NUMBER  43                                                                                         APRIL 2005

 

 

IN THIS ISSUE:  -   FLORIDA KEEPS RULE LANGUAGE THREATENING

                                 MANATEE RECOVERY (p. 4)

 

-   DUGONG RESEARCH IN INDONESIA (p. 14)

 

 

EDITORIAL:

  EARTH TO FLORIDA:  CLEAN UP YOUR LANGUAGE!

 

            After many months of postponing consideration of a petition to downlist Florida manatees from “Endangered” to “Threatened” status under Florida law, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) has just taken a step toward such action (see story in this issue). Although the Commission’s vote at its April meeting did not directly affect manatees, it preserved the objectionable regulatory language according to which “Threatened” in Florida is equivalent to what the rest of the planet calls “Endangered”. The implication is clear, and the stage is now set: application of this lingo to manatees will sooner or later result in downgrading the degree of state protection for which they are deemed eligible.

            Since we already editorialized at length on this topic in Sirenews Nos. 38 (October 2002) and 42 (October 2004), little needs to be added at this time. Even though federal protection for manatees remains in place (for now; but see news items below), and any move by the state to actually downlist manatees is still several months and several
procedural steps away, it is nonetheless disturbing that the FWCC continues to ignore the torrent of scientific criticism provoked by its idiosyncratic twisting of well-established, globally-accepted terminology.

            On its website, the FWCC defends its language on the grounds that “these names are embedded in numerous Florida statutes, FWC rules and local ordinances. … FWC staff concluded that changing this terminology would be difficult, expensive and could lead to unintended problems with those statutes that might, indeed, reduce protections. In the end, staff believes the focus should be on identifying and protecting imperiled species, not on what the categories of imperilment are called. … Under the current and proposed processes, when a species is reclassified it receives a species-specific management plan that prescribes the actions and protections needed to recover the species. As such, even if a species is de-listed, it will still receive the protections necessary to protect the species.”

            Begging your pardon, but in the present political climate, this seems just a bit … well, naïve. We have legions of lawyers and lawmakers who are paid to get the language in our laws right; haggling endlessly over words is their bread and butter. Species-specific management plans? These are products of lengthy negotiation among numerous stakeholders, and as such are not immune to political influence. Even when a sound management plan exists, it takes more than a paper plan to ensure protection: the plan has to be backed by political support and political will, or it will not be implemented – as countless unenforced environmental laws in developing and developed countries bear witness. Names and labels are critical in galvanizing (or undermining) political support, and when you see someone trying to rewrite the dictionary in the midst of a political debate, you know it’s not an accident.

            In the end, this is far from being just a harmless quibble over words. The Florida manatee’s first line of protection is the public’s recognition that this species is, in fact, precariously balanced between survival and extinction, and endangered by long-term trends that will be difficult or impossible to reverse. Downlisting of manatees by the state would significantly weaken this line of defense; it would undermine efforts to implement additional protection measures, even as threats from development, boating, and other human activities increase without limit; and it would hand manatee opponents a huge propaganda victory that would immediately be used to mislead the public about the manatee’s true status.

            Those opponents understand very well the significance of a designation like “Endangered”, and they want a public-relations label that evokes less urgency, no matter what the actual data show. Although they have signaled that they seek only to block future protection measures and not overturn existing ones, don’t bet they won’t change their minds once the re-labeling is done and the State of Florida has “officially certified” that manatees are no longer “Endangered”, but merely “Threatened”.

            The threat level has just gone up.  -  DPD

 

 

SIRENIA SPECIALIST GROUP MEMBERSHIP

Based on discussions at the last meeting of the SSG in December 2004, a new membership list has been developed:

Executive Members: John Reynolds (co-chair), Buddy Powell (co-chair), Helene Marsh, Toshio Kasuya, Tony Mignucci, Ester Quintana, Miriam Marmontel, Vera da Silva, Akoi Kouadio, P.K. Ofori-Danson, Daryl Domning, Dan Odell (12)

Regular Members: Benjamin Morales-Vela, Donna Kwan, Fernando Weber Rosas, Ivan Lawler, Janet Lanyon, Jorge Calvimontes, Judith Vallee, Lem Aragones, Lynn Lefebvre, Tom O'Shea, V.G. Cockcroft, Hans de Iongh, Chip Deutsch, Ron Mezich, Nicole Adimey, Jim Valade, Nicole Auil, Caryn Self-Sullivan, Bob Bonde, Rogelio Diaz-Fernandez (20)

Please review the list and send any additions or recommendations to: Cynthia R. Taylor, Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Trust, 15 Paradise Plaza #369, Sarasota, Florida 34239-6905 USA; tel.: 941-232-4587 (cell), e-mail: <taylor@wildlifetrust.org>; website: <www.wildlifetrust.org>

 

COURSE ON GIS/REMOTE SENSING

FOR COASTAL AND MARINE SCIENTISTS

 

     Over the course of the last decade, marine and coastal applications of GIS and remote sensing have gained wide acceptance in the scientific and GIS communities. In recognition of this growing trend, the GIS certificate program at San Francisco State University is offering a course dedicated to those interested in incorporating GIS/remote sensing technologies in the study of the marine and coastal zones. 

            Previous offerings of this class have been very successful for both student and instructor alike and we are proud to offer it to the community for the fourth time. 

            The course is entitled: GIS and Remote Sensing Applications for Coastal and Marine Scientists, Geog 9023, Schedule No. 95083, held 14-18 June at San Francisco State University.

