding  suitable  manatee habitat  in  very  different  locations.    Kevin Mayo, Dade County Environmental Resources  Management, and Skip Snow,  ENP,  will assist  the Sirenia Project in making  periodic checks   on  Doc's  and  Dakota's   progress.  Heather   Smith's  excellent   assistance   was greatly  appreciated; she completed  her  tour of duty with the Sirenia Project on 28  March and  returned  to  Canada.   She  is  currently seeking   research   experience   opportunities with other marine mammals.

     Florida   Marine   Research    Institute Highlights:  Leslie  Ward and  Beth  Wright report that systematic recaptures of two long-term  captive manatees, Graham  and  Valentine,  provided an opportunity to monitor  the success of manatee reintroduction into natural habitat.   Graham,  a  5-yr-old  female,   and Valentine,  a  4-yr-old  male,  were  released without  staging into Whitewater Bay,  Everglades  National  Park,  in  September  1995. Evaluation  techniques  included  documentation  of  travel  patterns  and  habitat  use  via telemetry,  monitoring of  blood  parameters, and  morphometric  measurements   including girths  and the non-invasive  measurement  of blubber  thickness using ultrasound.  After  a year and a half of monitoring,  reintroduction seems  to  be successful  based  upon  habitat use,  observed  association  with  other  manatees,  and  gross body  appearance.  Blubber thickness   measured  at   three   standardized body   sites   decreased  at   each   successive evaluation;  however, the decrease  in  values was expected because captive manatees  typically  have thicker blubber than  free-ranging ones. Graham has primarily stayed in Whitewater  Bay, while Valentine has made  extensive   moves  along  the  southwest  coast   to Everglades  City,  periodically  returning   to Whitewater Bay. Graham and Valentine  will continue to be monitored until  morphometric measurements stabilize.

     Recommendations:    1)   Other    direct releases  of  captive-born  and  captive-reared manatees in South Florida should be  considered.

     2) The cost of constructing and  managing a  soft-release  program should  be  compared with the cost of direct releases with follow-up monitoring.

     3)  A  cooperative  agreement  should  be developed among the cooperating agencies  to better   coordinate  release   decisions,   post-release monitoring activities, and responsibilities for collecting, analyzing, and publishing data   related  to  the  captive   reintroduction program.   -   Lynn Lefebvre  (Sirenia  Project, Florida Caribbean Science Center,  U.S. Geological   Survey  -  Biological   Resources Division, Gainesville, FL 32601)

 

     It's  Great  to  Have Friends!  -  In  the October  1995 issue of Sirenews,  a  dramatic headline     announced     "U.S.     SIRENIA PROJECT   THREATENED   WITH    EXTINCTION."    At  the  time,  the   situation seemed that dire, as our budget had been  cut 24%,  and  the agency to  which  the  Project belonged  (the  National  Biological  Service) really  was becoming extinct.  I am happy  to report  that  not only did the  Sirenia  Project survive, but things are truly looking up  since our transfer to the U.S. Geological Survey in October  1996.   As of 1  October,  the  NBS was  replaced  by  the  Biological   Resources Division  (BRD),  one of  four  USGS  Divisions.  The Project also became part of a new center, the Florida Caribbean Science Center, headquartered  in Gainesville,  Florida.   Dr. Russ  Hall  became the Center's  Director  in January  1997.  Dr. Denny Fenn  is  Director of the USGS-BRD, and Dr. Sue Haseltine  is Director of the Southeast Region of the BRD. The USGS has a long history of collaborative research  with other federal, state,  and  local partners.   I strongly believe that the  mission of the Sirenia Project, to provide information vital  to  the long-term recovery of  the  West Indian  manatee, requires  such  collaborative efforts.

     All  of  us at the Sirenia  Project  are  extremely  grateful to the many  colleagues  and partners  who helped us through  a  traumatic year.   We  deeply appreciated the  letters  of support that came in from around the  world.  Special  thanks  go to the  Save  the  Manatee Club   and  an  anonymous  donor  for   their generous  and timely donations.  Thank  you!  -  Lynn Lefebvre

     [EDITOR'S NOTE: A long-term  radio-tracking   study   of   the   Sirenia    Project's movements  through  the bureaucracy  of  the U.S.  Department  of the Interior  has  so  far traced  it from the Fish and  Wildlife  Service through  the National Biological  Survey  and National Biological Service to the  Geological Survey.  However,  individual  satellite   tags attached  to  Lynn  and  her  coworkers  have revealed  the  curious  fact  that  their   home ranges  have remained  unaltered  throughout these  administrative peregrinations; they  can still  be regularly observed in their  same  old offices  in  Gainesville. We are  delighted  to know  that this free-ranging project is still  in good  overall  condition  despite  its  reduced blubber  thickness  and severe  recent  stress, and  we hope that supplemental feedings  will eventually  bring  it  back  up  to  its   proper weight.  Meanwhile,  we  trust  that  its  new habitat  in the Geological Survey will  induce it to finally venture into sirenian  paleontology!]