            Days 1 & 2: Introduction to GIS. This course is an introduction to the concepts and uses of GIS as it relates to coastal and marine science. Lecture topics include history of GIS, GIS data structures and sources of data, GIS tools, vendors and software, applications, and resources. Exercises include spatial data display and query, map generation, and simple spatial analysis using ArcGIS software. Instructor:  Ellen Hines teaches GIS at San Francisco State University. Her research on marine mammals includes studies on dugongs in southern Thailand, gray whales in British Columbia, and harbor seals in San Francisco Bay. Her research interests include the integrated use of GIS and remote sensing in delineation of marine mammal habitat.

            Days 3 & 4: Remote Sensing Course. This course is an introduction to the physical principles of electromagnetic radiation through earth's atmosphere and remote sensing sensors relevant for coastal and marine studies.  The course is designed for beginning level users. Instructor: Toby Garfield is an Associate Professor of Geosciences and conducts his research at the SFSU Environmental Campus, the Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies. His research interests include oceanic circulation along continental margins and estuarine circulation. His fieldwork emphasizes combining traditional data collection techniques with remote sensing data collection.

            Day 5: Hands on! Bring your own field data, or we can supply you with material to work with.

            Cost for the 5 days of instruction is US$1095.00. This course is offered through the SFSU GIS Certificate Program (http://gis.sfsu.edu/cert) in the College of Extended Learning (http://www.cel.sfsu.edu/); 4.0 continuing education units (CEU) can be earned. To guarantee a space in the class, please register early. Class size is limited. A list of accommodations is available.

            For further information, please contact Ellen Hines (ehines@sfsu.edu; tel. 1-415-405-0921) or Barry Nickel (bnickel@sfsu.edu; tel. 1-415-338-3566).

 

 

LOCAL NEWS

 


BRAZIL

 

            Another Amazonian Manatee Captive Birth. – On 6 April 2005, another female manatee gave birth to the fifth Amazonian manatee conceived and born in captivity at the Aquatic Mammal Laboratory of INPA in Manaus.  This time it is a female calf. The baby is feeding without problems. Mother and baby are well. The calf’s name will be chosen in a contest with the children from local schools to increase the awareness of the need to conserve these animals.  -  Vera da Silva

 

FLORIDA

   (NOTE: For detailed coverage of manatee matters in Florida, read Manatee News Quarterly, published by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.)

 

            Florida Continues March Toward Downlisting Manatees. – On 14 April 2005, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) voted to adopt amendments to state rule criteria that govern the listing and delisting of Florida’s imperiled species. These amendments only slightly improved the rule criteria, and fell short of the substantive changes that manatee advocates and other critics considered necessary to protect endangered wildlife. This action opens the way to potential downlisting of Florida manatees from “Endangered” to “Threatened” status, based purely on semantics and without any actual improvement in the animals’ prognosis for survival.

                After conducting a final public hearing on the proposal, during the first day of their two-day meeting in Tallahassee, the Commissioners voted to adopt updated listing criteria developed by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) since 1999. In addition, the Commission will ask IUCN experts to train FWCC scientists in how to apply the criteria. The Commissioners expressed their confidence in the updated process, but in acknowledgement of many stakeholders’ concerns about how it might impact certain species, they pledged to review the listing process if unforeseen problems arise during its implementation.

            (The Commission is a five-member board appointed by the governor to oversee hunting, fishing and wildlife protection.)

                The Commissioners also voted to lift the present moratorium on considering classification of listed species; but their decision does not immediately affect the listing status of any of the 118 animal species classified as Endangered, Threatened, or Species of Special Concern in the state list – including manatees, for which a biological status review by the state has not yet been completed.

            According to FWCC endangered species coordinator Dan Sullivan, a key strength of the proposed process is how appropriate recovery actions will be identified and put in place. Whenever the agency considers listing, reclassifying or delisting a species, he said, FWCC staff will develop a management plan tailored to that individual species’ needs. The plan will outline species-specific protections, replacing less-effective blanket prohibitions of the past, which were tied to categories rather than species’ individual needs. The new updates also will strengthen the process by involving a biological review panel throughout the evaluation process and requiring an additional peer review of that panel’s assessment. Details on the proposed updates are available at <MyFWC.com/imperiledspecies>.

            But critics are not convinced.

            As reported at length in Sirenews No. 38 (October 2002), Florida adopted some years ago the basic listing criteria used by the IUCN for classifying imperiled species and the threats they face. What Florida has not adopted, however, are the names for the categories in the IUCN classification. Instead, Florida’s wildlife managers modified the IUCN language so that in order for a species to qualify as “Endangered” in Florida, it would have to meet the IUCN standards for “Critically Endangered”; whereas a species that was “Endangered” in the eyes of the IUCN and the rest of the world would be called merely “Threatened” within the boundaries of the State of Florida.

            Using one of the state’s listing/delisting criteria, a species would have to undergo or be at risk of undergoing an 80% decline in its population in order to be listed as “Endangered”. Listed species that have undergone precipitous declines historically, but are not continuing to decline at an 80% rate, could be downlisted despite the fact that their numbers are only a small fraction of their original populations. An 80% decline could easily cause a species to go extinct before conservation measures could be implemented. Population biologists point out that these criteria are particularly inappropriate for large, long-lived marine animals like manatees and sea turtles.