 

     An Evaluation of Strip-transect  Aerial Survey  Methods for Monitoring  Manatee Populations in Florida. - We evaluated  the use  of replicated strip-transect aerial  surveys to  estimate  manatee population  size  in  the Banana  River, Florida, an  important  warm-season  refuge for manatees.   Our  objectives were (1) to estimate manatee population size; (2) to correct for perception bias by  applying a  Petersen  mark-recapture model  to  counts made  by two independent observers; and  (3) to   evaluate  the  usefulness  of  this   survey method   for   detecting  trends   in   manatee population size over time.

     Fifteen  replicate surveys were  conducted in August-September 1993 and August  1994.  A  total of 531 individuals belonging  to  248 manatee  groups  was  counted,  for  a  mean group  size  of 2.14.  Survey-specific  correction  factors for perception bias  (the  proportion  of  manatees  that is  visible  within  the strip-transect   but  is  missed  by   observers) averaged  1.12.   Compared  with  a  conventional   single-observer   aerial   survey,   the doubled-observer   technique   increased   the number of manatee groups by 22% due to the second observer and by 33% when the double counts were corrected by the Petersen model.

     Corrected   population  estimates  of   the 160-km²  strip-transect  survey  area   ranged from  113  to  240  manatees.   In  estimating mean annual population size, we excluded the final  survey  of  1993  because  it  coincided with the first cold-front of the season.   Mean population size differed between years (1993: 125  manatees;  1994:  179  manatees;  P  < 0.024).    Precision   of   annual    population estimates  was high (CV < 0.05),  indicating that the technique should be useful for  monitoring purposes in the Banana River.   Power analysis  software  for linear  regression  was used  to  demonstrate that with  the  stringent assumptions  of  CV  = 0.05  and  power  = 0.75,  we should be able to detect  an  annual rate  of  change  (r) = 0.05  within  4  years.  This  study represents the first attempt to  use replicated   strip-transect  aerial   surveys   to estimate   manatee   population   size.     The survey  technique  presented here  is  an  improvement   over  past  attempts  to   estimate absolute  manatee abundance, because it  is  a repeatable,  standardized  survey  design  that produces  population  estimates  with  known precision. However, application of the  strip-transect  survey  technique to  other  areas  in Florida   during   summer  may   be   limited because  of  excessive  water  depths,   water turbidity,  and  other  environmental  features typical  of  manatee  habitats.   Despite  these limitations, we recommend that managers use warm-season  transect surveys in the  Banana River  in  conjunction with other  datasets  to determine  if manatee population size  on  the east  coast  of Florida is increasing.   -   Karl E.  Miller  (Florida  Cooperative  Fish   and Wildlife  Research  Unit,  Univ.  of  Florida, Gainesville;  current address:  Dept. of  Wildlife  Ecology  &  Conservation,  P.O.   Box 110430,  Univ.  of Florida,  Gainesville,  FL 32611, USA), Bruce B. Ackerman  (Florida Dept.  of Environmental  Protection,  Florida Marine Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL 33701), Lynn W. Lefebvre (Sirenia Project, U.S.  Geological Survey-Biological Resources  Division,  Gainesville,  FL  32601),  and Kari B. Clifton (Florida Dept. of  Environmental  Protection, Florida Marine  Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL 33701)

 

          Phylogeography of the West Indian Manatee:   How  Many   Populations   and How  Many Taxa? - In order to  resolve  the genetic  population structure and  biogeography  of the West Indian manatee  (Trichechus manatus),  mitochondrial (mt)  DNA  control region sequences were compared among eight locations  across the western Atlantic  region.  Fifteen haplotypes were identified among  87 individuals  from  Florida, Puerto  Rico,  the Dominican   Republic,  Mexico,   Colombia, Venezuela,  Guyana and Brazil.  Despite  the demonstrated  ability  of  manatees  to  move thousands of kms along continental  margins, haplotype   frequency  comparisons   demonstrate   genetic   separations   of   populations between  most locations.  These findings  are consistent with tagging studies which indicate that  stretches  of open water  and  unsuitable coastal habitats constitute substantial  barriers to gene flow and colonization.  Low levels of genetic diversity within Florida and Brazilian samples might be explained by recent colonization   or  bottleneck  effects,   respectively.  Three   distinctive   mtDNA   lineages   were observed   in   T.   manatus,    corresponding approximately  to  Florida  and  the   Greater Antilles,    Mexico   and   Caribbean    South America, and Atlantic South America sample sites.   These  lineages, which  are  not  concordant  with  previous  subspecies   designations,  are separated by  sequence  divergence estimates of p=0.03-0.07, approximately the same  level of divergence  observed  between T.  manatus and the Amazonian manatee  (T. inunguis).   -  Angela I.  Garcia-Rodriguez (Dept. of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, P.O. Box  110600, Univ. of  Florida,  Gainesville, FL  32611), B. W. Bowen,  A.  Mignucci-Giannoni,  M.  Marmontel,  R.  Montoya-Ospina,  B. Morales-Vela, M.  Rudin,  D. P. Domning, and P. M. McGuire

 

GUINEA-BISSAU

 

     Toba  Aquarium Acquires  West  African  Manatees. - In May 1996, two  African manatees   (Trichechus   senegalensis)    were captured   by  local  fishermen  in  the   Geba River  in  Guinea-Bissau,  West  Africa.  We transported   these  animals  to  Japan   under permits  from  both  countries  to  study   the behavior  of this species in captivity  at  Toba Aquarium.

     We have kept dugongs at Toba Aquarium since  1977,  and have endeavored to  do  research  on the captive care of the  dugong  as well  as  its  behavior  in  captivity.  We   are proud  that,  as  a result, a  huge  number  of visitors  have shown considerable interest  in, as well as gained better understanding of, the dugong  and  other endangered  species.  Furthermore,   our   activities   have   not    only brought  about  progress  in  conservation  of dugongs,  but also have proven to  be  educational   for  the  peoples  of  the   Philippines through  our joint project with  that  country. Our  purpose in keeping African manatees  is to   study   their  feeding   and   reproductive behavior in captivity.

     In comparison with other species of sirenians,  the  African  manatee  is  not  yet  well known  among  the  general  public  or   even biologists.  Evidently,  judging from  our  research in Guinea-Bissau, the same can be said for   the  local  peoples  inhabiting  the   area where  the  manatees  occur.  It  is  therefore imperative  for  more people to  get  a  better understanding   of  this  species  in  order   to develop activities for its conservation.

     Our   surveys   of  African   manatees   in Guinea-Bissau lasted respectively for a  week in  December 1994 and from March  to  June 1996.  They  covered  a distance  of  60  km, from the middle reaches of the Geba River to Contuboel   [see  H.-J.   Schuhmann,   1995, Natur und Museum 125(12): 402-409].

     This river meanders along with widths  of 40-100  m. At the time of our surveys in  the dry  season, its depth was about 4 m.  At  the beginning  of  the dry  season  in  December, floating water grass (Trapa natans)  increased significantly and covered the water surface as far  as the middle of the river, but  decreased after  March. However, in the upper  reaches at Contuboel, these floating plants grew well, despite  the dry season and low water  levels. We assumed that the difference in quantity of the  floating  grass  in  these  two  areas  was caused by feeding activities of the manatees.

     Locating   the   manatees  proved   to   be extremely  hard,  due to the muddy  water  as well  as  the  species'  behavior.  The   native fishermen,  however,  are able  to  locate  the manatees  by  day or night.  We  could  often confirm  their  location  when  they  fled   on hearing  our outboard motors. In  our  survey of March 1996, 35 manatees were sighted.

     In   Guinea-Bissau,   meat   of    captured manatees is often sold as food. According  to local sources, there was an instance in February  1996 when seven manatees  were  caught at  the  same time in Bafata.  In  most  cases, though,  the  manatees  are  not   deliberately hunted,  but rather get caught accidentally  in fishing  nets.  During our survey,  four  were caught,  two  at a time. Although  the  native people  usually kill them as soon as  they  are caught,  we  were  fortunate  to  obtain  from fishermen  two  live individuals  which  were caught  near  Geba  on  8  May  1996.  These were a male and a female, both 3 m long.

     We  kept  them  in Bafata  from  8  to  30 May,  and  thereafter  in  the   Guinea-Bissau National  Zoo  from  31 May to  12  June.  A holding  tank  6.6 m in diameter  and  0.9  m deep  was  made from a  tarpaulin  and  filled with   water  from  the  Geba  River.   Water temperature  ranged  from 28.8-33.0  C.  We tried  to feed them 15 kinds of  water  plants, including  Neptunia  oleracea,  Trapa  natans, Ludwigia   decurrans  var.,  and  Pistia   stratiotes.  We observed that they ate  some  species of Gramineae eagerly while at the zoo.

     We transported them to Japan on 12  June 1996  by  a chartered  aircargo  MD-11.  The flight  from Bissau to Nagoya took  about  21 hours;  about  32 hours in  all  were  required including the transport from Nagoya  Airport to   Toba  Aquarium.  During  transport   the manatees  were held in containers with  water and some urethane foam matting for  support. For handling and moving, a power crane  and forklift  were  used. They tended  to  struggle on  the stretcher if the air temperature  in  the plane  compartment rose, so we set the  cabin temperature  to  19  C. It  was  kept  between 18.4 and 21.8 C, with 52-91% humidity. We also  took  steps to keep their  body  temperature from rising by showering them  continuously.  At times they would  pull  themselves up and wag their tails; when they did so,  we had  no choice but to wait until  they  calmed down.  A  few  hours  after  arrival  at  Toba Aquarium,   we  noticed  that   they   eagerly consumed   a   quantity  of   Italian   ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum).