            Because of this FWCC action, Florida’s endangered species, such as manatees, panthers, and sea turtles, could potentially be reclassified as “Threatened” – or receive an even lower classification – all because of this misalignment of category names and definitions. Now that the rule amendments have been adopted, FWCC plans to move forward with the completion of its manatee biological status review precipitated in 2001 by a petition from an angler’s lobby group, the Coastal Conservation Association.

            Patrick Rose, a former state wildlife official and now Director of Government Relations for the Save the Manatee Club, commented that “State decision-makers are listening to special interests like never before. They have already downlisted the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker to a ‘Species of Special Concern’. It will only be a matter of time before the state receives more petitions from special interest groups to downlist other species whose habitat requirements get in the way of developers’ profit-making.  Sales prices for individual boat slips built over submerged lands held in public trust have soared to over US$1 million in some cases. With so much money to be made at the public’s expense, it’s no wonder that the [state regulatory] agencies are being pressured by the legislature to open the floodgates of development without adequate checks and balances to protect the environment and especially our imperiled species.” 

            Fortunately, manatees in Florida are still protected by federal legislation including the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act. As long as the perennial attempts to weaken these federal laws are kept at bay, manatee protection measures that are already in place should remain. But even at the federal level, the possibility of downlisting the manatee has just been put back on the table with the announcement (with less than a 2-month deadline for submission of information) of a review of the manatee’s status  by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (see related story below).

            Also less than encouraging are two personnel matters on the federal level. U.S. Interior Secretary Gale Norton has named as acting director of FWS one Matthew J. Hogan, a former chief lobbyist for the Safari Club International – an organization that encourages the hunting of big game, including endangered species, as well as promoting wildlife conservation.

            FWS, in turn, has expanded the interagency Manatee Recovery Team from its traditional makeup of some 15-20 biologists and wildlife managers, inflating it to a membership of 120 that for the first time includes representatives of the boating, dock-building, and development industries in addition to manatee experts. The Recovery Team is charged with making recommendations on manatee management and listing to Secretary Norton.

            Given all these developments, especially in the context of the June deadline for submissions to FWS’s manatee status review, there is growing concern among manatee defenders.

            “People are going to think that any species undergoing a downward category change is on the road to recovery – purely because the FWCC is obstinately refusing to align the IUCN categories and names for these categories with their own listing/delisting guidelines,” said biologist Patti Thompson, the Save the Manatee Club’s Director of Science and Conservation. “No matter what happens on the state level, manatees will still be listed as endangered by the federal government. Unfortunately, special interests will be pushing for species’ reclassifications as a way to rid themselves of what they believe to be excessive regulations,” said Thompson.

            Earlier, a state review of 24 listed species found that a majority of the species could be downlisted or even delisted when the state’s flawed criteria were applied. It is possible that the Florida panther, with an estimated 80 individuals living in the wild, could fall down a category from endangered to threatened status. The black bear would have a good chance of being delisted altogether, paving the way for the bear to once again be hunted. The federal Marine Mammal Commission has stated that the northern right whale – the most endangered marine mammal in America, with a population of fewer than 350 individuals – would likely fall down a category as well under the state’s too-stringent criteria. David Laist of the Marine Mammal Commission agreed that the FWCC action “establishes an unreasonably low standard of protection for endangered species” that is “inconsistent with federal law.”

            “Manatees and, in fact, all of the state’s wildlife will continue to face mounting pressures from Florida’s fast-paced growth,” said Rose. “To illegitimately downlist a species won’t do anything to protect our wildlife. We want the state to base the biological status of any species on scientific benchmarks, including stable or increasing survival rates, comprehensive habitat protection, and significant reduction of human-related mortality.”  -  DPD

 

            Fish and Wildlife Service Announces 5-year Status Review for the Florida Manatee. - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) announced on 14 April 2005 that it is conducting a five-year review of the Florida manatee, which is federally protected as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). The five-year review will assess the best available scientific and commercial information to determine how the manatee is faring since its original listing in 1967.

            According to Dave Hankla, the Service's field supervisor for its North Florida Ecological Services Office in Jacksonville, the Service is particularly interested in new information which has become available since the last revision to the Florida Manatee Recovery Plan in 2001.

            "There has been a tremendous amount of effort put into manatee conservation and research over the last several years," Hankla said, "and this is an opportunity for our biologists and conservation managers to conduct a comprehensive review of the latest and best scientific and commercial data available."

            In the case of the Florida manatee, the Service is looking for new information related to five specific areas:

1)  species biology, such as popu-lation trends, distribution, demographics and genetics;

2)  habitat conditions such as amount, distribution and suitability;

3)  conservation measures which have been implemented that benefit the species;

4)  threat status and trends; and

5) other new information, data or corrections, such as improved analytical methods, nomenclatural changes, or identification of errors in the information contained in the original listing.

            To be of greatest use to Service biologists conducting the review, any new information submitted should be supported by documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to gather the data, and/or copies of any pertinent publications, reports or letters from knowledgeable sources.

            Five-year reviews allow the Service staff to determine if sufficient information is available to warrant a recommendation to reclassify a species or even take it off the ESA list altogether.  According to Hankla, any recommendation to change the manatee's status would only be considered if substantiated by the data and would not be made without due consideration.

            "If, after reviewing all the information, we determine nothing has changed, the manatee's status will remain Federally-listed as endangered," Hankla said. "However, if the data substantiates that a reclassification or de-listing is warranted, we could recommend either. Any such decision to recommend reclassification or de-listing would require a separate rulemaking process which would include ample opportunity for public review and comment."