     Two  types of indoor pool, a display  tank with  300 m3 of water volume (12.0 x  6.8  x 3.8  m)  and a holding tank of 70 m3  (6.8  x 4.2  x  2.8 m), were provided  for  the  manatees.  The filtration and  circulation  systems are built into five filter tanks, equiped for  19 turnovers  per 24 hours. Water and  air  temperatures  are  controlled at 25-30  C  respectively.  A skylight in the ceiling  admits  sunlight.

     At  Toba Aquarium the African  manatees have mainly been fed Italian ryegrass and leaf lettuce,  in addition to various foods  such  as Sorgo,  orchard grass, seagrass,  carrots  and Chinese  cabbage.  Initially, daily  food  consumption of the two manatees had been 50-60 kg,  which  is  estimated to be  about  5%  of their  body  weight/day/animal;  now  it   has increased   to   80-90   kg   (8-9%   of   body weight).  Their  body  weights  were  386  kg (male)  and  379  kg  (female)  on  arrival  at Toba,  and had increased to 480 and 465  kg, respectively,  by  21 August 1996.   -   Shiro Asano and Shinji Sakamoto (Toba  Aquarium)

          [EDITOR'S NOTE: This very  large reported  weight gain of the animals  in  only two months was confirmed by Toba  Aquarium  personnel, who attribute it in part to  the fact  that  during the time  the  animals  were held  in Guinea-Bissau, their  digestive  tracts became  nearly  empty,  so  that  the  initially recorded weights were artificially low. As  of 23  March  1997,  Toba's  African  manatees were  doing well and had reached weights  of around 500 kg or more. The pair of  dugongs at  Toba  are also said to be  doing  well  and sometimes  mating; analysis  of  progesterone in  the  female's urine indicates  an  ovulation cycle of 50 days.]

 

     Wildlife Conservation Meets  Rational Utilization and Community Benefits:  The Controversial  Case of the African  Manatee in Guinea-Bissau. - On 12 June 1996,  a chartered jet left Bissau International  Airport carrying two very special passengers on a 28-hour journey. The two manatees  (Trichechus senegalensis)  on  board  were  en  route   for Toba  Aquarium in Japan after having left  in their  trail  a  number  of  heated   arguments between  local  conservationists,  government departments, NGOs, and foreign  professionals. Now that the dust has settled, it is possible  to come back to the facts and report  that the Toba Aquarium has gone to  considerable expense  and effort to acquire a pair of  African manatees from Guinea-Bissau.

     Guinea-Bissau  is  considered one  of  the poorest   countries  in  the  world,   with   an annual GDP of under US$200 per capita  and an external debt currently running at US$850 million.  It  is also one of  the  countries  that receive the most international aid. Saying that government    departments    lack     funding, equipment, expertise, and motivation is  only an understatement of the reality. Middle-level government  staff receive in a  very  irregular manner  a salary of around 500,000  Guinean pesos (US$22) per month.

     Although   some   authors   indicate   that Guinea-Bissau hosts the largest population  of manatees  in  West  Africa  (Kelleher  et   al. [eds.]. 1995. A Global Representative System of Marine Protected Areas, Volume II. World Bank/IUCN), little is known locally about the status  of  the  population.  The  most  recent work,  based  on sample  censuses,  gives  an estimate  of  around 10,000  animals  for  the country   (Schuhmann,   H.J.   1995.    "Der Manati,   Trichechus  senegalensis,   im   Rio Geba,  Guinea  Bissau." Natur  und  Museum 125(12): 402-409).

     Intentional killing of manatees is not rare. This  is  done by transgressors  of  traditional laws  and  beliefs for the purpose of  sales  of meat (considered as the finest available),  and by peasant farmers in revenge for the destruction of rice fields in which the animals  graze when the water levels rise. The main threat to the manatee comes from the disappearance of its natural and undisturbed habitat.

     Manatees   seem  to  occur  in  all   water channels   of  the  country  (except   the   Rio Corubal;  Anon. 1989. Résultats  de  l'inventaire  faunique au niveau national et  propositions  de modifications á la loi sur  la  chasse. MDRA/CECI/IUCN) and in the shallow  and turbid   waters  of  the  Bijagos   Archipelago (recently  classified as a Biosphere  Reserve). The   Bissau-Guinean  manatee  is  listed   on Appendix  II  of CITES. The  Direcça~o  Geral das  Florestas  e Caça (General  Direction  of Forestry  and  Hunting)  is  the   management authority   responsible   for   the   issuing   of CITES certificates. Locally, hunting and  live captures  are regulated by a rather  antiquated law   of  1980  that  indicates  that   protected animals   should  not  be  killed  or   captured alive.  The  manatee  is  listed  locally  as  an "Animal Protegido".