            The Federal Register notice announcing this solicitation of new information and data is available online at <northflorida.fws.gov> or may be requested by e-mail to <manatee@fws.gov>, by fax at 904-232-2404, by mail at U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attn: Manatee Five-year Review, 6620 Southpoint Drive, Suite 310, Jacksonville, FL 32216-0958, or by telephone at 904-232-2580.

            New information and comments may be mailed, hand-delivered, faxed, or submitted electronically. Please mail or deliver comments to the address or fax number listed above. Comments submitted electronically should be embedded in the body of the e-mail message itself or attached (please see Notice for details), and should not use special characters or encryption. Please include "Attn: Manatee 5-year Review" in your subject line, and your full name, return address, and, if appropriate, your company, government agency, or organization you represent, in your e-mail message.  Comments submitted to <manatee@fws.gov> will receive an automated response confirming receipt of your message.

            In order for biologists and conservation managers to have sufficient time to consider any new information, the information and any supporting data or documents must be received by the Service no later than 13 June 2005.  -  (FWS press release)

 

            New Manatee Biological Population Assessment Released. – [ED. NOTE: The following are excerpts from the summary of the latest annual report from the Manatee Population Status Working Group (MPSWG), an advisory body to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) composed of scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey, Marine Mammal Commission, USFWS, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Montana State University, Coastal Conservation Association, Save the Manatee Club, and Wildlife Trust. The MPSWG is the most authoritative source there is on the status of the Florida manatee.]

            … The Northwest and Upper St. Johns River subpopulations exhibit very similar dynamics:  mortality is low, reproduction is high, and subpopulation growth rate is positive.  Most known mortality of non-adults is from natural causes, while adult mortality is due primarily to human-related causes, mostly watercraft.  Because these two populations are small and because they appear to depend on a small number of winter aggregation sites, relatively small fluctuations in habitat or the number of mortality and birth events could substantially influence population growth rate and trend.  At the present time, the observed growth rates suggest that these subpopulations are [MSOffice1] below the environmental carrying capacity for manatees and additional growth can reasonably be expected. …

            The status and dynamics of the Atlantic subpopulation are less clear than the Northwest or Upper St. Johns River subpopulations.  Adult survival and reproductive rates are moderate, but evidence regarding recent growth rate of the subpopulation is inconclusive: it is possible that the population is growing slowly, but also possible that apparent growth in the early 1990s has tapered off and the subpopulation may be stable or declining.  The manatee population growth rate estimates from two different analyses vary, and resolution of the difference will require additional study.  For adults, watercraft-related mortality as a proportion of all sources of mortality is more than in the Northwest and somewhat less than the Upper St. Johns River, but because the total mortality rate is higher for the Atlantic Coast (as indicated by lower survival rates), watercraft mortality has a greater impact on population dynamics than in the Northwest or Upper St. Johns River subpopulations.  Mortality of non-adult animals appears to be primarily from natural causes. …

            The Southwest subpopulation appears to be the most vulnerable to decline.  Estimates of adult survival are low and the growth rate estimates indicate the subpopulation appears to be declining.  For non-adults, most mortality is natural. For adults, watercraft mortality is the highest ranked cause of death.  The Southwest subpopulation is unique in that it faces major, periodic mortality events due to red tide.  Red tide is responsible for nearly one-fourth of known-cause mortality across ages.  Based on the available data, it appears that if this subpopulation is to stabilize or indeed increase in size, it cannot sustain any further increases in mortality.  Two factors make it difficult to assess some aspects of the status of the Southwest subpopulation.  First, the time series of data is shortest for this subpopulation, thus the survival and reproductive estimates are less precise than for the other subpopulations.  Second, the subpopulation is found in diverse habitats from Tampa Bay to Everglades National Park, and demographic data are lacking for individuals in the southernmost parts of the region. 

            State-wide patterns concerning mortality risk can be discerned by comparing the relative causes of death in the four subpopulations.  For adults in each subpopulation the most prominent source of mortality is watercraft collision.  The second ranked cause of death varies by subpopulation.  In the Northwest it is cold stress; in the Upper St. Johns River it is crushing by gates or locks; in the Atlantic it is unspecified natural causes; and in the Southwest it is red tide.  For non-adults in all subpopulations, perinatal death is the leading cause of mortality with watercraft collisions ranked second.  Cold stress ranked third for non-adults in all subpopulations except the Southwest, where red tide is the third leading cause of mortality. …

            The Southwest and Atlantic Coast subpopulations show larger uncertainty in demographic rates than the Northwest and Upper St. Johns River.  Such differences are expected.  The natural world is intrinsically variable, and each region is characterized by its own set of confounding factors regarding data collection, manatee behavior and analysis of population dynamics.  The MPSWG makes several recommendations in this report to reduce uncertainty and improve estimates.  Analyses that incorporate data from multiple sources such as photo-identification, aerial surveys, carcass recovery, and genetic markers will be important.  These new approaches, however, will require development of new data collection protocols and analysis, which may take years of directed effort.  New applications should be pursued, while at the same time maintaining and improving monitoring for annual assessments under current methods. …

            The MPSWG evaluated available manatee data and analyses to determine whether they were adequate to assess recovery under the existing demographic recovery criteria as provided in the Florida manatee recovery plan.  Available data and analyses are largely adequate for assessing the survival rate criterion; they are inadequate, however, for assessing the reproductive criterion as written and vary in adequacy for assessing the growth rate criterion for the different subpopulations. 