     (NOTE:  The following  information  was obtained  from  Mr.  Schuhmann,  who   was acting  as an intermediary between  the  Toba Aquarium   and  the  local  authorities.   This information was cross-checked and completed with information from the staff of the  Direction   of  Forestry  and  Hunting   who   were involved with the operation on the ground.)

     In  December 1993, the  Toba  Aquarium contacted a private entrepreneur in Bissau for the  acquisition  of  two  pairs  of   manatees. After  discussions  between  the  Ministry  of Agriculture and Toba, two expeditions had to be  organized  to get a clearer picture  of  the status of the population before a decision was to  be  taken  and  the  relevant  national  and CITES  permits  issued.  After  these  expeditions  were  completed (December  1994  and March  1995), formal application  was  made by  the  intermediary for the  capture  of  two pairs  of animals. Toba sent appropriate  staff to  meet  with  the Ministry  and  finalize  the agreement.  In  the  meantime,  the  Japanese CITES   authorities  provided  the   necessary authorizations for import.

     The  capture  was  to  take  place  in  Rio Geba,  where  the  largest  concentrations   of manatees  were encountered during  the  surveys. Toba sent one veterinarian, two  biologists,  and  three animal  keepers  to  Guinea-Bissau for the event. They were accompanied by  the  local  intermediary and  staff  of  the Ministry   of  Agriculture.  Soon  after   their arrival  on the river, the team was  offered  a pair  of  manatees  by  the  local   fishermen. Unfortunately these had been killed.

     After  several  days  of  fruitless   capture attempts by the Japanese team it was  decided to request the assistance of the local leader of the  fishermen. Within a few days, two  animals  (male and female), each measuring  2.5 m  long,  were captured  simultaneously  and delivered to the team alive and in good condition.  Minor skin wounds caused by  the  capture  nets  developed  into  localized  mycosic infections  and  were treated  (the  red  marks left by the antiseptic were interpreted later by some  observers as open bleeding, leading  to fears  for the health and welfare of  the  animals). Twenty million Guinean pesos (around US$850  at the time) were paid to  the  leader of   the  fishermen  for  the  services  of   the community. In the meantime, the Ministry of Fisheries,  alarmed by the  unrecorded  presence of a foreign party using fishing nets in a river,  sent staff to investigate. After  agreement over the non-fish nature of the  manatee and the exhibition of the appropriate  authorizations and certificates, staff of that  ministry was  reassured that no foul play  was  underway.

     The animals were kept at the capture  site for  two  weeks in a specially  arranged  pool (10  m  in diameter and 1 m in  depth).  They were  then  transported by truck  with  police escort to the zoo in Bissau, a 9-hour journey. In Bissau, they were kept in a similar pool  (a spare pool was kept filled at all times in  case leakage     would    create    an     emergency situation).  In  a matter of days,  the  animals became  familiar  with the  people  and  were accepting  play.  They were  fed  on  cultured vegetables and water plants, and later accepted  all types of vegetables. After a  few  days of seclusion to allow them to recuperate from the  stress caused by the change of  environment  and transport, the Ministry of  Agriculture  authorized visitors to view the  animals. It is reported that as many people came to see the  manatees every day as there  are  visitors to  the  zoo  in one month  in  normal  times. Entry  fees  are paid directly into  the  State's coffers.

     Overall,  the  acquisition  of  one  pair  of manatees seems to have cost the Toba Aquarium  around  US$1.8 million.  This  includes the  conversion of one of their  enclosures  at the aquarium to meet the needs of the African manatees,  the chartering of the  aircraft,  the Japanese  staff's time and transport,  the  capture  equipment,  insurance  costs,   technical assistance  in Guinea-Bissau, purchase of  ten bicycles,  six motorbikes, and six  computers to  be used by the Direction of  Forestry  and Hunting, etc.

     So  far, no problem has been reported  by Toba  concerning  the health of  the  animals. The Japanese could be interested in acquiring another  pair of African manatees in order  to increase  the chances of captive  breeding.   -  Eric M. Feron (Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor, IUCN, Guinea-Bissau)

 

          Manatee   Conservation   Plan   for Guinea-Bissau.   -   IUCN    Guinea-Bissau, together  with  the  Direcça~o  das  Florestas   e Caça (Forestry and Hunting Department), are preparing   a  first  study  to   elaborate   and implement  a  national  manatee  conservation action  plan.  This  study  should  take   place before  July  1997  with  the  assistance  of  a Portuguese marine mammal specialist.

          Given  the fact that  Guinea-Bissau  is considered  to host the largest  population  of manatees (Trichechus senegalensis) in Africa, the project is of major value for the conservation of biodiversity.