 

Are Thirsty Cities Thwarting Manatee Recovery Efforts? - The Florida manatee's prospects for survival may depend less on boaters -- who for decades have been scorned for mauling the animals with propellers and boat hulls -- and more on the unquenchable thirst of booming cities like Orlando, Tampa and Fort Myers, the federal official overseeing recovery efforts said yesterday.

That surprising assessment by Dave Hankla, field supervisor of the Fish and Wildlife Service's North Florida Ecological Services Office, sets the stage for what promises to be a robust debate over the service's five-year status review for one of Florida's most enduring wildlife symbols.

Other findings expected from the review are that manatees would not survive without hot water discharges from power plants, and that recurring red tides along the Gulf Coast threaten to set recovery back decades, FWS officials said. Yet of all the marine mammal's threats, the one with the least chance of reversal is Florida's exploding population, which is expected to reach 20.7 million by 2025, and the resulting drawdown of underground water resources.

Freshwater springs, extending from the Floridan aquifer in the east-central part of the state, are essential to manatees during the winter, where they congregate by the hundreds in warmer, shallow inlets to stave off hypothermia. Without the warmer water, the animals would experience mass die-offs, federal officials say.

"The more water you take out, the less chance these natural springs have of replenishing themselves. And if the warm water isn't there, there's a good chance these animals will freeze to death," Hankla said in a telephone interview.

Such is the complex balance between human and wildlife needs in Florida, one of the most biologically diverse places in North America, and home to more federally protected species than all but three other states -- California, Hawaii and Alabama.

In the past month alone, two federal courts have ruled FWS failed to adequately protect the endangered Florida panther and eight other species (Greenwire, April 7). Those rulings followed FWS's finding late last month that the American crocodile had recovered sufficiently to revise its protective status from "endangered" to "threatened" (Greenwire, March 28).…

Some observers, like Pat Rose of the nonprofit Save the Manatee Club, believe the manatee will be the next high-profile Florida species proposed for relisting, even if the science does not justify it. "There is tremendous political pressure to have the Service come up with new [recovery] criteria so that the manatee can be downgraded" to threatened, Rose said.

Hankla denied such claims, noting that FWS is meeting an obligation it made in 2001 when it last revised the manatee's recovery plan. "There's really nothing behind this," he said. "We're doing it to reel in all the statistics and see where things stand."

Depending upon who is doing the counting, the manatee's status varies wildly -- from not meeting FWS recovery goals to far surpassing Florida's recent historic baseline for manatees.

Ted Forsgren, director of the Coastal Conservation Association of Florida, which represents 10,000 saltwater anglers, said his members see more manatees in Florida's inlets and bays than ever. Yet he complained "there is no measurable biological goal for the manatee herd," and therefore no end to the regulations that many anglers believe are excessive and unwarranted.

Slow-speed boating zones have been adopted across a quarter million acres of peninsular Florida, Forsgren said, affecting virtually every recreational, commercial and industrial waterway in the region. He added that the Coastal Conservation Association avoided the manatee issue for years until lawsuits filed in 2000 called on regulators to impose new regulations on 115 waterways where manatees were believed to live or migrate, including "some of the premier saltwater fishing areas of the state."

As a member of a federal advisory committee for manatee recovery, Forsgren is pressing FWS to revise its approach to determining the species' status. "There are challenges, there's no doubt about it," he said of the upcoming status review process. "But we've argued that without some way to remove emotion from the discussion, and finding a way to better quantify manatee success or failure, all you're going to do is argue about this forever."

But boating regulations are just one component of the manatee recovery program, and in the end possibly one of the easiest to resolve. The more difficult problem is ensuring that manatees do not perish from hypothermia in the winter months, when water temperatures in peninsular Florida can drop into 50-59 degrees Fahrenheit.

For years, manatees have relied on both natural and manmade sources of warm water to avoid winter stresses. These include warm springs that emerge from the Floridan aquifer as well as hot water discharges from power plants that are scattered throughout the manatee's range.

Virtually all of the state's electric utilities -- including Florida Power & Light (FPL), Progress Energy, and Tampa Electric Company (TECO) -- now manage water discharges from their generators' turbine-cooling systems to aid manatees. At some power plants, like FPL's Cape Canaveral Plant on the Indian River east of Orlando, manatees have been known to congregate by the hundreds in waters warmed by FPL's warm water discharges. The same is true for the company's Riviera Plant in Palm Beach County and its Fort Myers plant on the Gulf Coast.

"From a utility's perspective it's a very complicated issue," said Winifred Perkins, FPL's manager of environmental relations. "As the state's largest electricity provider, we can't dismiss this. We do what we have to do."

Currently that means adhering to a wastewater discharge permit clause calling for five FPL plants to provide a continuous source of warm water to manatees through the winter months. Similar measures are in place at the state's other large utilities, like Progress Energy and TECO.

Dave Bruzek, a spokesman for Progress Energy, which operates three power plants on the Gulf Coast, said the wastewater permits "were negotiated with the state to maximize the use of those plants while minimizing effects to manatees…. The company is more than willing to do that as long as those constraints do not threaten the reliability of our electric service."

With near universal agreement, even among environmentalists, that power plants provide an essential benefit to manatees and that warm water will continue to flow from discharge pipes to wintering areas, concern about water resources has shifted to broader questions of water consumption in Florida.

Hankla said securing clean, warm water -- particularly from natural springs -- is the top issue facing manatee recovery this century. "The animals don't go out and randomly look for warm water. The adults teach their offspring where these water sources are," he said.