          We would like to call for  information from  specialists  in  this subject  in  order  to benefit from the wealth of expertise available through  the IUCN Sirenia Specialist  Group. Please contact: Eric M. Feron (Chief  Scientific and Technical Advisor, IUCN Bissau, e-mail gbro@hq.iucn.org, fax +245 201168)           

 

MEXICO

 

          Manatee  Sanctuary  in  Mexico.   - One of the most important areas for manatees in  Mexico  is Chetumal Bay and  the  Hondo River, situated in the southeastern part of  the Mexican   state  of  Quintana  Roo,   on   the border with Belize. On 25 October 1996,  the President  of Mexico declared Chetumal  Bay to be a Manatee Sanctuary. As the first  officially protected area for manatees in Mexico, this   sanctuary  shows  that  the  people   and government  of  Mexico are  concerned  with conservation  of this endangered  sirenian.  In Quintana  Roo,  the manatee is  a  symbol  of conservation of living resources.

          The  declaration  of  the  sanctuary  is consistent with specific recommendations  for proactive  conservation  of  the  West  Indian manatee,  as  stipulated in 1994-1995  by  the United  Nations  Environment   Programme's SPAW  (Specially Protected Areas and  Wildlife) Regional Programme. Because Chetumal  Bay waters are under the jurisdiction  of both  Mexico and Belize, the  government  of Mexico has encouraged the Belizean government  to implement protection in  those  parts of  the  Bay  that  belong  to  Belize.  If   this happens,   the  two  governments  will   have protected one of the most important  manatee habitats in the Caribbean.

          The Chetumal Bay Manatee Sanctuary contains 281,320 ha, including over  101,000 ha of mangroves, wetlands, and  hydrological basins  adjacent to the Bay.  The  characteristics  of  the  Bay that make it  attractive  to  a population  of  about  130  manatees   include shallow  and protected waters, a  temperature range of 25-30°C, and salinities of 0-18  ppt. The  main  aquatic  vegetation  includes   Batophora   sp.,   Chara  sp.,   Najas   marina, Ruppia   maritima,  Halodule  wrightii,   and Thalassia testudinum.

          Creation   of   the  Sanctuary   is   the product  of several years of  research,  public education,  and  negotiations  by  the  marine mammals  staff of El Colegio de  la  Frontera Sur   (ECOSUR),  together   with   important activities of citizens concerned with conservation   of  this  aquatic  mammal  in   Mexico. During  1997, ECOSUR will work  with  the Government of Quintana Roo and the  Ministry  of  Natural Resources in Mexico  City  to develop  a management plan for  the  Sanctuary. Special attention will be paid to  conservation   of  areas  most  frequently  used   by manatees,  protection of streams and  lagoons that  drain  into  the  Bay,  regulating  use  of pesticides  and  herbicides  along  the  Hondo River, and regulating use of fishing nets  that have  incidentally taken manatees in  the  past six  years. Efforts will be made to  strengthen bilateral  cooperation  between  Mexico   and Belize  to  conserve manatees;  the  foci  will include   additional   collaborative   research, education, and public awareness.

          Another   important   component    of manatee   conservation  in  Mexico  was   the creation  of  the  NGO  Amigos  del  Manati, A.C.,  in September 1996 in  Chetumal  City (P.O.   Box  334,  C.P.   77000).   Benjamín Morales is the President of the NGO (e-mail: bmorales@xaway.ciqro.conacyt.mx),   whose main goal is to assist development of manatee education  activities,  especially  in  Quintana Roo  and Belize. Any support or  educational materials in English or Spanish are welcome.  -    Benjamín   Morales   Vela   (ECOSUR, Apdo. Postal 424, C.P. 77000, Chetumal, Q. Roo, Mexico)

 

          Impounded  Manatees  in   Tabasco Threatened.   -  A  group  of   West   Indian manatees is impounded in a large pond located  in a park in the city of Jonuta in the  state of Tabasco, southern Mexico. Five years ago this  population  consisted of  12  individuals. Because  of  fluctuating water  availability  as well  as  pollution, the  population  has  been reduced to five or six individuals. Two  years ago a brook that leaves the pond was blocked to  try  to  alleviate  the  pollution   problem, which  was  mainly  caused  by  sewage  discharge,  but  at  the  same  time  this  created another  problem: during the dry  season  the water supply was scarce, leaving the  animals in a very shallow environment. This  problem has been taken care of with the installation of a  pump that supplies water from  the  nearby Usumacinta River.

          I  am concerned about this  population and have been trying to start a project with  a group of classmates. Unfortunately, there are political  issues involved as well as  economic limitations  and  this has made it  difficult  to get  started. Nonetheless, I managed to get  a permit  to exhume bones (vertebrae and  ribs) of an individual that died one year ago.

          I  would like to have  the  suggestions of  other  sirenian researchers  and  conservationists  about  how  to  proceed.   -    Diego Santiago  Alarcón  (c/Marte  #107,   Fracc. Galaxia, C.P. 86035, Villahermosa,  Tabasco 2000, Mexico)

 

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

 

          Dugong Postage Stamp. - On  January   25,  1996,  the  United  Arab   Emirates postal  service  issued a set  of  three  marine mammal postage stamps promoting environmental   protection.  The  50f   denomination depicts  a  group of dugongs; the  2d  and  3d stamps   portray  the  common  dolphin   and humpback  whale, respectively.  These  three stamps,  which  bear  Scott  catalog  numbers 506-508,   were  also  issued  as  a   souvenir sheet.