Another pressing issue is red tides, a form of toxic algae that can poison manatees who come into contact with it. Some believe red tides, which tend to form in warm waters, are related to nutrient loading and other forms of human pollution.

At current population growth rates, officials expect the Floridan aquifer to be drawn down more regularly, which combined with other events like droughts, could pre-empt the natural feeding of warm springs that manatees need to survive.

Teresa Monson, a spokeswoman for the St. Johns River Water Management District, which includes booming Orlando, acknowledged the district's "dramatic increase in demand on water resources over the last few decades." She described the St. Johns region as having "a very productive aquifer," but added, "At the same time, we have quite a lot of demand on it, so it's one of those ongoing battles." She said the water management district works closely with the state to ensure that withdrawals do not exceed safe levels for wildlife and the environment.

Rose, of the Save the Manatee Club, noted that a number of warm springs have been lost over the last 50 years due to population growth and fresh water demand. And those that remain face imminent risk from overuse, landscape alterations, and agricultural and wastewater pollution.

"When you go out and add thousands and thousands of homes in these recharge areas, these people are not going to go away," Rose said. "They may find other sources of drinking water. But if that doesn't happen, it's the natural springs and ultimately the manatees that are going to suffer."  -  Daniel Cusick (Greenwire Southeast reporter)

 

            Owner to Sell Landmark Crystal Springs, Florida, Manatee-Themed Store. -- By draping a long, uncut piece of plush fabric from the tail to the mouth on the bottom of the stuffed animal, Marie Bienkowski found that it gave her plush manatees' mouths an unrivaled, distinct look.

            To be honest, no one else made stuffed manatees back then. But the former fifth-grade science teacher stitched her first while on maternity leave, and the next thing she knew everyone wanted one. Even Ty Warner, the creator of the famed Beanie Babies, she claims, used her patented method to stitch his own version of stuffed manatees.

            From Bienkowski's garage, the Manatee Toy Co. has grown into a downtown Crystal River landmark that continues to draw customers worldwide. For Bienkowski, it's more than she could have dreamed of, and it's something she's had to let go of this year after she, as founder, sold the store to another manatee lover who will continue to cater to those seeking anything that resembles the gentle sea giants.

            Inside the small homey store with wood floors and Jimmy Buffett songs playing on a constant loop, manatees adorn baby clothes, wine corks, mugs, drain stoppers, champagne flutes, shot glasses, wind chimes, figurines, backpacks, shopping bags, baby bags, cutting boards, Christmas cards, postcards, street signs, T-shirts, sweat shirts, license plates and salt shakers.

            But before there was all this, there were two stuffed manatee dolls.

            Bienkowski, who has a background in design, stitched them and gave them to her daughter Nicole in 1981. The 3-year-old dragged them everywhere, naming the larger gray toy Mandy and the smaller, plush one Sweet Tea.

            "People saw them," Bienkowski said. "Someone saw them at Port Paradise Dive Shop, and they asked if they could have three." Soon, every dive shop in the city -- which claims to be "Home of the Manatee" -- wanted to sell some.

            By the next year, Bienkowski had sold a few hundred. Over the next decade, her small company sold the stuffed manatees wholesale out of her Crystal River garage, where Bienkowski drew up the designs, a hired sewer stitched them and the animals were packed and shipped.

            "My kids were babies, and that's how they learned how to count," Bienkowski said. "Twelve manatees went into a box."

            In 1991, the Manatee Toy Co. moved to its current location, where offerings of just five sizes of toy manatees grew to include gator Christmas stockings, manatee puppets and stuffed shrimp until the store became the menagerie it is today.

            Guests from far away are not uncommon at the store, and a guest book bears testament to the world travelers who have stopped in. Recent pages show customers from Wyoming, Louisiana, Oregon, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Germany. Once, a German man told Bienkowski he'd be gracious enough to sign her book, thinking he'd be the only European to grace her pages.

            Just above his signature were signatures of people from Finland, Japan and Colombia.

            "Every day is unique in here," Bienkowski said, with a tinge of regret. She recalled the old movie stars, cancer survivors and famous authors she has met and the conversations she has had that make her wish she had kept a daily journal.

            But it's too late. Bienkowski sold the store on Nov. 15 to Helen Anderson, a former laboratory supervisor, who wanted to run her own business. Bienkowski said she wants to spend more time with her grown children, design more stuffed animals and firm up her manatee patent with a lawyer and begin asking other companies to stop using it. She'd rather her manatee design be used on toys that have a connection to the city of Crystal River, Bienkowski said in a schoolteacher's soft, firm tone. She also hopes to go back into teaching.

            But during the first three weeks of December, Bienkowski helped Anderson make the transition as the new store owner. She taught Anderson that pink flamingo hats sell, how the price-tag gun works, that yellow items are popular (though Anderson doesn't like the color) and how to get in touch with vendors.

            "You just don't give your baby to anybody," Bienkowski said.

            Anderson, a former customer who bought the store as soon as she found out it was for sale, said she loves manatees because of their "sheer size -- the primitiveness of them."

            "And their cute 'lil blue eyes," Bienkowski added like a proud mother.  -  Justin George (St. Petersburg Times, 7 January 2005)

 

INDONESIA

 

                Recent Dugong Research in Balikpapan Bay, Indonesia. - I would like to report on a recent study implemented by Paulien de Bruyn, Budiono, Danielle Kreb and the undersigned (2003) in Balikpapan Bay, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The study was a collaboration between the NGO RASI, the Mulawarman University (Indonesia), and the Institute of Environmental Sciences of Leiden University, The Netherlands.

            The main research effort has been done in Balikpapan Bay, East Kalimantan, during 2002, while continued observations were made during 2003 and 2004. It is the intention to continue this research also during the coming years. 

            Our research covered three aspects of the ecology of Balikpapan Bay: a) water quality, b) the presence of seagrass beds, c) observations of dugongs.

            Dugong observations were made from an engine-powered boat. On this boat, four persons would observe, each at a different angle from the boat for one hour, while the engine was switched off. Two persons would search with binoculars, two would search without binoculars. Every 15 minutes the binoculars would switch between the persons. In this way, the entire area surrounding the boat was covered with and without binoculars without wearing out the persons too much for them to stay concentrated.

            Dugongs were spotted 15 times in Balikpapan Bay. Dugongs were mostly seen swimming alone, but a group of three dugongs was also seen, and on one occasion a mother with her neonate was seen. Though the research area in Balikpapan Bay contained three seagrass fields, all dugongs were seen near one of these fields next to Kariangau, a small fishermen’s village within the vicinity of the State Oil Refinery.

            We found seagrass in different areas, but only in shallow water. Most seagrass beds were small and coverage was low; only three seagrass beds were large (2500, 1500 and 2000 m²). In deeper parts of the bay and parts where a thick layer of mud was on the bottom, no seagrass would grow. In addition, turbidity in the Bay was found to be medium to high, and historical data showed that the Bay had been severely affected by oil pollution in the past.

            Balikpapan Bay, East Kalimantan, is situated next to the city of Balikpapan. Some activities around this city are oil refining, timber harvesting, and shrimp farming. These last two activities cause more mud to be flushed into the bay, either by taking away the trees on the hills around the bay, or (for the shrimp farms) by reducing the amount of mangrove forest around the bay, which decreases the buffer zone for the mud. The foundation Proyek Pesisir (a NGO with financial support from USAID) shows that per year 68,669 tons of sediment are washed into the bay (Proyek-Pesisir 2002).

            Our observations show that the mud in the bay forms a threat for the seagrass in two ways, both by forming a thick muddy layer on parts of the bay bottom on which nothing grows, and by making the bay more turbid, so the sunlight does not reach the bottom of the bay anymore. In addition, historical data show impact of oil pollution on both the mangrove ecosystem and seagrass beds.

            Local fishermen also confirm that the amount of seagrass and the number of dugongs have declined in the last ten years. They also say they do not hunt the dugong.  -  Hans de Iongh

 

SIERRA LEONE

           

            The West African Manatee in Sierra Leone. - In January-February 2005 a waterbird census in all coastal wetlands of Sierra Leone was carried out. All larger estuaries were visited, including the Scarcies estuary, the Sierra Leone River estuary, Yawri Bay, and the Sherbro Island estuary. During this waterbird survey most mudflats, sandbanks and shallows were visited by boat. All areas have a strong tidal influence and are characterized by brackish habitats with muddy or sandy soils. The shallows are bordered by mangrove forests and especially in the Scarcies area with rice fields.

            At one location a manatee was observed. The animal lifted its head twice above the water and went down under when the boat approached too close. It was observed in troubled, less than 1.5 m deep salt water close to the shore of Yelibuya Island at the Great Scarcies River mouth (08° 57.037’ N, 13° 15.429’ W). 

            Apart from this observation, 11 fishing villages along the coast were visited, and interviews with local fishermen were organized in order to get information about wildlife and related hunting pressure. These interviews showed manatees still to occur along the entire coast in all estuaries, especially in the Scarcies area and the Sherbro Island region. The animals seem to move quite far inland, and it was stated by locals that manatees are more common in the rainy season (June-August). However, more accurate information about spatial and temporal movements is urgently needed. Unfortunately, manatees are hunted intensively in all wetlands. They are captured for consumption with special traps constructed in creeks. In one village the local hunters mentioned two captures in the last two weeks. We got the strong impression the species is severely threatened in Sierra Leone. Therefore, the high hunting pressure needs immediate attention.  -  Jan van der Winden and Alhaji Siaka (Working Group, International Waterbird and Wetland Research (WIWO), The Netherlands, and The Conservation Society of Sierra Leone (CSSL); e-mail: <jvdwinden@ hetnet.nl>)

 


 

 

 

 

ABSTRACTS

 

            The following abstract is of a paper presented at the 64th annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Denver, Colorado, 6 November 2004:

 

Eocene and Oligocene Evolution and Structure of the Aquatic Herbivore Adaptive Zone in the West Atlantic and Caribbean

M. Clementz1, D. P. Domning2, L. G. Barnes3, and B. L. Beatty4

(1. Smithsonian Inst. Marine Station, Fort Pierce, FL; 2. Howard Univ., Washington, DC; 3. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, CA; 4. Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS)