 

VIETNAM

 

          New  Record  of  Dugong  in   Con Dao  Waters, Southeast Vietnam.  -  There has been very little research and  information on  sea  animals  of Vietnam  in  general  and dugongs in particular. Up to now, the dugong has   been  recorded  several  times.  In   July 1960,  a dugong was caught in a  fishing  net about 20 km south of Nha Trang (Tran  Ngoc Loi,  1962). Van Bree and  Gallagher  (1977) published  information  on  seven   specimens from the Con Dao Islands, which are  housed in the Museum of Bordeaux, France, and one specimen  from Ha Coi (Tonkin Gulf,  North Vietnam)  housed  in  the  Muséum  National d'Histoire   Naturelle  (Paris).  Smith  et   al. (1995) reported dugong skulls from Van Gia, Khai Luong, Ba Ha 1, Cua Be, and Ninh Hai (around Nha Trang).

          During an expedition to the Con  Dao Islands by scientists from the Haiphong  Institute of Oceanology in March-April 1996,  we were informed that a dugong had been caught in a fishing net in Con Son Bay in July 1993. This  dugong was reportedly 1.2-1.4  m  long and weighed 40-45 kg. Because no  scientists or  fixatives  were  available  on  the   island, photographs  of the dugong were made  by  a tourist  and  the dugong was then given  to  a fisherman for food. We have only two photos of this dugong given us by Mr. Le Xuan  Ai, Director of Con Dao National Park.

          Fishermen   from  Hong   Kong   who were  culturing coral reef fishes in  Con  Son Bay  informed us that they often saw a  group of 7-10 dugongs there during the period June-October,  when  the seagrass beds  are  better developed.   Four  species  of   seagrass   are present  at  Con  Dao:  Thalassia  hemprichi, Halophila  ovalis,  Halodule  tridentata,  and Syringodium isoetifolium.

 

References

 

Smith, B.D.,  Jefferson, T.A., Dao Tan  Ho, Leatherwood,  S.,  Chu  Van  Thuoc, Andersen  M.,  &  Chiam,  E.  1995. Marine   mammals   of   Vietnam:    a preliminary  checklist.  Collection   of Marine   Research   Works   (Inst.   of Oceanography,  NCNST of  Vietnam, Nha Trang) 6: 147-176.

 

Tran Ngoc  Loi. 1962. Capture d'un  dugong au Vietnam. Mammalia 26: 451-452.

Van Bree, P.J.H., & Gallagher, M.D.  1977. Catalogue    de    la    collection    des mammifères  marins  du  Muséum  de Bordeaux. Ann. Soc. Sci. Nat.  Charente-Maritime 6: 289-307.

 

 -   Lang  Van  Ken  (Haiphong  Institute  of Oceanology)

ABSTRACTS

 

          The  following  abstracts  are  of papers and posters presented  at  the  VII  Reunión  de Trabajo  de  Especialistas en Mamíferos Aquáticos de América del Sur, Vina del  Mar,  Chile, 22-25 October 1996.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECENT LITERATURE

 

Anderson,  P.K. 1995. Scarring and photoidentification of dugongs (Dugong dugon)  in  Shark Bay, Western Australia. Aquat. Mamms. 21(3): 205-211.

 

Bajpai, S.,  and  D.P. Domning. 1997. A new dugongine sirenian from the Early  Miocene  of India. Jour. Vert. Paleo. 17(1).  [Bharatisiren kachchhensis, n.gen. n.comb.]

 

Boice, L.P.  1996.  Managing  endangered  species  on  military  lands.  Endangered   Species Update 13(7-8): 1-5?  [Manatees in Florida and Puerto Rico.]

 

Chance,  M.R.A.  1996.  Reason  for externalization of the  testis  of  mammals.  Jour.  Zool. 239(4): 691-695.

 

De Iongh,  H.H.  1996.  Plant-herbivore  interactions between seagrasses  and  dugongs  in  a tropical  small  island  ecosystem. Ph.D. thesis,  Catholic  University,  Nijmegen,  The Netherlands;  printed  for  the  author, Wageningen,  The  Netherlands:  xviii  +  205.  [Comprises  two  articles  previously  published and  five  others  submitted  to  various journals, plus additional material.]

 

Domning, D.P. 1997. "Sirenia." Chap. 23 in: R.F. Kay, R.H. Madden, R.L. Cifelli, and J.J. Flynn  (eds.),  Vertebrate  Paleontology in the Neotropics: the  Miocene  Fauna  of  La Venta, Colombia. Washington & London, Smithsonian Inst. Press: 383-391.