                Modern marine ecosystems support fewer herbivorous mammals than their terrestrial counterparts, and include only four nonsympatric species of Sirenia (e.g., sea cows, dugongs, and manatees).  Yet, the diversity of aquatic herbivores through most of the Cenozoic was typically higher, encompassing periods when multiple species co-inhabited the same regions, including species other than sirenians (i.e., desmostylians, xenarthrans).  With so many large mammal species foraging within a single locality, available resources of aquatic vegetation were likely to have been finely partitioned among herbivores, creating several distinct feeding niches.  We have begun to define these feeding niches using features of cranial morphology, enamel carbon isotope values, and dental microwear as evidence of dietary preferences.  Together, these independent lines of dietary evidence allow us to explore long-term patterns in the appearance and diverisification of these niches, providing insight into the development and structure of ancient aquatic communities. Three key regions we plan to study include the West Atlantic-Caribbean, Tethys-Mediterranean, and Eastern Pacific, all of which were sites of diverse aquatic herbivore faunas throughout most of the Cenozoic.  Here we present initial data collected from Eocene and Oligocene fossil localities in the West Atlantic-Caribbean region.  Fossils of aquatic herbivores collected from these deposits include multiple species from three separate families of Sirenia, including the earliest and most primitive family, the Prorastomidae.  Morphological evidence suggests that the locomotor capabilities, habitat preferences, and dietary preferences of these species were quite distinct and, when combined with carbon isotope evidence collected from tooth enamel, may reflect differences in the amount and type of seagrass included in each species diet. 

 

                The following abstracts are of papers and posters presented at the Florida Marine Mammal Health Conference, University of Florida, Gainesville, 7-10 April 2005. The conference website has links to PDFs of most of the presentations:

<http://www.vetmed.ufl.edu/marinemammal/flmmhc/Conf2005/ConfHome.htm>

 

Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Subcutaneous Blubber Samples from the Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris).

Bigelow, M.M., Keith, E.O (Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University)

     Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been recognized as human carcinogens since 1775.  Since that time, PAHs have been shown to have many other deleterious effects, and 16 PAHs have been listed as priority pollutants by the Environmental Protection Agency in the Clean Water Act.  PAHs have a strong potential to pollute the waters around Florida electricity generating plants due to contaminated effluents.  PAHs are also known to occur in many Florida ports because of large ship bilge pumping. Because Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) frequent both power plants and ports, especially during the cold weather months, there is a high potential for PAH accumulation.  In addition, the characteristic high turbidity of Florida waters causes PAHs to become more bioavailable, and thus manatees could ingest PAHs when they feed on vegetation with surface PAH accumulations. 

     Recently manatees have shown symptoms characteristic of PAH accumulation, i.e. impaired immune responses, prolonged umbilical healing, and eye pathology.  To date many studies have been published on the effects of PAH accumulation in marine mammals, but none have been published on manatees.  The purpose of this study was to conduct an introductory investigation on the levels of PAHs in the Florida manatee.

     Twenty-eight subcutaneous manatee blubber samples were obtained from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Marine Mammal Pathobiology Laboratory archive.  PAHs were extracted using an ASE 100 Accelerated Solvent Extraction System (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA), and the 16 primary pollutant PAHs were quantified using High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Boston, MA) with a Vydac 201TP5415 reverse-phase (C18, 5 µm, 4.6 mm ID x 150 mm) HPLC column (Grace Vydac, Hesperia, CA), and calibrated by  comparison to a standard priority pollutant PAH mixture.

     PAHs were found in the concentrations range of 0.001-23.565 ug/g.  All animals examined were found to have at least one priority pollutant PAH, and trace amounts of all 16 priority pollutant PAHs were found in one animal.  These preliminary results indicate that Florida manatees are accumulating PAHs and that this accumulation may result in deleterious effects on their health, reproduction, and survivability.

 

Belize Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) Epibionts – SEM Viewing Techniques

 *,+Bonde, R. K., +Lewis, P., +Samuelson, D., ±Self-Sullivan, C., #Auil, N., and #Powell, J. A.

(*U.S. Geological Survey – Sirenia Project; +University of Florida, College of Veterinary Medicine; ±Texas A&M University; #Wildlife Trust)

This is the first reported evidence of epibiont fauna on the skin of West Indian manatees (Trichechus manatus) outside of Florida and Cuba.  Published records only exist for the identity of two copepods (Harpacticus pulex) observed on the skin of a manatees from southern Florida (Humes 1964) and (Harpactichecus manatorum) as reported for manatees in Cuba (Ortiz et al. 1992).  In both these cases the copepods were observed on the skin with no tissue reaction.  Other than occasional barnacles on the epidermis of manatees in marine environments throughout their range, there is little documentation of true ecto-parasitic associations with manatees.  This study identifies and details one new ecto-parasitic association involving the amphipod crustacean (Sinelobus stanfordi) that readily attaches itself firmly into the epidermis.  Additionally, this case documents several additional epibionts (at least one other crustacean, a bryozoan, a diatom, and a nematode) obtained from the dorsal skin surface scrapings of two manatees examined off the Drowned Cayes in coastal Belize during May of 2004. 

Specimens were preserved and examined using both light dissection and scanning electron microscopy.  All specimens were collected in the course of radio-tagging studies that have been conducted in Belize since 1997.  To date, 77 manatees have been captured repeatedly and valuable health assessment data have been collected and evaluated for each animal.  Ongoing studies are planned for detailed monitoring of manatees in this region of Central America.

 

Manatee Protection Rulemaking by the FWC: How the FWC Implements its Statutory Responsibilities

Scott Calleson  (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission )

                The state of Florida has regulated boat speed and operation to protect manatees since the late 1970s.  This management responsibility has been handled by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) since 1999.  The primary purpose of the regulations, as stated in the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act, is to protect manatees from harmful collisions with motorboats and from harassment.  The regulations appear in Chapter 68C-22 of the Florida Administrative Code.

                The rule making process can be divided into three b