 

Griebel,  U., and A. Schmid. 1996. Color vision in the manatee (Trichechus manatus).  Vision Res. 36(17): 2747-2757.


 

Kozawa,  Y.,  K. Suzuki, and H. Mishima. 1996. Development of tooth  structure  in  aquatic mammals. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. (Monaco), Special Issue 14(4): 353-357.

 

Lavergne, A., E. Douzery, T. Stichler, F.M. Catzeflis, and M.S. Springer. 1996. Interordinal mammalian   relationships:  evidence  for  paenungulate  monophyly  is   provided   by complete mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequences. Molec. Phylogenetics & Evol. 6(2): 245-258.

 

Lecuyer,  C.,  P.  Grandjean, F. Paris, M. Robardet, and  D.  Robineau.  1996.  Deciphering "temperature"  and "salinity" from biogenic phosphates: the d18O of  coexisting  fishes and mammals of the Middle Miocene sea of western France. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 126(1-2): 61-74.

 

Nickel, B.   1995.   On  the  palynostratigraphic  classification  of  the  sirenian   finding   site Schauenburg-Hoof  near  Kassel. Philippia 7(2): 165-167.  [In German;  Engl.  summ. Discusses an Oligocene Halitherium site.]

 

Preen, A.R., H. Marsh, I.R. Lawler, R.I.T. Prince, and R. Shepherd. 1997. Distribution  and abundance  of dugongs, turtles, dolphins and other megafauna in Shark  Bay,  Ningaloo Reef and Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia. Wildlife Research 24: 185-208.

 

Ricqlès, A.  de,  and  V.  de Buffrénil. 1995. Sur la présence  de  pachyostéosclérose  chez  la rhytine  de  Steller  [Rhytina (Hydrodamalis) gigas], sirénien  récent  éteint.  Ann.  Sci. Nat., Zool. (Paris) (13)16: 47-53.

 

Stubbe, M.  1996. Die Stellersche Seekuh (Hydrodamalis gigas, Syn.: Rhytina stelleri). In:  W. Hintzsche & T. Nickol (eds.), Die Grosse Nordische Expedition: Georg Wilhelm Steller (1709-1746)  -  ein  Lutheraner  erforscht Sibirien  und  Alaska.  Eine  Ausstellung  der Franckeschen Stiftungen zu Halle [12 May 1996 - 31 Jan. 1997]. Gotha, Justus Perthes Verlag  ([xii]  +  347  pp.):  285-290. [Chapter on  Steller's  sea  cow  in  the  lavishly illustrated  catalog  of  an  exhibit dealing with Steller's life  and  career  and  Bering's second expedition.]

 

Trocine,  R.P.,  and  J.H. Trefry. 1996. Metal concentrations in  sediment,  water  and  clams from the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 32(10): 754-759.

 

U.S. Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  1996. Florida  Manatee  Recovery  Plan  Second  Revision. Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: 160 pp.

 

Winter, L. 1993. The manatee excavation. Museum of Antigua and Barbuda [Newsletter?]:  [3 pp.]  [Description  of the excavation of a manatee skeleton in  Antigua  in  July-August 1993, with 3 photos and an inventory of the vertebrae and ribs recovered.]

 

Yang G.  and  Zhou K. 1996. Incidental catch and its impact on marine  mammal  populations. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao 7(3): 326-331.  [In Chinese; Engl. summ.]

 

 

CHANGES OF ADDRESS

 

Oficina AZCARM,  Zoologico  Guadalajara,  Paseo del Zoológico #600,  A.P.  1-1494,  C.P. 44100,   Guadalajara,   Jalisco,   MEXICO   (e-mail:   74173.1500@compuserve.com. MEXICO)

 

E. H. Downs, 18 Birklands Park, London Road, St. Albans, Herts AL1 1TS, ENGLAND

 

Peter J. Fernandes, 801 Coventry Lane, Apt. 202, Norwood, Massachusetts 02062-2438, USA

 

Casey J. Gluckman, 541 Old Magnolia Road, Crawfordville, Florida 32327, USA

 

Ruby Montoya, TAES Shrimp Mariculture Project, 1300 Port St., Port Aransas, Texas 78373-4200, USA

 

D. J. O'Donnell, 275 East Shasta Ave. #90, Chico, Cal. 95973-0543, USA

 

Jonathan Salkind, 217 South St., Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167-3651, USA

 

Charles Tambiah, c/o 451 Rinehardt Road, Mooresville, N. Car. 28115, USA

 

U.S. Marine   Mammal   Commission,  4340  East-West  Highway,   Room   905,   Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA

 

Wetlands   International,  Marijkeweg  11,  P.O.  Box  7002,  6700  CA  Wageningen,   THE NETHERLANDS (tel. +31 317 474711; fax +31 317 474712)

 

 

>>> COPY DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE:  OCTOBER 1, 1997 <<<

 

The Sirenews fax number is 1-202-265-7055 (USA).

 

Printed on recycled paper with soy ink

 

* * * * *